blob: 722343473a265350ffb28a9ef36a165f6ac02e60 (
plain) (
tree)
|
|
ℹ Testing mkin
✔ | F W S OK | Context
✔ | 5 | AIC calculation
✔ | 5 | Analytical solutions for coupled models [1.5s]
✔ | 5 | Calculation of Akaike weights
✔ | 3 | Export dataset for reading into CAKE
✔ | 6 | Use of precompiled symbols in mkinpredict [3.1s]
✔ | 12 | Confidence intervals and p-values [0.4s]
✔ | 1 12 | Dimethenamid data from 2018 [12.9s]
────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
Skip ('test_dmta.R:88:3'): Different backends get consistent results for SFO-SFO3+, dimethenamid data
Reason: Fitting this ODE model with saemix takes about 5 minutes on my new system
────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
✔ | 14 | Error model fitting [2.3s]
✔ | 5 | Time step normalisation
✔ | 4 | Calculation of FOCUS chi2 error levels [0.3s]
✔ | 14 | Results for FOCUS D established in expertise for UBA (Ranke 2014) [0.4s]
✔ | 4 | Test fitting the decline of metabolites from their maximum [0.2s]
✔ | 1 | Fitting the logistic model [0.1s]
✔ | 10 | Batch fitting and diagnosing hierarchical kinetic models [19.0s]
✔ | 2 16 | Nonlinear mixed-effects models [148.3s]
────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
Skip ('test_mixed.R:80:3'): saemix results are reproducible for biphasic fits
Reason: Fitting with saemix takes around 10 minutes when using deSolve
Skip ('test_mixed.R:133:3'): SFO-SFO saemix specific analytical solution work
Reason: This is seldom used, so save some time
────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
✔ | 3 | Test dataset classes mkinds and mkindsg
✔ | 10 | Special cases of mkinfit calls [0.3s]
✔ | 3 | mkinfit features [0.5s]
✔ | 8 | mkinmod model generation and printing
✔ | 3 | Model predictions with mkinpredict [0.1s]
✖ | 3 9 | Multistart method for saem.mmkin models [22.9s]
────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
Failure ('test_multistart.R:44:3'): multistart works for saem.mmkin models
Snapshot of `testcase` to 'multistart/mixed-model-fit-for-saem-object-with-mkin-transformations.svg' has changed
Run `testthat::snapshot_review('multistart/')` to review changes
Backtrace:
1. vdiffr::expect_doppelganger(...)
at test_multistart.R:44:2
3. testthat::expect_snapshot_file(...)
Failure ('test_multistart.R:55:3'): multistart works for saem.mmkin models
Snapshot of `testcase` to 'multistart/llhist-for-dfop-sfo-fit.svg' has changed
Run `testthat::snapshot_review('multistart/')` to review changes
Backtrace:
1. vdiffr::expect_doppelganger("llhist for dfop sfo fit", llhist_dfop_sfo)
at test_multistart.R:55:2
3. testthat::expect_snapshot_file(...)
Failure ('test_multistart.R:56:3'): multistart works for saem.mmkin models
Snapshot of `testcase` to 'multistart/parplot-for-dfop-sfo-fit.svg' has changed
Run `testthat::snapshot_review('multistart/')` to review changes
Backtrace:
1. vdiffr::expect_doppelganger("parplot for dfop sfo fit", parplot_dfop_sfo)
at test_multistart.R:56:2
3. testthat::expect_snapshot_file(...)
────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
✔ | 16 | Evaluations according to 2015 NAFTA guidance [1.5s]
✔ | 9 | Nonlinear mixed-effects models with nlme [3.7s]
✖ | 1 14 | Plotting [4.6s]
────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
Failure ('test_plot.R:55:3'): Plotting mkinfit, mmkin and mixed model objects is reproducible
Snapshot of `testcase` to 'plot/mixed-model-fit-for-nlme-object.svg' has changed
Run `testthat::snapshot_review('plot/')` to review changes
Backtrace:
1. vdiffr::expect_doppelganger(...)
at test_plot.R:55:2
3. testthat::expect_snapshot_file(...)
────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
✔ | 4 | Residuals extracted from mkinfit models
✔ | 1 36 | saemix parent models [31.2s]
────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
Skip ('test_saemix_parent.R:143:3'): We can also use mkin solution methods for saem
Reason: This still takes almost 2.5 minutes although we do not solve ODEs
────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
✔ | 2 | Complex test case from Schaefer et al. (2007) Piacenza paper [0.5s]
✔ | 11 | Processing of residue series
✔ | 10 | Fitting the SFORB model [1.7s]
✔ | 1 | Summaries of old mkinfit objects
✔ | 5 | Summary
✔ | 4 | Results for synthetic data established in expertise for UBA (Ranke 2014) [0.8s]
✔ | 9 | Hypothesis tests [2.9s]
✔ | 4 | Calculation of maximum time weighted average concentrations (TWAs) [0.7s]
══ Results ═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
Duration: 260.5 s
── Skipped tests ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
• Fitting this ODE model with saemix takes about 5 minutes on my new system (1)
• Fitting with saemix takes around 10 minutes when using deSolve (1)
• This is seldom used, so save some time (1)
• This still takes almost 2.5 minutes although we do not solve ODEs (1)
[ FAIL 4 | WARN 0 | SKIP 4 | PASS 277 ]
|
