From 69504b635d388507bce650c44b3bfe17cad3383e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: ranke <ranke@5fad18fb-23f0-0310-ab10-e59a3bee62b4>
Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 21:59:33 +0000
Subject: - Fixed the inverse prediction - Now I have a working approach for
 the calculation of LOD and LOQ,   but it seems to be different from what
 everybody else is doing   (e.g. Massart chaper 13). I like it, however. Maybe
 it even   yields a paper.

git-svn-id: http://kriemhild.uft.uni-bremen.de/svn/chemCal@8 5fad18fb-23f0-0310-ab10-e59a3bee62b4
---
 INDEX | 2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

(limited to 'INDEX')

diff --git a/INDEX b/INDEX
index 6e85292..6ad7c6d 100644
--- a/INDEX
+++ b/INDEX
@@ -3,5 +3,7 @@ calplot                 Plot calibration graphs from univariate linear
 chemCal-package         Calibration functions for analytical chemistry
 din32645                Calibration data from DIN 32645
 inverse.predict         Predict x from y for a linear calibration
+lod                     Estimate a limit of detection (LOD) or
+                        quantification (LOQ)
 massart97ex3            Calibration data from Massart et al. (1997),
                         example 3
-- 
cgit v1.2.1