diff options
| author | ranke <ranke@5fad18fb-23f0-0310-ab10-e59a3bee62b4> | 2006-05-12 21:59:33 +0000 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | ranke <ranke@5fad18fb-23f0-0310-ab10-e59a3bee62b4> | 2006-05-12 21:59:33 +0000 |
| commit | 69504b635d388507bce650c44b3bfe17cad3383e (patch) | |
| tree | 120114ff6dc2d1aeb4716efef90d71257ac47501 /inst/doc/chemCal.tex | |
| parent | 6d118690c0cae02fc5cd4b28c1a67eecde4d9f60 (diff) | |
- Fixed the inverse prediction
- Now I have a working approach for the calculation of LOD and LOQ,
but it seems to be different from what everybody else is doing
(e.g. Massart chaper 13). I like it, however. Maybe it even
yields a paper.
git-svn-id: http://kriemhild.uft.uni-bremen.de/svn/chemCal@8 5fad18fb-23f0-0310-ab10-e59a3bee62b4
Diffstat (limited to 'inst/doc/chemCal.tex')
| -rw-r--r-- | inst/doc/chemCal.tex | 6 |
1 files changed, 3 insertions, 3 deletions
diff --git a/inst/doc/chemCal.tex b/inst/doc/chemCal.tex index a4b4459..4dbdce3 100644 --- a/inst/doc/chemCal.tex +++ b/inst/doc/chemCal.tex @@ -63,13 +63,13 @@ $Prediction [1] 5.865367 $`Standard Error` -[1] 10.66054 +[1] 0.892611 $Confidence -[1] 29.59840 +[1] 2.478285 $`Confidence Limits` -[1] -23.73303 35.46376 +[1] 3.387082 8.343652 \end{Soutput} \end{Schunk} |