aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/test.log
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorJohannes Ranke <jranke@uni-bremen.de>2019-06-04 15:09:28 +0200
committerJohannes Ranke <jranke@uni-bremen.de>2019-06-04 15:09:28 +0200
commit95178837d3f91e84837628446b5fd468179af2b9 (patch)
tree8b162d5a22b28b59ca9c6bb27bf8f9dfbeaefbae /test.log
parent9a96391589fef9f80f9c6c4881cc48a509cb75f2 (diff)
Additional algorithm "d_c", more tests, docs
The new algorithm tries direct optimization of the likelihood, as well as a three step procedure. In this way, we consistently get the model with the highest likelihood for SFO, DFOP and HS for all 12 new test datasets.
Diffstat (limited to 'test.log')
-rw-r--r--test.log386
1 files changed, 377 insertions, 9 deletions
diff --git a/test.log b/test.log
index 0fcca094..30196966 100644
--- a/test.log
+++ b/test.log
@@ -2,28 +2,396 @@ Loading mkin
Testing mkin
✔ | OK F W S | Context
⠏ | 0 | Export dataset for reading into CAKE ✔ | 1 | Export dataset for reading into CAKE
- ⠏ | 0 | Error model fitting ⠋ | 1 | Error model fitting ⠹ | 3 | Error model fitting ⠸ | 4 | Error model fitting ⠼ | 5 | Error model fitting ⠴ | 6 | Error model fitting ⠧ | 8 | Error model fitting ⠏ | 10 | Error model fitting ⠋ | 11 | Error model fitting ✔ | 12 | Error model fitting [214.1 s]
- ⠏ | 0 | Calculation of FOCUS chi2 error levels ⠋ | 1 | Calculation of FOCUS chi2 error levels ⠹ | 3 | Calculation of FOCUS chi2 error levels ✔ | 3 | Calculation of FOCUS chi2 error levels [2.3 s]
+ ⠏ | 0 | Error model fitting ⠋ | 1 | Error model fitting ⠹ | 3 | Error model fitting ⠸ | 4 | Error model fitting ⠼ | 5 | Error model fitting ⠴ | 6 | Error model fitting ⠧ | 8 | Error model fitting ⠏ | 10 | Error model fitting ⠋ | 10 1 | Error model fitting ⠋ | 10 1 | Error model fitting ⠋ | 10 1 | Error model fitting ⠋ | 10 1 | Error model fitting ⠋ | 10 1 | Error model fitting ⠋ | 10 1 | Error model fitting ⠋ | 11 | Error model fittingSum of squared residuals at call 1: 1590.602
+Sum of squared residuals at call 3: 1590.601
+Sum of squared residuals at call 5: 999.7593
+Sum of squared residuals at call 7: 999.7513
+Sum of squared residuals at call 8: 979.5713
+Sum of squared residuals at call 9: 948.3366
+Sum of squared residuals at call 10: 855.9518
+Sum of squared residuals at call 13: 836.4547
+Sum of squared residuals at call 14: 836.4547
+Sum of squared residuals at call 16: 836.422
+Sum of squared residuals at call 19: 836.422
+Sum of squared residuals at call 23: 836.422
+Sum of squared residuals at call 24: 836.422
+Negative log-likelihood at call 30: 65.71278
+ ⠹ | 13 | Error model fittingNegative log-likelihood at call 1: 4104.4
+Negative log-likelihood at call 2: 4104.4
+Negative log-likelihood at call 4: 4104.399
+Negative log-likelihood at call 6: 85.79717
+Negative log-likelihood at call 11: 72.50327
+Negative log-likelihood at call 12: 72.50327
+Negative log-likelihood at call 17: 71.79809
+Negative log-likelihood at call 22: 71.10373
+Negative log-likelihood at call 26: 71.10373
+Negative log-likelihood at call 27: 70.84093
+Negative log-likelihood at call 29: 70.84093
+Negative log-likelihood at call 32: 70.64538
+Negative log-likelihood at call 37: 70.64538
+Negative log-likelihood at call 38: 70.33707
+Negative log-likelihood at call 40: 70.33707
+Negative log-likelihood at call 42: 70.33707
+Negative log-likelihood at call 43: 69.89484
+Negative log-likelihood at call 48: 69.05915
+Negative log-likelihood at call 53: 67.99547
+Negative log-likelihood at call 56: 67.99547
+Negative log-likelihood at call 58: 66.59808
+Negative log-likelihood at call 63: 66.59808
