Add plotting tests, add nafta to pkgdown

1 files changed, 11 insertions, 9 deletions

diff --git a/test.log b/test.log
index 5a71534f..345746e2 100644
--- a/test.log
+++ b/test.log
@@ -1,28 +1,30 @@
 Loading mkin
 Testing mkin
 ✔ | OK F W S | Context
-
⠏ |  0       | Calculation of FOCUS chi2 error levels
⠋ |  1       | Calculation of FOCUS chi2 error levels
⠙ |  2       | Calculation of FOCUS chi2 error levels
✔ |  2       | Calculation of FOCUS chi2 error levels [2.5 s]
-
⠏ |  0       | Results for FOCUS D established in expertise for UBA (Ranke 2014)
⠋ |  1       | Results for FOCUS D established in expertise for UBA (Ranke 2014)
⠙ |  2       | Results for FOCUS D established in expertise for UBA (Ranke 2014)
⠹ |  3       | Results for FOCUS D established in expertise for UBA (Ranke 2014)
⠸ |  4       | Results for FOCUS D established in expertise for UBA (Ranke 2014)
⠼ |  5       | Results for FOCUS D established in expertise for UBA (Ranke 2014)
⠴ |  6       | Results for FOCUS D established in expertise for UBA (Ranke 2014)
⠦ |  7       | Results for FOCUS D established in expertise for UBA (Ranke 2014)
⠧ |  8       | Results for FOCUS D established in expertise for UBA (Ranke 2014)
✔ |  8       | Results for FOCUS D established in expertise for UBA (Ranke 2014) [7.2 s]
-
⠏ |  0       | Iteratively reweighted least squares (IRLS) fitting
⠋ |  1       | Iteratively reweighted least squares (IRLS) fitting
⠙ |  1     1 | Iteratively reweighted least squares (IRLS) fitting
✔ |  1     1 | Iteratively reweighted least squares (IRLS) fitting [9.0 s]
+
⠏ |  0       | Calculation of FOCUS chi2 error levels
⠋ |  1       | Calculation of FOCUS chi2 error levels
⠙ |  2       | Calculation of FOCUS chi2 error levels
✔ |  2       | Calculation of FOCUS chi2 error levels [2.4 s]
+
⠏ |  0       | Results for FOCUS D established in expertise for UBA (Ranke 2014)
⠋ |  1       | Results for FOCUS D established in expertise for UBA (Ranke 2014)
⠙ |  2       | Results for FOCUS D established in expertise for UBA (Ranke 2014)
⠹ |  3       | Results for FOCUS D established in expertise for UBA (Ranke 2014)
⠸ |  4       | Results for FOCUS D established in expertise for UBA (Ranke 2014)
⠼ |  5       | Results for FOCUS D established in expertise for UBA (Ranke 2014)
⠴ |  6       | Results for FOCUS D established in expertise for UBA (Ranke 2014)
⠦ |  7       | Results for FOCUS D established in expertise for UBA (Ranke 2014)
⠧ |  8       | Results for FOCUS D established in expertise for UBA (Ranke 2014)
✔ |  8       | Results for FOCUS D established in expertise for UBA (Ranke 2014) [7.1 s]
+
⠏ |  0       | Iteratively reweighted least squares (IRLS) fitting
⠋ |  1       | Iteratively reweighted least squares (IRLS) fitting
⠙ |  1     1 | Iteratively reweighted least squares (IRLS) fitting
✔ |  1     1 | Iteratively reweighted least squares (IRLS) fitting [8.8 s]
 ────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
 test_irls.R:44: skip: Reweighting method 'tc' works
 Too much trouble with datasets that are randomly generated
 ────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
 
⠏ |  0       | Fitting the logistic model
⠋ |  1       | Fitting the logistic model
⠙ |  1     1 | Fitting the logistic model
✔ |  1     1 | Fitting the logistic model [0.5 s]
 ────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
-test_logistic.R:42: skip: The logistic fit can be done via differential equation
+test_logistic.R:41: skip: The logistic fit can be done via differential equation
 Skip slow fit of logistic model using deSolve without compilation
 ────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
 
