Make predefined symbols safer

We still need to create a parallel processing cluster _after_ creating a
compiled model that is moved to a user defined location, at least I did
not find another way to make it work. This is not a problem with
parallel processing without a cluster, which is not available on
Windows.

1 files changed, 15 insertions, 14 deletions

diff --git a/log/test.log b/log/test.log
index c89cf02e..fa808f22 100644
--- a/log/test.log
+++ b/log/test.log
@@ -4,20 +4,21 @@
 ✔ |         5 | Analytical solutions for coupled models [1.6s]
 ✔ |         5 | Calculation of Akaike weights
 ✔ |         3 | Export dataset for reading into CAKE
+✔ |         7 | Use of precompiled symbols in mkinpredict [3.3s]
 ✔ |        12 | Confidence intervals and p-values [0.4s]
-✔ |     1  12 | Dimethenamid data from 2018 [12.2s]
+✔ |     1  12 | Dimethenamid data from 2018 [13.4s]
 ────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
-Skip ('test_dmta.R:99'): Different backends get consistent results for SFO-SFO3+, dimethenamid data
+Skip ('test_dmta.R:88'): Different backends get consistent results for SFO-SFO3+, dimethenamid data
 Reason: Fitting this ODE model with saemix takes about 15 minutes on my system
 ────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
-✔ |        14 | Error model fitting [2.4s]
+✔ |        14 | Error model fitting [2.5s]
 ✔ |         5 | Time step normalisation
 ✔ |         4 | Calculation of FOCUS chi2 error levels [0.3s]
-✔ |        14 | Results for FOCUS D established in expertise for UBA (Ranke 2014) [0.4s]
-✔ |         4 | Test fitting the decline of metabolites from their maximum [0.2s]
+✔ |        14 | Results for FOCUS D established in expertise for UBA (Ranke 2014) [0.5s]
+✔ |         4 | Test fitting the decline of metabolites from their maximum [0.3s]
 ✔ |         1 | Fitting the logistic model [0.1s]
-✔ |        10 | Batch fitting and diagnosing hierarchical kinetic models [19.5s]
-✔ |     1  11 | Nonlinear mixed-effects models [5.8s]
+✔ |        10 | Batch fitting and diagnosing hierarchical kinetic models [19.8s]
+✔ |     1  11 | Nonlinear mixed-effects models [6.1s]
 ────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
 Skip ('test_mixed.R:78'): saemix results are reproducible for biphasic fits
 Reason: Fitting with saemix takes around 10 minutes when using deSolve
@@ -27,12 +28,12 @@ Reason: Fitting with saemix takes around 10 minutes when using deSolve
 ✔ |         3 | mkinfit features [0.5s]
 ✔ |         8 | mkinmod model generation and printing
 ✔ |         3 | Model predictions with mkinpredict [0.1s]
-✔ |        12 | Multistart method for saem.mmkin models [22.0s]
-✔ |        16 | Evaluations according to 2015 NAFTA guidance [1.6s]
-✔ |         9 | Nonlinear mixed-effects models with nlme [3.9s]
-✔ |        15 | Plotting [5.1s]
+✔ |        12 | Multistart method for saem.mmkin models [21.7s]
+✔ |        16 | Evaluations according to 2015 NAFTA guidance [1.5s]
+✔ |         9 | Nonlinear mixed-effects models with nlme [3.8s]
+✔ |        15 | Plotting [4.7s]
 ✔ |         4 | Residuals extracted from mkinfit models
-✔ |     1  36 | saemix parent models [31.4s]
+✔ |     1  36 | saemix parent models [32.0s]
 ────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
 Skip ('test_saemix_parent.R:143'): We can also use mkin solution methods for saem
 Reason: This still takes almost 2.5 minutes although we do not solve ODEs
@@ -47,11 +48,11 @@ Reason: This still takes almost 2.5 minutes although we do not solve ODEs
 ✔ |         4 | Calculation of maximum time weighted average concentrations (TWAs) [0.7s]
 
 ══ Results ═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
-Duration: 115.0 s
+Duration: 120.2 s
 
 ── Skipped tests  ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
 • Fitting this ODE model with saemix takes about 15 minutes on my system (1)
 • Fitting with saemix takes around 10 minutes when using deSolve (1)
 • This still takes almost 2.5 minutes although we do not solve ODEs (1)
 
-[ FAIL 0 | WARN 0 | SKIP 3 | PASS 270 ]
+[ FAIL 0 | WARN 0 | SKIP 3 | PASS 277 ]