+Negative log-likelihood at call 64: 66.2343
+Negative log-likelihood at call 65: 66.23429
+Negative log-likelihood at call 68: 66.23428
+Negative log-likelihood at call 69: 65.67228
+Negative log-likelihood at call 70: 65.67228
+Negative log-likelihood at call 73: 65.67227
+Negative log-likelihood at call 74: 65.33106
+Negative log-likelihood at call 79: 65.31005
+Negative log-likelihood at call 80: 65.31005
+Negative log-likelihood at call 81: 65.31005
+Negative log-likelihood at call 83: 65.31004
+Negative log-likelihood at call 84: 65.17731
+Negative log-likelihood at call 85: 65.17731
+Negative log-likelihood at call 89: 65.16821
+Negative log-likelihood at call 94: 65.13357
+Negative log-likelihood at call 96: 65.13357
+Negative log-likelihood at call 98: 65.13357
+Negative log-likelihood at call 99: 65.08107
+Negative log-likelihood at call 104: 64.86685
+Negative log-likelihood at call 105: 64.86685
+Negative log-likelihood at call 109: 64.50332
+Negative log-likelihood at call 112: 64.50332
+Negative log-likelihood at call 114: 64.10889
+Negative log-likelihood at call 119: 63.57448
+Negative log-likelihood at call 120: 63.57448
+Negative log-likelihood at call 123: 63.57448
+Negative log-likelihood at call 124: 63.5456
+Negative log-likelihood at call 127: 63.5456
+Negative log-likelihood at call 129: 63.48903
+Negative log-likelihood at call 131: 63.48903
+Negative log-likelihood at call 135: 63.47608
+Negative log-likelihood at call 140: 63.47181
+Negative log-likelihood at call 141: 63.47181
+Negative log-likelihood at call 145: 63.4714
+Negative log-likelihood at call 146: 63.4714
+Negative log-likelihood at call 151: 63.4714
+Negative log-likelihood at call 152: 63.4714
+Negative log-likelihood at call 160: 63.4714
+Negative log-likelihood at call 169: 63.4714
+ ⠸ | 14 | Error model fittingSum of squared residuals at call 1: 1590.602
+Sum of squared residuals at call 3: 1590.601
+Sum of squared residuals at call 5: 999.7593
+Sum of squared residuals at call 7: 999.7513
+Sum of squared residuals at call 8: 979.5713
+Sum of squared residuals at call 9: 948.3366
+Sum of squared residuals at call 10: 855.9518
+Sum of squared residuals at call 13: 836.4547
+Sum of squared residuals at call 14: 836.4547
+Sum of squared residuals at call 16: 836.422
+Sum of squared residuals at call 19: 836.422
+Sum of squared residuals at call 23: 836.422
+Sum of squared residuals at call 24: 836.422
+Negative log-likelihood at call 32: 7208.014
+Negative log-likelihood at call 34: 7208.013
+Negative log-likelihood at call 36: 132.2815
+Negative log-likelihood at call 41: 75.57291
+Negative log-likelihood at call 42: 75.57291
+Negative log-likelihood at call 45: 75.57291
+Negative log-likelihood at call 47: 73.57761
+Negative log-likelihood at call 52: 70.3766
+Negative log-likelihood at call 57: 68.75449
+Negative log-likelihood at call 62: 68.50149
+Negative log-likelihood at call 64: 68.50149
+Negative log-likelihood at call 66: 68.50146
+Negative log-likelihood at call 67: 68.2035
+Negative log-likelihood at call 71: 68.2035
+Negative log-likelihood at call 72: 68.13162
+Negative log-likelihood at call 77: 67.94078
+Negative log-likelihood at call 78: 67.60889
+Negative log-likelihood at call 80: 67.60889
+Negative log-likelihood at call 83: 66.72645
+Negative log-likelihood at call 88: 65.66209
+Negative log-likelihood at call 93: 64.79703
+Negative log-likelihood at call 98: 64.6745
+Negative log-likelihood at call 101: 64.6745
+Negative log-likelihood at call 102: 64.6745
+Negative log-likelihood at call 103: 64.60902
+Negative log-likelihood at call 108: 64.56616
