diff options
| author | Johannes Ranke <jranke@uni-bremen.de> | 2017-07-21 16:16:01 +0200 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Johannes Ranke <jranke@uni-bremen.de> | 2017-07-21 16:16:27 +0200 |
| commit | 1623d0f0df92e2d4f44faa7a64a0b795e275b444 (patch) | |
| tree | 831cfafcb836e8abd559e7209519ba40bf160077 /test.log | |
| parent | 4cf446d2539602b6187a365da183b56618410f46 (diff) | |
Fix tests, try FOMC ill-defined again
Diffstat (limited to 'test.log')
| -rw-r--r-- | test.log | 214 |
1 files changed, 209 insertions, 5 deletions
@@ -9,14 +9,218 @@ Testing mkin Calculation of FOCUS chi2 error levels: .. Results for FOCUS D established in expertise for UBA (Ranke 2014): ...... The t-test for significant difference from zero: .. -Fitting the FOMC model with large parameter correlation: S +Fitting the FOMC model with large parameter correlation: Model cost at call 1 : 2154.97 +Model cost at call 2 : 2154.97 +Model cost at call 4 : 2154.97 +Model cost at call 5 : 388.1874 +Model cost at call 9 : 198.5808 +Model cost at call 10 : 198.5806 +Model cost at call 13 : 167.315 +Model cost at call 15 : 167.315 +Model cost at call 17 : 122.5165 +Model cost at call 21 : 110.3697 +Model cost at call 25 : 99.37279 +Model cost at call 26 : 99.37279 +Model cost at call 29 : 85.86611 +Model cost at call 30 : 85.86609 +Model cost at call 33 : 83.79827 +Model cost at call 35 : 83.79825 +Model cost at call 37 : 77.76253 +Model cost at call 39 : 77.76252 +Model cost at call 40 : 77.76252 +Model cost at call 41 : 74.85232 +Model cost at call 45 : 71.0713 +Model cost at call 49 : 69.0689 +Model cost at call 53 : 65.69063 +Model cost at call 54 : 65.69063 +Model cost at call 57 : 63.81175 +Model cost at call 58 : 63.81174 +Model cost at call 61 : 61.77925 +Model cost at call 65 : 60.68903 +Model cost at call 69 : 58.787 +Model cost at call 73 : 57.79498 +Model cost at call 77 : 56.72184 +Model cost at call 78 : 56.72184 +Model cost at call 81 : 56.27078 +Model cost at call 82 : 56.27077 +Model cost at call 85 : 55.76643 +Model cost at call 89 : 55.06746 +Model cost at call 93 : 54.77276 +Model cost at call 97 : 54.46435 +Model cost at call 101 : 53.97206 +Model cost at call 105 : 53.7466 +Model cost at call 109 : 53.45331 +Model cost at call 113 : 53.15008 +Model cost at call 117 : 52.8698 +Model cost at call 122 : 52.79044 +Model cost at call 126 : 52.64587 +Model cost at call 127 : 52.56412 +Model cost at call 131 : 52.37304 +Model cost at call 135 : 52.29005 +Model cost at call 139 : 52.20652 +Model cost at call 143 : 52.05187 +Model cost at call 147 : 51.95367 +Model cost at call 151 : 51.80296 +Model cost at call 152 : 51.80296 +Model cost at call 153 : 51.80296 +Model cost at call 155 : 51.79287 +Model cost at call 156 : 51.79286 +Model cost at call 157 : 51.79286 +Model cost at call 159 : 51.71749 +Model cost at call 163 : 51.69885 +Model cost at call 164 : 51.66416 +Model cost at call 169 : 51.61289 +Model cost at call 173 : 51.5739 +Model cost at call 177 : 51.5122 +Model cost at call 181 : 51.44598 +Model cost at call 185 : 51.42107 +Model cost at call 189 : 51.37519 +Model cost at call 193 : 51.32105 +Model cost at call 194 : 51.32105 +Model cost at call 195 : 51.32105 +Model cost at call 197 : 51.29233 +Model cost at call 199 : 51.29233 +Model cost at call 200 : 51.29233 +Model cost at call 202 : 51.27541 +Model cost at call 206 : 51.24732 +Model cost at call 210 : 51.20348 +Model cost at call 214 : 51.1884 +Model cost at call 218 : 51.15654 +Model cost at call 222 : 51.12473 +Model cost at call 226 : 51.1093 +Model cost at call 230 : 51.09604 +Model cost at call 234 : 51.07288 +Model cost at call 238 : 51.04678 +Model cost at call 243 : 51.03801 +Model cost at call 247 : 51.02297 +Model cost at call 248 : 51.01588 +Model cost at call 252 : 50.99353 +Model cost at call 253 : 50.99353 +Model cost at call 254 : 50.99353 +Model cost at call 256 : 50.98775 +Model cost at call 257 : 50.97537 +Model cost at call 258 : 50.97537 +Model cost at call 259 : 50.97537 +Model cost at call 260 : 50.97537 +Model cost at call 262 : 50.97142 +Model cost at call 266 : 50.96632 +Model cost at call 272 : 50.9654 +Model cost at call 276 : 50.96385 +Model cost at call 279 : 50.96385 +Model cost at call 284 : 50.96354 +Model cost at call 286 : 50.96354 +Model cost at call 290 : 50.96292 +Model cost at