⠏ |  0       | Model predictions with mkinpredict
⠋ |  1       | Model predictions with mkinpredict
⠙ |  2       | Model predictions with mkinpredict
⠹ |  3       | Model predictions with mkinpredict
✔ |  3       | Model predictions with mkinpredict [0.3 s]
-
⠏ |  0       | Fitting of parent only models
⠋ |  1       | Fitting of parent only models
⠙ |  2       | Fitting of parent only models
⠹ |  3       | Fitting of parent only models
⠸ |  4       | Fitting of parent only models
⠼ |  5       | Fitting of parent only models
⠴ |  6       | Fitting of parent only models
⠦ |  7       | Fitting of parent only models
⠧ |  8       | Fitting of parent only models
⠇ |  9       | Fitting of parent only models
⠏ | 10       | Fitting of parent only models
⠋ | 11       | Fitting of parent only models
⠙ | 12       | Fitting of parent only models
⠹ | 13       | Fitting of parent only models
⠸ | 14       | Fitting of parent only models
⠼ | 15       | Fitting of parent only models
⠴ | 16       | Fitting of parent only models
⠦ | 17       | Fitting of parent only models
⠧ | 18       | Fitting of parent only models
⠇ | 19       | Fitting of parent only models
⠏ | 20       | Fitting of parent only models
⠋ | 21       | Fitting of parent only models
✔ | 21       | Fitting of parent only models [23.9 s]
-
⠏ |  0       | Complex test case from Schaefer et al. (2007) Piacenza paper
⠋ |  1       | Complex test case from Schaefer et al. (2007) Piacenza paper
⠙ |  2       | Complex test case from Schaefer et al. (2007) Piacenza paper
✔ |  2       | Complex test case from Schaefer et al. (2007) Piacenza paper [6.0 s]
+
⠏ |  0       | Evaluations according to the NAFTA guidance from 2015
⠋ |  1       | Evaluations according to the NAFTA guidance from 2015
⠙ |  1   1   | Evaluations according to the NAFTA guidance from 2015
⠙ |  2       | Evaluations according to the NAFTA guidance from 2015
⠹ |  3       | Evaluations according to the NAFTA guidance from 2015
⠸ |  4       | Evaluations according to the NAFTA guidance from 2015
⠼ |  5       | Evaluations according to the NAFTA guidance from 2015
⠴ |  6       | Evaluations according to the NAFTA guidance from 2015
⠦ |  7       | Evaluations according to the NAFTA guidance from 2015
✔ |  7       | Evaluations according to the NAFTA guidance from 2015 [0.7 s]
+
⠏ |  0       | Fitting of parent only models
⠋ |  1       | Fitting of parent only models
⠙ |  2       | Fitting of parent only models
⠹ |  3       | Fitting of parent only models
⠸ |  4       | Fitting of parent only models
⠼ |  5       | Fitting of parent only models
⠴ |  6       | Fitting of parent only models
⠦ |  7       | Fitting of parent only models
⠧ |  8       | Fitting of parent only models
⠇ |  9       | Fitting of parent only models
⠏ | 10       | Fitting of parent only models
⠋ | 11       | Fitting of parent only models
⠙ | 12       | Fitting of parent only models
⠹ | 13       | Fitting of parent only models
⠸ | 14       | Fitting of parent only models
⠼ | 15       | Fitting of parent only models
⠴ | 16       | Fitting of parent only models
⠦ | 17       | Fitting of parent only models
⠧ | 18       | Fitting of parent only models
⠇ | 19       | Fitting of parent only models
⠏ | 20       | Fitting of parent only models
⠋ | 21       | Fitting of parent only models
✔ | 21       | Fitting of parent only models [23.8 s]
+
⠏ |  0       | Calculation of maximum time weighted average concentrations (TWAs)
⠋ |  1       | Calculation of maximum time weighted average concentrations (TWAs)
⠙ |  2       | Calculation of maximum time weighted average concentrations (TWAs)
⠹ |  3       | Calculation of maximum time weighted average concentrations (TWAs)
⠸ |  4       | Calculation of maximum time weighted average concentrations (TWAs)
⠼ |  5       | Calculation of maximum time weighted average concentrations (TWAs)
⠴ |  6       | Calculation of maximum time weighted average concentrations (TWAs)
⠦ |  7       | Calculation of maximum time weighted average concentrations (TWAs)
⠧ |  8       | Calculation of maximum time weighted average concentrations (TWAs)
✔ |  8       | Calculation of maximum time weighted average concentrations (TWAs) [7.2 s]
+
⠏ |  0       | Plotting
⠋ |  1       | Plotting
⠙ |  2       | Plotting
✔ |  2       | Plotting [0.4 s]
+
⠏ |  0       | Complex test case from Schaefer et al. (2007) Piacenza paper
⠋ |  1       | Complex test case from Schaefer et al. (2007) Piacenza paper
⠙ |  2       | Complex test case from Schaefer et al. (2007) Piacenza paper
✔ |  2       | Complex test case from Schaefer et al. (2007) Piacenza paper [5.9 s]
 
⠏ |  0       | Results for synthetic data established in expertise for UBA (Ranke 2014)
⠋ |  1       | Results for synthetic data established in expertise for UBA (Ranke 2014)
⠙ |  2       | Results for synthetic data established in expertise for UBA (Ranke 2014)
⠹ |  3       | Results for synthetic data established in expertise for UBA (Ranke 2014)
⠸ |  4       | Results for synthetic data established in expertise for UBA (Ranke 2014)
✔ |  4       | Results for synthetic data established in expertise for UBA (Ranke 2014) [7.5 s]
-
⠏ |  0       | Calculation of maximum time weighted average concentrations (TWAs)
⠋ |  1       | Calculation of maximum time weighted average concentrations (TWAs)
⠙ |  2       | Calculation of maximum time weighted average concentrations (TWAs)
⠹ |  3       | Calculation of maximum time weighted average concentrations (TWAs)
⠸ |  4       | Calculation of maximum time weighted average concentrations (TWAs)
⠼ |  5       | Calculation of maximum time weighted average concentrations (TWAs)
⠴ |  6       | Calculation of maximum time weighted average concentrations (TWAs)
⠦ |  7       | Calculation of maximum time weighted average concentrations (TWAs)
⠧ |  8       | Calculation of maximum time weighted average concentrations (TWAs)
✔ |  8       | Calculation of maximum time weighted average concentrations (TWAs) [8.4 s]
 
 ══ Results ═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
-Duration: 65.5 s
+Duration: 65.9 s
 
-OK:       50
+OK:       59
 Failed:   0
 Warnings: 0
 Skipped:  2