context("Dimethenamid data from 2018")
# Data
dmta_ds <- lapply(1:7, function(i) {
ds_i <- dimethenamid_2018$ds[[i]]$data
ds_i[ds_i$name == "DMTAP", "name"] <- "DMTA"
ds_i$time <- ds_i$time * dimethenamid_2018$f_time_norm[i]
ds_i
})
names(dmta_ds) <- sapply(dimethenamid_2018$ds, function(ds) ds$title)
dmta_ds[["Elliot"]] <- rbind(dmta_ds[["Elliot 1"]], dmta_ds[["Elliot 2"]])
dmta_ds[["Elliot 1"]] <- dmta_ds[["Elliot 2"]] <- NULL
# mkin
dmta_dfop <- mmkin("DFOP", dmta_ds, quiet = TRUE)
dmta_dfop_tc <- mmkin("DFOP", dmta_ds, error_model = "tc", quiet = TRUE)
test_that("Different backends get consistent results for DFOP tc, dimethenamid data", {
# nlme
expect_warning(
nlme_dfop_tc <- nlme(dmta_dfop_tc),
"Iteration 3, .* false convergence")
ints_nlme <- intervals(nlme_dfop_tc)
# saemix
saem_saemix_dfop_tc <- saem(dmta_dfop_tc)
ints_saemix <- intervals(saem_saemix_dfop_tc)
# saemix mkin transformations
saem_saemix_dfop_tc_mkin <- saem(dmta_dfop_tc, transformations = "mkin")
ints_saemix_mkin <- intervals(saem_saemix_dfop_tc_mkin)
# nlmixr saem
saem_nlmixr_dfop_tc <- nlmixr(dmta_dfop_tc, est = "saem",
control = nlmixr::saemControl(nBurn = 300, nEm = 100, nmc = 9, print = 0))
ints_nlmixr_saem <- intervals(saem_nlmixr_dfop_tc)
# nlmixr focei
# We get three warnings about nudged etas, the initial optimization and
# gradient problems with initial estimate and covariance
# We need to capture output, otherwise it pops up in testthat output
expect_warning(tmp <- capture_output(focei_nlmixr_dfop_tc <- nlmixr(
dmta_dfop_tc, est = "focei",
control = nlmixr::foceiControl(print = 0), all = TRUE)))
ints_nlmixr_focei <- intervals(focei_nlmixr_dfop_tc)
# Fixed effects
## saemix vs. nlme
expect_true(all(ints_saemix$fixed[, "est."] >
backtransform_odeparms(ints_nlme$fixed[, "lower"], dmta_dfop$mkinmod)))
expect_true(all(ints_saemix$fixed[, "est."] <
backtransform_odeparms(ints_nlme$fixed[, "upper"], dmta_dfop$mkinmod)))
## saemix mkin vs. nlme
expect_true(all(ints_saemix_mkin$fixed[, "est."] >
backtransform_odeparms(ints_nlme$fixed[, "lower"], dmta_dfop$mkinmod)))
expect_true(all(ints_saemix_mkin$fixed[, "est."] <
backtransform_odeparms(ints_nlme$fixed[, "upper"], dmta_dfop$mkinmod)))
## nlmixr saem vs. nlme
expect_true(all(ints_nlmixr_saem$fixed[, "est."] >
backtransform_odeparms(ints_nlme$fixed[, "lower"], dmta_dfop$mkinmod)))
expect_true(all(ints_nlmixr_saem$fixed[, "est."] <
backtransform_odeparms(ints_nlme$fixed[, "upper"], dmta_dfop$mkinmod)))
## nlmixr focei vs. nlme
expect_true(all(ints_nlmixr_focei$fixed[, "est."] >
backtransform_odeparms(ints_nlme$fixed[, "lower"], dmta_dfop$mkinmod)))
expect_true(all(ints_nlmixr_focei$fixed[, "est."] <
backtransform_odeparms(ints_nlme$fixed[, "upper"], dmta_dfop$mkinmod)))