call 293 : 50.96292 +Model cost at call 298 : 50.9628 +Model cost at call 300 : 50.9628 +Model cost at call 305 : 50.96277 +Model cost at call 307 : 50.96277 +Model cost at call 312 : 50.96277 +Model cost at call 314 : 50.96277 +Model cost at call 318 : 50.96276 +Model cost at call 321 : 50.96276 +Model cost at call 326 : 50.96276 +Model cost at call 328 : 50.96276 +Model cost at call 332 : 50.96275 +Model cost at call 333 : 50.96274 +Model cost at call 336 : 50.96274 +Model cost at call 337 : 50.96274 +Model cost at call 342 : 50.96274 +Model cost at call 344 : 50.96274 +Model cost at call 348 : 50.96274 +Model cost at call 351 : 50.96274 +Model cost at call 357 : 50.96274 +Model cost at call 359 : 50.96274 +Model cost at call 363 : 50.96274 +Model cost at call 364 : 50.96274 +Model cost at call 367 : 50.96274 +Model cost at call 375 : 50.96274 +Model cost at call 381 : 50.96274 +Model cost at call 388 : 50.96274 +Model cost at call 452 : 50.96274 +.Model cost at call 1 : 2154.97 +Model cost at call 3 : 2154.97 +Model cost at call 5 : 2154.97 +Model cost at call 6 : 716.4083 +Model cost at call 8 : 716.4082 +Model cost at call 11 : 136.1354 +Model cost at call 12 : 136.1354 +Model cost at call 15 : 64.35183 +Model cost at call 16 : 64.35183 +Model cost at call 20 : 61.48715 +Model cost at call 22 : 61.48715 +Model cost at call 24 : 59.59792 +Model cost at call 26 : 59.59792 +Model cost at call 28 : 57.47603 +Model cost at call 30 : 57.47603 +Model cost at call 32 : 57.10469 +Model cost at call 34 : 57.10468 +Model cost at call 36 : 54.78942 +Model cost at call 38 : 54.78942 +Model cost at call 40 : 54.29399 +Model cost at call 42 : 54.29399 +Model cost at call 44 : 53.55295 +Model cost at call 46 : 53.55294 +Model cost at call 49 : 53.10239 +Model cost at call 51 : 53.10239 +Model cost at call 53 : 52.95095 +Model cost at call 55 : 52.95095 +Model cost at call 57 : 52.41198 +Model cost at call 59 : 52.41198 +Model cost at call 61 : 52.24816 +Model cost at call 63 : 52.24816 +Model cost at call 65 : 51.99669 +Model cost at call 67 : 51.99669 +Model cost at call 69 : 51.82092 +Model cost at call 71 : 51.82092 +Model cost at call 74 : 51.69389 +Model cost at call 76 : 51.69389 +Model cost at call 78 : 51.64468 +Model cost at call 80 : 51.64468 +Model cost at call 82 : 51.46367 +Model cost at call 84 : 51.46366 +Model cost at call 86 : 51.407 +Model cost at call 88 : 51.407 +Model cost at call 90 : 51.30871 +Model cost at call 92 : 51.30871 +Model cost at call 94 : 51.23556 +Model cost at call 96 : 51.23556 +Model cost at call 98 : 51.17829 +Model cost at call 100 : 51.17829 +Model cost at call 103 : 51.13498 +Model cost at call 105 : 51.13498 +Model cost at call 107 : 51.11419 +Model cost at call 109 : 51.11419 +Model cost at call 111 : 51.05405 +Model cost at call 113 : 51.05405 +Model cost at call 115 : 51.0096 +Model cost at call 117 : 51.0096 +Model cost at call 119 : 50.97496 +Model cost at call 121 : 50.97496 +Model cost at call 125 : 50.96419 +Model cost at call 126 : 50.96419 +Model cost at call 129 : 50.96365 +Model cost at call 131 : 50.96365 +Model cost at call 134 : 50.96354 +Model cost at call 136 : 50.96354 +Model cost at call 138 : 50.96333 +Model cost at call 140 : 50.96333 +Model cost at call 142 : 50.9629 +Model cost at call 144 : 50.9629 +Model cost at call 147 : 50.96282 +Model cost at call 149 : 50.96282 +Model cost at call 152 : 50.9628 +Model cost at call 156 : 50.96277 +Model cost at call 161 : 50.96276 +Model cost at call 165 : 50.96275 +Model cost at call 170 : 50.96274 +Model cost at call 175 : 50.96274 +Optimisation by method Marq successfully terminated. +. Model predictions with mkinpredict: ... -Fitting of parent only models: ..................... +Fitting of parent only models: ...................... Complex test case from Schaefer et al. (2007) Piacenza paper: .. Results for synthetic data established in expertise for UBA (Ranke 2014): .... Calculation of maximum time weighted average concentrations (TWAs): ... -Skipped ------------------------------------------------------------------------ -1. Fitting with large parameter correlation gives warnings (@test_FOMC_ill-defined.R#30) - Skip test for warnings triggered by large parameter correlation as it failed on r-forge - DONE =========================================================================== |