Reintroduce interface to saemix

Also after the upgrade from buster to bullseye of my local system, some
test results for saemix have changed.

1 files changed, 11 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/tests/testthat/test_plot.R b/tests/testthat/test_plot.R
index 0bf3ee66..1c95d069 100644
--- a/tests/testthat/test_plot.R
+++ b/tests/testthat/test_plot.R
@@ -35,6 +35,11 @@ test_that("Plotting mkinfit, mmkin and mixed model objects is reproducible", {
   plot_biphasic_mmkin <- function() plot(f_uba_dfop_sfo_mixed)
   vdiffr::expect_doppelganger("mixed model fit for mmkin object", plot_biphasic_mmkin)
 
+  if (saemix_available) {
+    plot_biphasic_saem_s <- function() plot(f_uba_dfop_sfo_saem)
+    vdiffr::expect_doppelganger("mixed model fit for saem object with saemix transformations", plot_biphasic_saem_s)
+  }
+
   skip_on_travis()
 
   plot_biphasic_nlme <- function() plot(dfop_nlme_1)
@@ -43,6 +48,12 @@ test_that("Plotting mkinfit, mmkin and mixed model objects is reproducible", {
   #plot_biphasic_mmkin <- function() plot(mixed(mmkin_biphasic))
   # Biphasic fits with lots of data and fits have lots of potential for differences
   plot_biphasic_nlme <- function() plot(nlme_biphasic)
+  if (saemix_available) {
+    #plot_biphasic_saem_s <- function() plot(saem_biphasic_s)
+    plot_biphasic_saem_m <- function() plot(saem_biphasic_m)
+
+    vdiffr::expect_doppelganger("mixed model fit for saem object with mkin transformations", plot_biphasic_saem_m)
+  }
 
   # different results when working with eigenvalues
   plot_errmod_fit_D_obs_eigen <- function() plot_err(fit_D_obs_eigen, sep_obs = FALSE)