+Negative log-likelihood at call 113: 64.55458
+Negative log-likelihood at call 117: 64.55458
+Negative log-likelihood at call 119: 64.50796
+Negative log-likelihood at call 121: 64.50796
+Negative log-likelihood at call 124: 64.41361
+Negative log-likelihood at call 129: 64.2052
+Negative log-likelihood at call 134: 63.92264
+Negative log-likelihood at call 139: 63.66033
+Negative log-likelihood at call 140: 63.66033
+Negative log-likelihood at call 142: 63.66033
+Negative log-likelihood at call 144: 63.55606
+Negative log-likelihood at call 146: 63.55606
+Negative log-likelihood at call 149: 63.48537
+Negative log-likelihood at call 150: 63.48537
+Negative log-likelihood at call 154: 63.47183
+Negative log-likelihood at call 156: 63.47183
+Negative log-likelihood at call 157: 63.47183
+Negative log-likelihood at call 159: 63.47141
+Negative log-likelihood at call 160: 63.47141
+Negative log-likelihood at call 162: 63.47141
+Negative log-likelihood at call 164: 63.4714
+Negative log-likelihood at call 165: 63.4714
+Negative log-likelihood at call 168: 63.4714
+Negative log-likelihood at call 172: 63.4714
+Negative log-likelihood at call 173: 63.4714
+Negative log-likelihood at call 181: 63.4714
+Negative log-likelihood at call 182: 63.4714
+Negative log-likelihood at call 191: 63.4714
+ ⠼ | 15 | Error model fittingSum of squared residuals at call 1: 1590.602
+Sum of squared residuals at call 3: 1590.601
+Sum of squared residuals at call 5: 999.7593
+Sum of squared residuals at call 7: 999.7513
+Sum of squared residuals at call 8: 979.5713
+Sum of squared residuals at call 9: 948.3366
+Sum of squared residuals at call 10: 855.9518
+Sum of squared residuals at call 13: 836.4547
+Sum of squared residuals at call 14: 836.4547
+Sum of squared residuals at call 16: 836.422
+Sum of squared residuals at call 19: 836.422
+Sum of squared residuals at call 23: 836.422
+Sum of squared residuals at call 24: 836.422
+Negative log-likelihood at call 32: 7208.013
+Negative log-likelihood at call 34: 164.0572
+Negative log-likelihood at call 37: 139.4622
+Negative log-likelihood at call 40: 138.9749
+Negative log-likelihood at call 43: 134.4266
+Negative log-likelihood at call 46: 108.9584
+Negative log-likelihood at call 49: 98.97929
+Negative log-likelihood at call 52: 91.49458
+Negative log-likelihood at call 55: 87.49741
+Negative log-likelihood at call 57: 87.49741
+Negative log-likelihood at call 58: 85.29177
+Negative log-likelihood at call 61: 84.23711
+Negative log-likelihood at call 64: 83.76617
+Negative log-likelihood at call 67: 83.53472
+Negative log-likelihood at call 70: 83.33848
+Negative log-likelihood at call 73: 83.00488
+Negative log-likelihood at call 76: 82.06707
+Negative log-likelihood at call 77: 82.06707
+Negative log-likelihood at call 79: 75.48058
+Negative log-likelihood at call 82: 69.27829
+Negative log-likelihood at call 85: 66.14308
+Negative log-likelihood at call 86: 66.14306
+Negative log-likelihood at call 90: 65.73421
+Negative log-likelihood at call 91: 65.73421
+Negative log-likelihood at call 94: 65.71278
+Negative log-likelihood at call 98: 65.71278
+Negative log-likelihood at call 99: 65.71278
+Negative log-likelihood at call 127: 65.71278
+ ⠴ | 16 | Error model fittingSum of squared residuals at call 1: 1590.602
+Sum of squared residuals at call 3: 1590.601
+Sum of squared residuals at call 5: 999.7593
+Sum of squared residuals at call 7: 999.7513
+Sum of squared residuals at call 8: 979.5713
+Sum of squared residuals at call 9: 948.3366
+Sum of squared residuals at call 10: 855.9518
+Sum of squared residuals at call 13: 836.4547
