From 280d36230052de4f94e384648c1283031fbc9840 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Johannes Ranke Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2018 17:29:14 +0200 Subject: Fix inverse predictions for replicate measurements For details, see NEWS.md --- docs/reference/loq.html | 31 ++++++++++++++++++------------- 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) (limited to 'docs/reference/loq.html') diff --git a/docs/reference/loq.html b/docs/reference/loq.html index 09567db..eee0925 100644 --- a/docs/reference/loq.html +++ b/docs/reference/loq.html @@ -67,17 +67,26 @@ chemCal - 0.1.37.9001 + 0.2.1 @@ -150,7 +159,7 @@ w.loq

The weight that should be attributed to the LOQ. Defaults to one for unweighted regression, and to the mean of the weights - for weighted regression. See massart97ex3 for + for weighted regression. See massart97ex3 for an example how to take advantage of knowledge about the variance function.

@@ -180,27 +189,23 @@

See also

-

Examples for din32645

+

Examples for din32645

Examples

-
data(massart97ex3) -attach(massart97ex3) -m <- lm(y ~ x) +
m <- lm(y ~ x, data = massart97ex1) loq(m)
#> $x #> [1] 13.97764 #> #> $y -#> 1 -#> 30.6235 +#> [1] 30.6235 #>
# We can get better by using replicate measurements loq(m, n = 3)
#> $x #> [1] 9.971963 #> #> $y -#> 1 -#> 22.68539 +#> [1] 22.68539 #>