aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/log/test.log
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorJohannes Ranke <jranke@uni-bremen.de>2022-11-16 09:15:36 +0100
committerJohannes Ranke <jranke@uni-bremen.de>2022-11-16 09:15:36 +0100
commit51d63256a7b3020ee11931d61b4db97b9ded02c0 (patch)
treecb6d628211c99cb6dd1938428a18ef4dd5a997dc /log/test.log
parent679cf716192cdfd91dfd232578cbd4e30d7eac12 (diff)
We get about 25% performance gain
with the custom lsoda call, avoiding repeated getNativeSymbolInfo calls. It's just that we should not be calling foreign functions from different packages, because the may change without notice. Using getNativeSymbolInfo for "call_lsoda" avoids the CRAN note, and a similar call could probably be used for "unlock_solver", avoiding the NOTE in checks for cran, but we should not do this in a CRAN package.
Diffstat (limited to 'log/test.log')
-rw-r--r--log/test.log34
1 files changed, 17 insertions, 17 deletions
diff --git a/log/test.log b/log/test.log
index 7005ac37..10c0aa76 100644
--- a/log/test.log
+++ b/log/test.log
@@ -1,22 +1,22 @@
ℹ Testing mkin
✔ | F W S OK | Context
✔ | 5 | AIC calculation
-✔ | 5 | Analytical solutions for coupled models [3.2s]
+✔ | 5 | Analytical solutions for coupled models [2.9s]
✔ | 5 | Calculation of Akaike weights
✔ | 3 | Export dataset for reading into CAKE
✔ | 12 | Confidence intervals and p-values [1.0s]
-✔ | 1 12 | Dimethenamid data from 2018 [32.4s]
+✔ | 1 12 | Dimethenamid data from 2018 [29.5s]
────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
-Skip ('test_dmta.R:98'): Different backends get consistent results for SFO-SFO3+, dimethenamid data
+Skip ('test_dmta.R:99'): Different backends get consistent results for SFO-SFO3+, dimethenamid data
Reason: Fitting this ODE model with saemix takes about 15 minutes on my system
────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
✔ | 14 | Error model fitting [4.9s]
✔ | 5 | Time step normalisation
✔ | 4 | Calculation of FOCUS chi2 error levels [0.6s]
-✔ | 14 | Results for FOCUS D established in expertise for UBA (Ranke 2014) [0.8s]
-✔ | 4 | Test fitting the decline of metabolites from their maximum [0.4s]
+✔ | 14 | Results for FOCUS D established in expertise for UBA (Ranke 2014) [0.7s]
+✔ | 4 | Test fitting the decline of metabolites from their maximum [0.3s]
✔ | 1 | Fitting the logistic model [0.2s]
-✔ | 10 | Batch fitting and diagnosing hierarchical kinetic models [24.2s]
+✔ | 10 | Batch fitting and diagnosing hierarchical kinetic models [24.7s]
✔ | 1 12 | Nonlinear mixed-effects models [0.3s]
────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
Skip ('test_mixed.R:74'): saemix results are reproducible for biphasic fits
@@ -26,28 +26,28 @@ Reason: Fitting with saemix takes around 10 minutes when using deSolve
✔ | 10 | Special cases of mkinfit calls [0.5s]
✔ | 3 | mkinfit features [0.7s]
✔ | 8 | mkinmod model generation and printing [0.2s]
-✔ | 3 | Model predictions with mkinpredict [0.3s]
-✔ | 7 | Multistart method for saem.mmkin models [36.9s]
-✔ | 16 | Evaluations according to 2015 NAFTA guidance [2.3s]
-✔ | 9 | Nonlinear mixed-effects models with nlme [8.6s]
-✔ | 16 | Plotting [9.8s]
+✔ | 3 | Model predictions with mkinpredict [0.4s]
+✔ | 7 | Multistart method for saem.mmkin models [36.8s]
+✔ | 16 | Evaluations according to 2015 NAFTA guidance [2.5s]
+✔ | 9 | Nonlinear mixed-effects models with nlme [8.8s]
+✔ | 16 | Plotting [10.0s]
✔ | 4 | Residuals extracted from mkinfit models
-✔ | 1 36 | saemix parent models [66.3s]
+✔ | 1 36 | saemix parent models [66.1s]
────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
Skip ('test_saemix_parent.R:143'): We can also use mkin solution methods for saem
Reason: This still takes almost 2.5 minutes although we do not solve ODEs
────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
-✔ | 2 | Complex test case from Schaefer et al. (2007) Piacenza paper [1.4s]
+✔ | 2 | Complex test case from Schaefer et al. (2007) Piacenza paper [1.1s]
✔ | 11 | Processing of residue series
-✔ | 10 | Fitting the SFORB model [3.7s]
+✔ | 10 | Fitting the SFORB model [3.4s]
✔ | 1 | Summaries of old mkinfit objects
✔ | 5 | Summary [0.2s]
-✔ | 4 | Results for synthetic data established in expertise for UBA (Ranke 2014) [2.2s]
-✔ | 9 | Hypothesis tests [8.0s]
+✔ | 4 | Results for synthetic data established in expertise for UBA (Ranke 2014) [1.6s]
+✔ | 9 | Hypothesis tests [6.1s]
✔ | 4 | Calculation of maximum time weighted average concentrations (TWAs) [2.2s]
══ Results ═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
-Duration: 211.7 s
+Duration: 206.2 s
── Skipped tests ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
• Fitting this ODE model with saemix takes about 15 minutes on my system (1)

Contact - Imprint