+Sum of squared residuals at call 14: 836.4547
+Sum of squared residuals at call 16: 836.422
+Sum of squared residuals at call 19: 836.422
+Sum of squared residuals at call 23: 836.422
+Sum of squared residuals at call 24: 836.422
+Negative log-likelihood at call 32: 7208.013
+Negative log-likelihood at call 34: 164.0572
+Negative log-likelihood at call 37: 139.4622
+Negative log-likelihood at call 40: 138.9749
+Negative log-likelihood at call 43: 134.4266
+Negative log-likelihood at call 46: 108.9584
+Negative log-likelihood at call 49: 98.97929
+Negative log-likelihood at call 52: 91.49458
+Negative log-likelihood at call 55: 87.49741
+Negative log-likelihood at call 57: 87.49741
+Negative log-likelihood at call 58: 85.29177
+Negative log-likelihood at call 61: 84.23711
+Negative log-likelihood at call 64: 83.76617
+Negative log-likelihood at call 67: 83.53472
+Negative log-likelihood at call 70: 83.33848
+Negative log-likelihood at call 73: 83.00488
+Negative log-likelihood at call 76: 82.06707
+Negative log-likelihood at call 77: 82.06707
+Negative log-likelihood at call 79: 75.48058
+Negative log-likelihood at call 82: 69.27829
+Negative log-likelihood at call 85: 66.14308
+Negative log-likelihood at call 86: 66.14306
+Negative log-likelihood at call 90: 65.73421
+Negative log-likelihood at call 91: 65.73421
+Negative log-likelihood at call 94: 65.71278
+Negative log-likelihood at call 98: 65.71278
+Negative log-likelihood at call 99: 65.71278
+Negative log-likelihood at call 132: 65.71278
+ ⠦ | 17 | Error model fittingSum of squared residuals at call 1: 1590.602
+Sum of squared residuals at call 3: 1590.601
+Sum of squared residuals at call 5: 999.7593
+Sum of squared residuals at call 7: 999.7513
+Sum of squared residuals at call 8: 979.5713
+Sum of squared residuals at call 9: 948.3366
+Sum of squared residuals at call 10: 855.9518
+Sum of squared residuals at call 13: 836.4547
+Sum of squared residuals at call 14: 836.4547
+Sum of squared residuals at call 16: 836.422
+Sum of squared residuals at call 19: 836.422
+Sum of squared residuals at call 23: 836.422
+Sum of squared residuals at call 24: 836.422
+Negative log-likelihood at call 32: 7208.013
+Negative log-likelihood at call 34: 164.0572
+Negative log-likelihood at call 37: 139.4622
+Negative log-likelihood at call 40: 138.9749
+Negative log-likelihood at call 43: 134.4266
+Negative log-likelihood at call 46: 108.9584
+Negative log-likelihood at call 49: 98.97929
+Negative log-likelihood at call 52: 91.49458
+Negative log-likelihood at call 55: 87.49741
+Negative log-likelihood at call 57: 87.49741
+Negative log-likelihood at call 58: 85.29177
+Negative log-likelihood at call 61: 84.23711
+Negative log-likelihood at call 64: 83.76617
+Negative log-likelihood at call 67: 83.53472
+Negative log-likelihood at call 70: 83.33848
+Negative log-likelihood at call 73: 83.00488
+Negative log-likelihood at call 76: 82.06707
+Negative log-likelihood at call 77: 82.06707
+Negative log-likelihood at call 79: 75.48058
+Negative log-likelihood at call 82: 69.27829
+Negative log-likelihood at call 85: 66.14308
+Negative log-likelihood at call 86: 66.14306
+Negative log-likelihood at call 90: 65.73421
+Negative log-likelihood at call 91: 65.73421
+Negative log-likelihood at call 94: 65.71278
+Negative log-likelihood at call 98: 65.71278
+Negative log-likelihood at call 99: 65.71278
+Negative log-likelihood at call 118: 65.71278
+Negative log-likelihood at call 134: 65.71278
+ ⠧ | 18 | Error model fittingNegative log-likelihood at call 1: 4104.4
+Negative log-likelihood at call 2: 4104.4
+Negative log-likelihood at call 4: 4104.399
