Static documentation rebuilt by pkgdown::build_site()

1 files changed, 9 insertions, 9 deletions

diff --git a/docs/articles/FOCUS_L.html b/docs/articles/FOCUS_L.html
index 353f1484..5d586799 100644
--- a/docs/articles/FOCUS_L.html
+++ b/docs/articles/FOCUS_L.html
@@ -138,16 +138,16 @@ FOCUS_2006_L1_mkin &lt;-<span class="st"> </span><span class="kw"><a href="../re
 ##    30   parent      4.0     5.251  -1.2513</code></pre>
 <p>A plot of the fit is obtained with the plot function for mkinfit objects.</p>
 <div class="sourceCode"><pre class="sourceCode r"><code class="sourceCode r"><span class="kw">plot</span>(m.L1.SFO, <span class="dt">show_errmin =</span> <span class="ot">TRUE</span>, <span class="dt">main =</span> <span class="st">"FOCUS L1 - SFO"</span>)</code></pre></div>
-<p><img src="FOCUS_L_files/figure-html/unnamed-chunk-4-1.png" width="576"></p>
+<p><img src="/home/jranke/git/mkin/docs/articles/FOCUS_L_files/figure-html/unnamed-chunk-4-1.png" width="576"></p>
 <p>The residual plot can be easily obtained by</p>
 <div class="sourceCode"><pre class="sourceCode r"><code class="sourceCode r"><span class="kw"><a href="../reference/mkinresplot.html">mkinresplot</a></span>(m.L1.SFO, <span class="dt">ylab =</span> <span class="st">"Observed"</span>, <span class="dt">xlab =</span> <span class="st">"Time"</span>)</code></pre></div>
-<p><img src="FOCUS_L_files/figure-html/unnamed-chunk-5-1.png" width="576"></p>
+<p><img src="/home/jranke/git/mkin/docs/articles/FOCUS_L_files/figure-html/unnamed-chunk-5-1.png" width="576"></p>
 <p>For comparison, the FOMC model is fitted as well, and the <span class="math inline">\(\chi^2\)</span> error level is checked.</p>
 <div class="sourceCode"><pre class="sourceCode r"><code class="sourceCode r">m.L1.FOMC &lt;-<span class="st"> </span><span class="kw"><a href="../reference/mkinfit.html">mkinfit</a></span>(<span class="st">"FOMC"</span>, FOCUS_2006_L1_mkin, <span class="dt">quiet=</span><span class="ot">TRUE</span>)</code></pre></div>
 <pre><code>## Warning in mkinfit("FOMC", FOCUS_2006_L1_mkin, quiet = TRUE): Optimisation by method Port did not converge.
 ## Convergence code is 1</code></pre>
 <div class="sourceCode"><pre class="sourceCode r"><code class="sourceCode r"><span class="kw">plot</span>(m.L1.FOMC, <span class="dt">show_errmin =</span> <span class="ot">TRUE</span>, <span class="dt">main =</span> <span class="st">"FOCUS L1 - FOMC"</span>)</code></pre></div>
-<p><img src="FOCUS_L_files/figure-html/unnamed-chunk-6-1.png" width="576"></p>
+<p><img src="/home/jranke/git/mkin/docs/articles/FOCUS_L_files/figure-html/unnamed-chunk-6-1.png" width="576"></p>
 <div class="sourceCode"><pre class="sourceCode r"><code class="sourceCode r"><span class="kw">summary</span>(m.L1.FOMC, <span class="dt">data =</span> <span class="ot">FALSE</span>)</code></pre></div>
 <pre><code>## mkin version:    0.9.44.9000 
 ## R version:       3.3.1 
@@ -233,7 +233,7 @@ FOCUS_2006_L2_mkin &lt;-<span class="st"> </span><span class="kw"><a href="../re
 <div class="sourceCode"><pre class="sourceCode r"><code class="sourceCode r">m.L2.SFO &lt;-<span class="st"> </span><span class="kw"><a href="../reference/mkinfit.html">mkinfit</a></span>(<span class="st">"SFO"</span>, FOCUS_2006_L2_mkin, <span class="dt">quiet=</span><span class="ot">TRUE</span>)
 <span class="kw">plot</span>(m.L2.SFO, <span class="dt">show_residuals =</span> <span class="ot">TRUE</span>, <span class="dt">show_errmin =</span> <span class="ot">TRUE</span>, 
      <span class="dt">main =</span> <span class="st">"FOCUS L2 - SFO"</span>)</code></pre></div>
