diff options
author | Johannes Ranke <jranke@uni-bremen.de> | 2022-09-16 11:34:34 +0200 |
---|---|---|
committer | Johannes Ranke <jranke@uni-bremen.de> | 2022-09-16 11:34:34 +0200 |
commit | 87872830f327ee427b0d229e0b9b72bae87b48df (patch) | |
tree | 23ba83c650dfd72d983c85e36a9144aa60da1037 /log | |
parent | 2a521ab0a4b7d981a2042353e2c60b8a877489b8 (diff) |
Rerun test with saemix 3.1 from CRAN
Apparently, the change I introduced into saemix
saemixdevelopment/saemixextension#34
to fix error model parameters to positive values slightly influences the
results. So this is now with the CRAN version to keep test results
in sync with Travis
Diffstat (limited to 'log')
-rw-r--r-- | log/test.log | 20 |
1 files changed, 10 insertions, 10 deletions
diff --git a/log/test.log b/log/test.log index cb123776..efa30d17 100644 --- a/log/test.log +++ b/log/test.log @@ -1,22 +1,22 @@ ℹ Testing mkin ✔ | F W S OK | Context ✔ | 5 | AIC calculation -✔ | 5 | Analytical solutions for coupled models [3.3s] +✔ | 5 | Analytical solutions for coupled models [3.4s] ✔ | 5 | Calculation of Akaike weights ✔ | 3 | Export dataset for reading into CAKE -✔ | 12 | Confidence intervals and p-values [1.1s] -✔ | 1 12 | Dimethenamid data from 2018 [32.5s] +✔ | 12 | Confidence intervals and p-values [1.0s] +✔ | 1 12 | Dimethenamid data from 2018 [31.9s] ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── Skip (test_dmta.R:98:3): Different backends get consistent results for SFO-SFO3+, dimethenamid data Reason: Fitting this ODE model with saemix takes about 15 minutes on my system ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── -✔ | 14 | Error model fitting [5.1s] +✔ | 14 | Error model fitting [4.9s] ✔ | 5 | Time step normalisation ✔ | 4 | Calculation of FOCUS chi2 error levels [0.6s] ✔ | 14 | Results for FOCUS D established in expertise for UBA (Ranke 2014) [0.8s] ✔ | 4 | Test fitting the decline of metabolites from their maximum [0.4s] ✔ | 1 | Fitting the logistic model [0.2s] -✔ | 7 | Batch fitting and diagnosing hierarchical kinetic models [14.6s] +✔ | 7 | Batch fitting and diagnosing hierarchical kinetic models [14.5s] ✔ | 1 12 | Nonlinear mixed-effects models [0.3s] ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── Skip (test_mixed.R:68:3): saemix results are reproducible for biphasic fits @@ -28,20 +28,20 @@ Reason: Fitting with saemix takes around 10 minutes when using deSolve ✔ | 8 | mkinmod model generation and printing [0.2s] ✔ | 3 | Model predictions with mkinpredict [0.3s] ✔ | 16 | Evaluations according to 2015 NAFTA guidance [1.8s] -✔ | 9 | Nonlinear mixed-effects models with nlme [8.5s] +✔ | 9 | Nonlinear mixed-effects models with nlme [8.3s] ✔ | 16 | Plotting [10.0s] ✔ | 4 | Residuals extracted from mkinfit models -✔ | 28 | saemix parent models [183.3s] +✔ | 28 | saemix parent models [180.2s] ✔ | 2 | Complex test case from Schaefer et al. (2007) Piacenza paper [1.4s] -✔ | 7 | Fitting the SFORB model [3.7s] +✔ | 7 | Fitting the SFORB model [3.6s] ✔ | 1 | Summaries of old mkinfit objects ✔ | 5 | Summary [0.2s] ✔ | 4 | Results for synthetic data established in expertise for UBA (Ranke 2014) [2.1s] -✔ | 9 | Hypothesis tests [8.1s] +✔ | 9 | Hypothesis tests [7.8s] ✔ | 4 | Calculation of maximum time weighted average concentrations (TWAs) [2.2s] ══ Results ═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════ -Duration: 282.2 s +Duration: 277.4 s ── Skipped tests ────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── • Fitting this ODE model with saemix takes about 15 minutes on my system (1) |