+Negative log-likelihood at call 6: 85.79717
+Negative log-likelihood at call 11: 72.50327
+Negative log-likelihood at call 12: 72.50327
+Negative log-likelihood at call 17: 71.79809
+Negative log-likelihood at call 22: 71.10373
+Negative log-likelihood at call 26: 71.10373
+Negative log-likelihood at call 27: 70.84093
+Negative log-likelihood at call 29: 70.84093
+Negative log-likelihood at call 32: 70.64538
+Negative log-likelihood at call 37: 70.64538
+Negative log-likelihood at call 38: 70.33707
+Negative log-likelihood at call 40: 70.33707
+Negative log-likelihood at call 42: 70.33707
+Negative log-likelihood at call 43: 69.89484
+Negative log-likelihood at call 48: 69.05915
+Negative log-likelihood at call 53: 67.99547
+Negative log-likelihood at call 56: 67.99547
+Negative log-likelihood at call 58: 66.59808
+Negative log-likelihood at call 63: 66.59808
+Negative log-likelihood at call 64: 66.2343
+Negative log-likelihood at call 65: 66.23429
+Negative log-likelihood at call 68: 66.23428
+Negative log-likelihood at call 69: 65.67228
+Negative log-likelihood at call 70: 65.67228
+Negative log-likelihood at call 73: 65.67227
+Negative log-likelihood at call 74: 65.33106
+Negative log-likelihood at call 79: 65.31005
+Negative log-likelihood at call 80: 65.31005
+Negative log-likelihood at call 81: 65.31005
+Negative log-likelihood at call 83: 65.31004
+Negative log-likelihood at call 84: 65.17731
+Negative log-likelihood at call 85: 65.17731
+Negative log-likelihood at call 89: 65.16821
+Negative log-likelihood at call 94: 65.13357
+Negative log-likelihood at call 96: 65.13357
+Negative log-likelihood at call 98: 65.13357
+Negative log-likelihood at call 99: 65.08107
+Negative log-likelihood at call 104: 64.86685
+Negative log-likelihood at call 105: 64.86685
+Negative log-likelihood at call 109: 64.50332
+Negative log-likelihood at call 112: 64.50332
+Negative log-likelihood at call 114: 64.10889
+Negative log-likelihood at call 119: 63.57448
+Negative log-likelihood at call 120: 63.57448
+Negative log-likelihood at call 123: 63.57448
+Negative log-likelihood at call 124: 63.5456
+Negative log-likelihood at call 127: 63.5456
+Negative log-likelihood at call 129: 63.48903
+Negative log-likelihood at call 131: 63.48903
+Negative log-likelihood at call 135: 63.47608
+Negative log-likelihood at call 140: 63.47181
+Negative log-likelihood at call 141: 63.47181
+Negative log-likelihood at call 145: 63.4714
+Negative log-likelihood at call 146: 63.4714
+Negative log-likelihood at call 151: 63.4714
+Negative log-likelihood at call 152: 63.4714
+Negative log-likelihood at call 160: 63.4714
+Negative log-likelihood at call 169: 63.4714
+Sum of squared residuals at call 179: 1590.602
+Sum of squared residuals at call 181: 1590.601
+Sum of squared residuals at call 183: 999.7593
+Sum of squared residuals at call 185: 999.7513
+Sum of squared residuals at call 186: 979.5713
+Sum of squared residuals at call 187: 948.3366
+Sum of squared residuals at call 188: 855.9518
+Sum of squared residuals at call 191: 836.4547
+Sum of squared residuals at call 192: 836.4547
+Sum of squared residuals at call 194: 836.422
+Sum of squared residuals at call 197: 836.422
+Sum of squared residuals at call 201: 836.422
+Sum of squared residuals at call 202: 836.422
+Negative log-likelihood at call 210: 7208.013
+Negative log-likelihood at call 212: 164.0572
+Negative log-likelihood at call 215: 139.4622
+Negative log-likelihood at call 218: 138.9749
+Negative log-likelihood at call 221: 134.4266
+Negative log-likelihood at call 224: 108.9584
+Negative log-likelihood at call 227: 98.97929