-<p><img src="FOCUS_L_files/figure-html/unnamed-chunk-8-1.png" width="672"></p>
+<p><img src="/home/jranke/git/mkin/docs/articles/FOCUS_L_files/figure-html/unnamed-chunk-8-1.png" width="672"></p>
 <p>The <span class="math inline">\(\chi^2\)</span> error level of 14% suggests that the model does not fit very well. This is also obvious from the plots of the fit, in which we have included the residual plot.</p>
 <p>In the FOCUS kinetics report, it is stated that there is no apparent systematic error observed from the residual plot up to the measured DT90 (approximately at day 5), and there is an underestimation beyond that point.</p>
 <p>We may add that it is difficult to judge the random nature of the residuals just from the three samplings at days 0, 1 and 3. Also, it is not clear <em>a priori</em> why a consistent underestimation after the approximate DT90 should be irrelevant. However, this can be rationalised by the fact that the FOCUS fate models generally only implement SFO kinetics.</p>
@@ -244,7 +244,7 @@ FOCUS_2006_L2_mkin &lt;-<span class="st"> </span><span class="kw"><a href="../re
 <div class="sourceCode"><pre class="sourceCode r"><code class="sourceCode r">m.L2.FOMC &lt;-<span class="st"> </span><span class="kw"><a href="../reference/mkinfit.html">mkinfit</a></span>(<span class="st">"FOMC"</span>, FOCUS_2006_L2_mkin, <span class="dt">quiet =</span> <span class="ot">TRUE</span>)
 <span class="kw">plot</span>(m.L2.FOMC, <span class="dt">show_residuals =</span> <span class="ot">TRUE</span>,
      <span class="dt">main =</span> <span class="st">"FOCUS L2 - FOMC"</span>)</code></pre></div>
-<p><img src="FOCUS_L_files/figure-html/unnamed-chunk-9-1.png" width="672"></p>
+<p><img src="/home/jranke/git/mkin/docs/articles/FOCUS_L_files/figure-html/unnamed-chunk-9-1.png" width="672"></p>
 <div class="sourceCode"><pre class="sourceCode r"><code class="sourceCode r"><span class="kw">summary</span>(m.L2.FOMC, <span class="dt">data =</span> <span class="ot">FALSE</span>)</code></pre></div>
 <pre><code>## mkin version:    0.9.44.9000 
 ## R version:       3.3.1 
@@ -314,7 +314,7 @@ FOCUS_2006_L2_mkin &lt;-<span class="st"> </span><span class="kw"><a href="../re
 <div class="sourceCode"><pre class="sourceCode r"><code class="sourceCode r">m.L2.DFOP &lt;-<span class="st"> </span><span class="kw"><a href="../reference/mkinfit.html">mkinfit</a></span>(<span class="st">"DFOP"</span>, FOCUS_2006_L2_mkin, <span class="dt">quiet =</span> <span class="ot">TRUE</span>)
 <span class="kw">plot</span>(m.L2.DFOP, <span class="dt">show_residuals =</span> <span class="ot">TRUE</span>, <span class="dt">show_errmin =</span> <span class="ot">TRUE</span>,
      <span class="dt">main =</span> <span class="st">"FOCUS L2 - DFOP"</span>)</code></pre></div>
-<p><img src="FOCUS_L_files/figure-html/unnamed-chunk-10-1.png" width="672"></p>
+<p><img src="/home/jranke/git/mkin/docs/articles/FOCUS_L_files/figure-html/unnamed-chunk-10-1.png" width="672"></p>
 <div class="sourceCode"><pre class="sourceCode r"><code class="sourceCode r"><span class="kw">summary</span>(m.L2.DFOP, <span class="dt">data =</span> <span class="ot">FALSE</span>)</code></pre></div>
 <pre><code>## mkin version:    0.9.44.9000 
 ## R version:       3.3.1 
@@ -397,7 +397,7 @@ FOCUS_2006_L3_mkin &lt;-<span class="st"> </span><span class="kw"><a href="../re
 mm.L3 &lt;-<span class="st"> </span><span class="kw"><a href="../reference/mmkin.html">mmkin</a></span>(<span class="kw">c</span>(<span class="st">"SFO"</span>, <span class="st">"FOMC"</span>, <span class="st">"DFOP"</span>), <span class="dt">cores =</span> <span class="dv">1</span>,
