From 448e47e756c0c67fc658f93575092973aa455fb1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Johannes Ranke Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2023 08:53:15 +0200 Subject: Point to the dmta pathway vignette in the dmta test --- tests/testthat/test_dmta.R | 7 +++++-- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/tests/testthat/test_dmta.R b/tests/testthat/test_dmta.R index cd6de341..3941cae1 100644 --- a/tests/testthat/test_dmta.R +++ b/tests/testthat/test_dmta.R @@ -85,9 +85,12 @@ test_that("Different backends get consistent results for SFO-SFO3+, dimethenamid "Iteration 5, LME step.*not converge") ints_nlme_mets <- intervals(nlme_sfo_sfo3p_tc, which = "fixed") - skip("Fitting this ODE model with saemix takes about 15 minutes on my system") + skip("Fitting this ODE model with saemix takes about 5 minutes on my new system") + # August 2023: Please refer to the mkin vignette for the currently + # recommended way to fit the DMTA pathway data with saemix + # As DFOP is overparameterised and leads to instabilities and errors, we - # need to use SFO. + # need to use SFO with nlme # saem_saemix_sfo_sfo3p_tc <- saem(dmta_sfo_sfo3p_tc) # The fit above, using SFO for the parent leads to low values of DMTA_0 # (confidence interval from 84.4 to 92.8) which is not consistent with what -- cgit v1.2.1