From 73e650114af77582238abf5273e63005e0b2287e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Johannes Ranke Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2017 17:00:48 +0100 Subject: Static documentation now built by pkgdown::build_site() --- docs/din32645.html | 188 ----------------------------------------------------- 1 file changed, 188 deletions(-) delete mode 100644 docs/din32645.html (limited to 'docs/din32645.html') diff --git a/docs/din32645.html b/docs/din32645.html deleted file mode 100644 index 8266a10..0000000 --- a/docs/din32645.html +++ /dev/null @@ -1,188 +0,0 @@ - - - - -din32645. chemCal 0.1-37 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
-
-
- chemCal 0.1-37 -
- -
-
-
-
- - -
-
- -
- -

Calibration data from DIN 32645

- -
-
-

Usage

- 
data(din32645)
- -
-

Description

- -

Sample dataset to test the package.

- -
- -
-

Format

- -

A dataframe containing 10 rows of x and y values.

- -
- -
-

References

- -

DIN 32645 (equivalent to ISO 11843), Beuth Verlag, Berlin, 1994

- -

Dintest. Plugin for MS Excel for evaluations of calibration data. Written - by Georg Schmitt, University of Heidelberg. Formerly available from - the Website of the University of Heidelberg.

- -

Currie, L. A. (1997) Nomenclature in evaluation of analytical methods including - detection and quantification capabilities (IUPAC Recommendations 1995). - Analytica Chimica Acta 391, 105 - 126.

- -
- -

Examples

- 
data(din32645)
-m <- lm(y ~ x, data = din32645)
-calplot(m)

-

-

-## Prediction of x with confidence interval
-(prediction <- inverse.predict(m, 3500, alpha = 0.01))

-
$Prediction
-[1] 0.1054792
-
-$`Standard Error`
-[1] 0.02215619
-
-$Confidence
-[1] 0.07434261
-
-$`Confidence Limits`
-[1] 0.03113656 0.17982178
-
-

-

-# This should give 0.07434 according to test data from Dintest, which 
-# was collected from Procontrol 3.1 (isomehr GmbH) in this case
-round(prediction$Confidence,5)

-
[1] 0.07434
-

-

-## Critical value:
-(crit <- lod(m, alpha = 0.01, beta = 0.5))

-
$x
-[1] 0.0698127
-
-$y
-       1 
-3155.393 
-
-

-

-# According to DIN 32645, we should get 0.07 for the critical value
-# (decision limit, "Nachweisgrenze")
-round(crit$x, 2)

-
[1] 0.07
-

-
# and according to Dintest test data, we should get 0.0698 from
-round(crit$x, 4)

-
[1] 0.0698
-

-

-## Limit of detection (smallest detectable value given alpha and beta)
-# In German, the smallest detectable value is the "Erfassungsgrenze", and we
-# should get 0.14 according to DIN, which we achieve by using the method 
-# described in it:
-lod.din <- lod(m, alpha = 0.01, beta = 0.01, method = "din")
-round(lod.din$x, 2)

-
[1] 0.14
-

-

-## Limit of quantification
-# This accords to the test data coming with the test data from Dintest again, 
-# except for the last digits of the value cited for Procontrol 3.1 (0.2121)
-(loq <- loq(m, alpha = 0.01))

-
$x
-[1] 0.2119575
-
-$y
-       1 
-4528.787 
-
-

-
round(loq$x,4)

-
[1] 0.212
-

-

-# A similar value is obtained using the approximation 
-# LQ = 3.04 * LC (Currie 1999, p. 120)
-3.04 * lod(m,alpha = 0.01, beta = 0.5)$x

-
[1] 0.2122306
-
-
-
- - - - - -
-
- - -
- - \ No newline at end of file -- cgit v1.2.1