                <span class="kw">list</span>(<span class="st">"FOCUS L3"</span> =<span class="st"> </span>FOCUS_2006_L3_mkin), <span class="dt">quiet =</span> <span class="ot">TRUE</span>)
 <span class="kw">plot</span>(mm.L3)</code></pre></div>
-<p><img src="FOCUS_L_files/figure-html/unnamed-chunk-12-1.png" width="672"></p>
+<p><img src="/home/jranke/git/mkin/docs/articles/FOCUS_L_files/figure-html/unnamed-chunk-12-1.png" width="672"></p>
 <p>The <span class="math inline">\(\chi^2\)</span> error level of 21% as well as the plot suggest that the SFO model does not fit very well. The FOMC model performs better, with an error level at which the <span class="math inline">\(\chi^2\)</span> test passes of 7%. Fitting the four parameter DFOP model further reduces the <span class="math inline">\(\chi^2\)</span> error level considerably.</p>
 </div>
 <div id="accessing-elements-of-mmkin-objects" class="section level2">
@@ -484,7 +484,7 @@ mm.L3 &lt;-<span class="st"> </span><span class="kw"><a href="../reference/mmkin
 ##    91   parent     15.0     15.18 -0.18181
 ##   120   parent     12.0     10.19  1.81395</code></pre>
 <div class="sourceCode"><pre class="sourceCode r"><code class="sourceCode r"><span class="kw">plot</span>(mm.L3[[<span class="st">"DFOP"</span>, <span class="dv">1</span>]], <span class="dt">show_errmin =</span> <span class="ot">TRUE</span>)</code></pre></div>
-<p><img src="FOCUS_L_files/figure-html/unnamed-chunk-13-1.png" width="672"></p>
+<p><img src="/home/jranke/git/mkin/docs/articles/FOCUS_L_files/figure-html/unnamed-chunk-13-1.png" width="672"></p>
 <p>Here, a look to the model plot, the confidence intervals of the parameters and the correlation matrix suggest that the parameter estimates are reliable, and the DFOP model can be used as the best-fit model based on the <span class="math inline">\(\chi^2\)</span> error level criterion for laboratory data L3.</p>
 <p>This is also an example where the standard t-test for the parameter <code>g_ilr</code> is misleading, as it tests for a significant difference from zero. In this case, zero appears to be the correct value for this parameter, and the confidence interval for the backtransformed parameter <code>g</code> is quite narrow.</p>
 </div>
@@ -502,7 +502,7 @@ mm.L4 &lt;-<span class="st"> </span><span class="kw"><a href="../reference/mmkin
                <span class="kw">list</span>(<span class="st">"FOCUS L4"</span> =<span class="st"> </span>FOCUS_2006_L4_mkin), 
                <span class="dt">quiet =</span> <span class="ot">TRUE</span>)
 <span class="kw">plot</span>(mm.L4)</code></pre></div>
-<p><img src="FOCUS_L_files/figure-html/unnamed-chunk-15-1.png" width="672"></p>
+<p><img src="/home/jranke/git/mkin/docs/articles/FOCUS_L_files/figure-html/unnamed-chunk-15-1.png" width="672"></p>
 <p>The <span class="math inline">\(\chi^2\)</span> error level of 3.3% as well as the plot suggest that the SFO model fits very well. The error level at which the <span class="math inline">\(\chi^2\)</span> test passes is slightly lower for the FOMC model. However, the difference appears negligible.</p>
 <div class="sourceCode"><pre class="sourceCode r"><code class="sourceCode r"><span class="kw">summary</span>(mm.L4[[<span class="st">"SFO"</span>, <span class="dv">1</span>]], <span class="dt">data =</span> <span class="ot">FALSE</span>)</code></pre></div>
 <pre><code>## mkin version:    0.9.44.9000