# Random effects
## for saemix with saemix transformations, the comparison would be complicated...
## saemix mkin vs. nlme
expect_true(all(ints_saemix$random[, "est."] >
backtransform_odeparms(ints_nlme$reStruct$ds[, "lower"], dmta_dfop$mkinmod)))
expect_true(all(ints_saemix$fixed[, "est."] <
backtransform_odeparms(ints_nlme$fixed[, "upper"], dmta_dfop$mkinmod)))
## nlmixr saem vs. nlme
expect_true(all(ints_nlmixr_saem$random[, "est."] >
backtransform_odeparms(ints_nlme$reStruct$ds[, "lower"], dmta_dfop$mkinmod)))
expect_true(all(ints_nlmixr_saem$random[, "est."] <
backtransform_odeparms(ints_nlme$reStruct$ds[, "upper"], dmta_dfop$mkinmod)))
## nlmixr focei vs. nlme
expect_true(all(ints_nlmixr_focei$random[, "est."] >
backtransform_odeparms(ints_nlme$reStruct$ds[, "lower"], dmta_dfop$mkinmod)))
expect_true(all(ints_nlmixr_focei$random[, "est."] <
backtransform_odeparms(ints_nlme$reStruct$ds[, "upper"], dmta_dfop$mkinmod)))
# Variance function
# Some of these tests on error model parameters fail on Travis and Winbuilder
skip_on_travis()
skip_on_cran()
# saemix vs. nlme
expect_true(all(ints_saemix[[3]][, "est."] >
ints_nlme$varStruct[, "lower"]))
expect_true(all(ints_saemix[[3]][, "est."] <
ints_nlme$varStruct[, "upper"]))
# saemix with mkin transformations vs. nlme
expect_true(all(ints_saemix_mkin[[3]][, "est."] >
ints_nlme$varStruct[, "lower"]))
expect_true(all(ints_saemix_mkin[[3]][, "est."] <
ints_nlme$varStruct[, "upper"]))
# nlmixr saem vs. nlme
expect_true(all(ints_nlmixr_saem[[3]][, "est."] >
ints_nlme$varStruct[, "lower"]))
expect_true(all(ints_nlmixr_saem[[3]][, "est."] <
ints_nlme$varStruct[, "upper"]))
# nlmixr focei vs. nlme
# We only test for the proportional part (rsd_high), as the
# constant part (sigma_low) obtained with nlmixr/FOCEI is below the lower
# bound of the confidence interval obtained with nlme
expect_true(ints_nlmixr_focei[[3]]["rsd_high", "est."] >
ints_nlme$varStruct["prop", "lower"])
expect_true(ints_nlmixr_focei[[3]]["rsd_high", "est."] <
ints_nlme$varStruct["prop", "upper"])
})
# Compared to the 2020 paper https://doi.org/10.3390/environments8080071
# the data are different, as there was an error in the handling of the
# Borstel data in the mkin package at the time.
# The model called DFOP-SFO3+ in the paper appears to be overparameterised with
# the corrected data, we get lots of problems trying to use it with mmkin, nlme
# and saemix
sfo_sfo3p <- mkinmod(
DMTA = mkinsub("SFO", c("M23", "M27", "M31")),
M23 = mkinsub("SFO"),
M27 = mkinsub("SFO"),
M31 = mkinsub("SFO", "M27", sink = FALSE),
quiet = TRUE
)
dmta_sfo_sfo3p_tc <- mmkin(list("SFO-SFO3+" = sfo_sfo3p),
dmta_ds, error_model = "tc", quiet = TRUE)
test_that("Different backends get consistent results for SFO-SFO3+, dimethenamid data", {
expect_warning(nlme_sfo_sfo3p_tc <- nlme(dmta_sfo_sfo3p_tc,
start = mean_degparms(dmta_sfo_sfo3p_tc, test_log_parms = TRUE)),
"Iteration 5, LME step.*not converge")
ints_nlme_mets <- intervals(nlme_sfo_sfo3p_tc, which = "fixed")
# The saem fit with nlmixr takes only about 15 seconds
tmp <- capture.output(
saem_nlmixr_sfo_sfo3p_tc <- nlmixr(dmta_sfo_sfo3p_tc, est = "saem",
control = nlmixr::saemControl(print = 0)))
ints_nlmixr_saem_mets <- intervals(saem_nlmixr_sfo_sfo3p_tc)
# We need to exclude the ilr transformed formation fractions in these
# tests, as they do not have a one to one relation in the transformations
expect_true(all(ints_nlmixr_saem_mets$fixed[, "est."][-c(6, 7, 8)] >
backtransform_odeparms(ints_nlme_mets$fixed[, "lower"][-c(6, 7, 8)], sfo_sfo3p)))
expect_true(all(ints_nlmixr_saem_mets$fixed[, "est."][-c(6, 7, 8)] <
backtransform_odeparms(ints_nlme_mets$fixed[, "upper"], sfo_sfo3p)[-c(6, 7, 8)]))
skip("Fitting this ODE model with saemix takes about 15 minutes on my system")
# As DFOP is overparameterised and leads to instabilities and errors, we
# need to use SFO.
# saem_saemix_sfo_sfo3p_tc <- saem(dmta_sfo_sfo3p_tc)
# The fit above, using SFO for the parent leads to low values of DMTA_0
# (confidence interval from 84.4 to 92.8) which is not consistent with what
# we know about this value. Therefore, we fix it to the initial estimate
# obtained from the separate fits (95.6)
saem_saemix_sfo_sfo3p_tc_DMTA_0_fixed <- saem(dmta_sfo_sfo3p_tc,
fixed.estim = c(0, rep(1, 7)))
ints_saemix_mets <- intervals(saem_saemix_sfo_sfo3p_tc_DMTA_0_fixed)
# Again, we need to exclude the ilr transformed formation fractions in these
# tests, as they do not have a one to one relation in the transformations
expect_true(all(ints_saemix_mets$fixed[, "est."][-c(6, 7, 8)] >
backtransform_odeparms(ints_nlme_mets$fixed[, "lower"][-c(6, 7, 8)], sfo_sfo3p)))
expect_true(all(ints_saemix_mets$fixed[, "est."][-c(6, 7, 8)] <
backtransform_odeparms(ints_nlme_mets$fixed[, "upper"], sfo_sfo3p)[-c(6, 7, 8)]))
})