+Negative log-likelihood at call 230: 91.49458
+Negative log-likelihood at call 233: 87.49741
+Negative log-likelihood at call 235: 87.49741
+Negative log-likelihood at call 236: 85.29177
+Negative log-likelihood at call 239: 84.23711
+Negative log-likelihood at call 242: 83.76617
+Negative log-likelihood at call 245: 83.53472
+Negative log-likelihood at call 248: 83.33848
+Negative log-likelihood at call 251: 83.00488
+Negative log-likelihood at call 254: 82.06707
+Negative log-likelihood at call 255: 82.06707
+Negative log-likelihood at call 257: 75.48058
+Negative log-likelihood at call 260: 69.27829
+Negative log-likelihood at call 263: 66.14308
+Negative log-likelihood at call 264: 66.14306
+Negative log-likelihood at call 268: 65.73421
+Negative log-likelihood at call 269: 65.73421
+Negative log-likelihood at call 272: 65.71278
+Negative log-likelihood at call 276: 65.71278
+Negative log-likelihood at call 277: 65.71278
+Negative log-likelihood at call 305: 65.71278
+ ⠇ | 19 | Error model fitting ⠏ | 20 | Error model fitting ✔ | 20 | Error model fitting [506.4 s]
+ ⠏ | 0 | Calculation of FOCUS chi2 error levels ⠋ | 1 | Calculation of FOCUS chi2 error levels ⠹ | 3 | Calculation of FOCUS chi2 error levels ⠼ | 5 | Calculation of FOCUS chi2 error levels ✔ | 5 | Calculation of FOCUS chi2 error levels [3.6 s]
⠏ | 0 | Results for FOCUS D established in expertise for UBA (Ranke 2014) ⠋ | 1 | Results for FOCUS D established in expertise for UBA (Ranke 2014) ⠙ | 2 | Results for FOCUS D established in expertise for UBA (Ranke 2014) ⠸ | 4 | Results for FOCUS D established in expertise for UBA (Ranke 2014) ⠇ | 9 | Results for FOCUS D established in expertise for UBA (Ranke 2014) ✔ | 13 | Results for FOCUS D established in expertise for UBA (Ranke 2014) [3.8 s]
⠏ | 0 | Test fitting the decline of metabolites from their maximum ⠋ | 1 | Test fitting the decline of metabolites from their maximum ⠹ | 3 | Test fitting the decline of metabolites from their maximum ⠼ | 5 | Test fitting the decline of metabolites from their maximum ✔ | 6 | Test fitting the decline of metabolites from their maximum [0.9 s]
⠏ | 0 | Fitting the logistic model ⠋ | 1 | Fitting the logistic model ✔ | 1 | Fitting the logistic model [0.9 s]
⠏ | 0 | Test dataset class mkinds used in gmkin ✔ | 1 | Test dataset class mkinds used in gmkin
- ⠏ | 0 | Special cases of mkinfit calls ⠋ | 1 | Special cases of mkinfit calls ⠇ | 9 | Special cases of mkinfit calls ⠏ | 10 | Special cases of mkinfit calls ⠋ | 11 | Special cases of mkinfit calls ⠙ | 12 | Special cases of mkinfit calls ✔ | 12 | Special cases of mkinfit calls [2.9 s]
+ ⠏ | 0 | Special cases of mkinfit calls ⠋ | 1 | Special cases of mkinfit calls ⠇ | 9 | Special cases of mkinfit calls ⠏ | 10 | Special cases of mkinfit calls ⠋ | 11 | Special cases of mkinfit calls ⠙ | 12 | Special cases of mkinfit calls ✔ | 12 | Special cases of mkinfit calls [2.7 s]
⠏ | 0 | mkinmod model generation and printing ⠇ | 9 | mkinmod model generation and printing ✔ | 9 | mkinmod model generation and printing [0.2 s]
⠏ | 0 | Model predictions with mkinpredict ⠋ | 1 | Model predictions with mkinpredict ✔ | 3 | Model predictions with mkinpredict [0.3 s]
⠏ | 0 | Evaluations according to 2015 NAFTA guidance ⠙ | 2 | Evaluations according to 2015 NAFTA guidance ⠇ | 9 | Evaluations according to 2015 NAFTA guidance ⠏ | 10 | Evaluations according to 2015 NAFTA guidance ⠴ | 16 | Evaluations according to 2015 NAFTA guidance ✔ | 16 | Evaluations according to 2015 NAFTA guidance [4.1 s]
