Check slopes in saemix covariate models

1 files changed, 16 insertions, 25 deletions

diff --git a/log/test.log b/log/test.log
index 7614b136..af2ffc41 100644
--- a/log/test.log
+++ b/log/test.log
@@ -1,23 +1,23 @@
 ℹ Testing mkin
 ✔ | F W S  OK | Context
 ✔ |         5 | AIC calculation
-✔ |         5 | Analytical solutions for coupled models [3.2s]
+✔ |         5 | Analytical solutions for coupled models [3.4s]
 ✔ |         5 | Calculation of Akaike weights
 ✔ |         3 | Export dataset for reading into CAKE
 ✔ |        12 | Confidence intervals and p-values [1.1s]
-✔ |     1  12 | Dimethenamid data from 2018 [32.0s]
+✔ |     1  12 | Dimethenamid data from 2018 [32.7s]
 ────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
 Skip ('test_dmta.R:98'): Different backends get consistent results for SFO-SFO3+, dimethenamid data
 Reason: Fitting this ODE model with saemix takes about 15 minutes on my system
 ────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
-✔ |        14 | Error model fitting [4.8s]
+✔ |        14 | Error model fitting [5.0s]
 ✔ |         5 | Time step normalisation
 ✔ |         4 | Calculation of FOCUS chi2 error levels [0.6s]
 ✔ |        14 | Results for FOCUS D established in expertise for UBA (Ranke 2014) [0.8s]
-✔ |         4 | Test fitting the decline of metabolites from their maximum [0.3s]
+✔ |         4 | Test fitting the decline of metabolites from their maximum [0.4s]
 ✔ |         1 | Fitting the logistic model [0.2s]
-✔ |        10 | Batch fitting and diagnosing hierarchical kinetic models [42.2s]
-✔ |     1  11 | Nonlinear mixed-effects models [13.3s]
+✔ |        10 | Batch fitting and diagnosing hierarchical kinetic models [43.4s]
+✔ |     1  11 | Nonlinear mixed-effects models [13.5s]
 ────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
 Skip ('test_mixed.R:78'): saemix results are reproducible for biphasic fits
 Reason: Fitting with saemix takes around 10 minutes when using deSolve
@@ -27,40 +27,31 @@ Reason: Fitting with saemix takes around 10 minutes when using deSolve
 ✔ |         3 | mkinfit features [0.7s]
 ✔ |         8 | mkinmod model generation and printing [0.2s]
 ✔ |         3 | Model predictions with mkinpredict [0.4s]
-✖ | 1      11 | Multistart method for saem.mmkin models [46.7s]
-────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
-Failure ('test_multistart.R:56'): multistart works for saem.mmkin models
-Snapshot of `testcase` to 'multistart/parplot-for-dfop-sfo-fit.svg' has changed
-Run `testthat::snapshot_review('multistart/')` to review changes
-Backtrace:
- 1. vdiffr::expect_doppelganger("parplot for dfop sfo fit", parplot_dfop_sfo)
-      at test_multistart.R:56:2
- 3. testthat::expect_snapshot_file(...)
-────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
+✔ |        12 | Multistart method for saem.mmkin models [50.1s]
 ✔ |        16 | Evaluations according to 2015 NAFTA guidance [2.2s]
-✔ |         9 | Nonlinear mixed-effects models with nlme [9.4s]
-✔ |        15 | Plotting [10.1s]
+✔ |         9 | Nonlinear mixed-effects models with nlme [9.8s]
+✔ |        15 | Plotting [10.5s]
 ✔ |         4 | Residuals extracted from mkinfit models
-✔ |     1  36 | saemix parent models [73.6s]
+✔ |     1  36 | saemix parent models [85.7s]
 ────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
 Skip ('test_saemix_parent.R:143'): We can also use mkin solution methods for saem
 Reason: This still takes almost 2.5 minutes although we do not solve ODEs
 ────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
-✔ |         2 | Complex test case from Schaefer et al. (2007) Piacenza paper [1.4s]
+✔ |         2 | Complex test case from Schaefer et al. (2007) Piacenza paper [1.5s]
 ✔ |        11 | Processing of residue series
-✔ |        10 | Fitting the SFORB model [3.7s]
+✔ |        10 | Fitting the SFORB model [3.9s]
 ✔ |         1 | Summaries of old mkinfit objects
 ✔ |         5 | Summary [0.2s]
-✔ |         4 | Results for synthetic data established in expertise for UBA (Ranke 2014) [2.3s]
-✔ |         9 | Hypothesis tests [8.1s]
+✔ |         4 | Results for synthetic data established in expertise for UBA (Ranke 2014) [2.2s]
+✔ |         9 | Hypothesis tests [8.2s]
 ✔ |         4 | Calculation of maximum time weighted average concentrations (TWAs) [2.2s]
 
 ══ Results ═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
-Duration: 260.9 s
+Duration: 280.1 s
 
 ── Skipped tests  ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
 • Fitting this ODE model with saemix takes about 15 minutes on my system (1)
 • Fitting with saemix takes around 10 minutes when using deSolve (1)
 • This still takes almost 2.5 minutes although we do not solve ODEs (1)
 
-[ FAIL 1 | WARN 0 | SKIP 3 | PASS 269 ]
+[ FAIL 0 | WARN 0 | SKIP 3 | PASS 270 ]