- ⠏ | 0 | Fitting of parent only models ⠋ | 1 | Fitting of parent only models ⠙ | 2 | Fitting of parent only models ⠹ | 3 | Fitting of parent only models ⠸ | 4 | Fitting of parent only models ⠼ | 5 | Fitting of parent only models ⠴ | 6 | Fitting of parent only models ⠦ | 7 | Fitting of parent only models ⠧ | 8 | Fitting of parent only models ⠇ | 9 | Fitting of parent only models ⠏ | 10 | Fitting of parent only models ⠋ | 11 | Fitting of parent only models ⠙ | 12 | Fitting of parent only models ⠹ | 13 | Fitting of parent only models ⠴ | 16 | Fitting of parent only models ⠧ | 18 | Fitting of parent only models ⠏ | 20 | Fitting of parent only models ✔ | 21 | Fitting of parent only models [40.1 s]
- ⠏ | 0 | Calculation of maximum time weighted average concentrations (TWAs) ⠋ | 1 | Calculation of maximum time weighted average concentrations (TWAs) ⠙ | 2 | Calculation of maximum time weighted average concentrations (TWAs) ⠹ | 3 | Calculation of maximum time weighted average concentrations (TWAs) ⠸ | 4 | Calculation of maximum time weighted average concentrations (TWAs) ✔ | 4 | Calculation of maximum time weighted average concentrations (TWAs) [2.3 s]
+ ⠏ | 0 | Fitting of parent only models ⠋ | 1 | Fitting of parent only models ⠙ | 2 | Fitting of parent only models ⠹ | 3 | Fitting of parent only models ⠸ | 4 | Fitting of parent only models ⠼ | 5 | Fitting of parent only models ⠴ | 6 | Fitting of parent only models ⠦ | 7 | Fitting of parent only models ⠧ | 8 | Fitting of parent only models ⠇ | 9 | Fitting of parent only models ⠏ | 10 | Fitting of parent only models ⠋ | 11 | Fitting of parent only models ⠙ | 12 | Fitting of parent only models ⠹ | 13 | Fitting of parent only models ⠴ | 16 | Fitting of parent only models ⠧ | 18 | Fitting of parent only models ⠏ | 20 | Fitting of parent only models ✔ | 21 | Fitting of parent only models [40.9 s]
+ ⠏ | 0 | Calculation of maximum time weighted average concentrations (TWAs) ⠋ | 1 | Calculation of maximum time weighted average concentrations (TWAs) ⠙ | 2 | Calculation of maximum time weighted average concentrations (TWAs) ⠹ | 3 | Calculation of maximum time weighted average concentrations (TWAs) ⠸ | 4 | Calculation of maximum time weighted average concentrations (TWAs) ✔ | 4 | Calculation of maximum time weighted average concentrations (TWAs) [2.2 s]
⠏ | 0 | Summary ✔ | 1 | Summary
⠏ | 0 | Plotting ⠹ | 3 | Plotting ✔ | 4 | Plotting [0.3 s]
⠏ | 0 | AIC calculation ✔ | 2 | AIC calculation
- ⠏ | 0 | Complex test case from Schaefer et al. (2007) Piacenza paper ⠋ | 1 | Complex test case from Schaefer et al. (2007) Piacenza paper ✔ | 2 | Complex test case from Schaefer et al. (2007) Piacenza paper [5.2 s]
- ⠏ | 0 | Results for synthetic data established in expertise for UBA (Ranke 2014) ⠋ | 1 | Results for synthetic data established in expertise for UBA (Ranke 2014) ⠹ | 3 | Results for synthetic data established in expertise for UBA (Ranke 2014) ✔ | 4 | Results for synthetic data established in expertise for UBA (Ranke 2014) [7.0 s]
+ ⠏ | 0 | Complex test case from Schaefer et al. (2007) Piacenza paper ⠋ | 1 | Complex test case from Schaefer et al. (2007) Piacenza paper ✔ | 2 | Complex test case from Schaefer et al. (2007) Piacenza paper [5.4 s]
+ ⠏ | 0 | Results for synthetic data established in expertise for UBA (Ranke 2014) ⠋ | 1 | Results for synthetic data established in expertise for UBA (Ranke 2014) ⠹ | 3 | Results for synthetic data established in expertise for UBA (Ranke 2014) ✔ | 4 | Results for synthetic data established in expertise for UBA (Ranke 2014) [7.2 s]
══ Results ═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
-Duration: 289.7 s
+Duration: 584.3 s
-OK: 115
+OK: 125
Failed: 0
Warnings: 0
Skipped: 0

Contact - Imprint