diff options
-rw-r--r-- | R/confint.mkinfit.R | 5 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | docs/reference/confint.mkinfit.html | 9 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | man/confint.mkinfit.Rd | 5 |
3 files changed, 8 insertions, 11 deletions
diff --git a/R/confint.mkinfit.R b/R/confint.mkinfit.R index 07614306..84183808 100644 --- a/R/confint.mkinfit.R +++ b/R/confint.mkinfit.R @@ -27,9 +27,8 @@ #' @param backtransform If we approximate the likelihood in terms of the #' transformed parameters, should we backtransform the parameters with #' their confidence intervals? -#' @param cores The number of cores to be used for multicore processing. This -#' is only used when the \code{cluster} argument is \code{NULL}. On Windows -#' machines, cores > 1 is not supported. +#' @param cores The number of cores to be used for multicore processing. +#' On Windows machines, cores > 1 is currently not supported. #' @param quiet Should we suppress the message "Profiling the likelihood" #' @return A matrix with columns giving lower and upper confidence limits for #' each parameter. diff --git a/docs/reference/confint.mkinfit.html b/docs/reference/confint.mkinfit.html index 6015fbf6..13662adf 100644 --- a/docs/reference/confint.mkinfit.html +++ b/docs/reference/confint.mkinfit.html @@ -203,9 +203,8 @@ their confidence intervals?</p></td> </tr> <tr> <th>cores</th> - <td><p>The number of cores to be used for multicore processing. This -is only used when the <code>cluster</code> argument is <code>NULL</code>. On Windows -machines, cores > 1 is not supported.</p></td> + <td><p>The number of cores to be used for multicore processing. +On Windows machines, cores > 1 is currently not supported.</p></td> </tr> <tr> <th>quiet</th> @@ -255,13 +254,13 @@ machines, cores > 1 is not supported.</p></td> <span class='kw'>use_of_ff</span> <span class='kw'>=</span> <span class='st'>"max"</span>, <span class='kw'>quiet</span> <span class='kw'>=</span> <span class='fl'>TRUE</span>) <span class='no'>f_d_1</span> <span class='kw'><-</span> <span class='fu'><a href='mkinfit.html'>mkinfit</a></span>(<span class='no'>SFO_SFO</span>, <span class='fu'><a href='https://rdrr.io/r/base/subset.html'>subset</a></span>(<span class='no'>FOCUS_2006_D</span>, <span class='no'>value</span> <span class='kw'>!=</span> <span class='fl'>0</span>), <span class='kw'>quiet</span> <span class='kw'>=</span> <span class='fl'>TRUE</span>) <span class='fu'><a href='https://rdrr.io/r/base/system.time.html'>system.time</a></span>(<span class='no'>ci_profile</span> <span class='kw'><-</span> <span class='fu'><a href='https://rdrr.io/r/stats/confint.html'>confint</a></span>(<span class='no'>f_d_1</span>, <span class='kw'>method</span> <span class='kw'>=</span> <span class='st'>"profile"</span>, <span class='kw'>cores</span> <span class='kw'>=</span> <span class='fl'>1</span>, <span class='kw'>quiet</span> <span class='kw'>=</span> <span class='fl'>TRUE</span>))</div><div class='output co'>#> User System verstrichen -#> 51.297 0.000 51.328 </div><div class='input'><span class='co'># Using more cores does not save much time here, as parent_0 takes up most of the time</span> +#> 51.341 0.000 51.370 </div><div class='input'><span class='co'># Using more cores does not save much time here, as parent_0 takes up most of the time</span> <span class='co'># If we additionally exclude parent_0 (the confidence of which is often of</span> <span class='co'># minor interest), we get a nice performance improvement from about 50</span> <span class='co'># seconds to about 12 seconds if we use at least four cores</span> <span class='fu'><a href='https://rdrr.io/r/base/system.time.html'>system.time</a></span>(<span class='no'>ci_profile_no_parent_0</span> <span class='kw'><-</span> <span class='fu'><a href='https://rdrr.io/r/stats/confint.html'>confint</a></span>(<span class='no'>f_d_1</span>, <span class='kw'>method</span> <span class='kw'>=</span> <span class='st'>"profile"</span>, <span class='fu'><a href='https://rdrr.io/r/base/c.html'>c</a></span>(<span class='st'>"k_parent_sink"</span>, <span class='st'>"k_parent_m1"</span>, <span class='st'>"k_m1_sink"</span>, <span class='st'>"sigma"</span>), <span class='kw'>cores</span> <span class='kw'>=</span> <span class='no'>n_cores</span>))</div><div class='output co'>#> <span class='message'>Profiling the likelihood</span></div><div class='output co'>#> User System verstrichen -#> 0.006 0.003 11.435 </div><div class='input'><span class='no'>ci_profile</span></div><div class='output co'>#> 2.5% 97.5% +#> 0.001 0.007 11.432 </div><div class='input'><span class='no'>ci_profile</span></div><div class='output co'>#> 2.5% 97.5% #> parent_0 96.456003650 1.027703e+02 #> k_parent_sink 0.040762501 5.549764e-02 #> k_parent_m1 0.046786482 5.500879e-02 diff --git a/man/confint.mkinfit.Rd b/man/confint.mkinfit.Rd index e4a60556..60e82517 100644 --- a/man/confint.mkinfit.Rd +++ b/man/confint.mkinfit.Rd @@ -36,9 +36,8 @@ applied to the likelihood based on the transformed parameters?} transformed parameters, should we backtransform the parameters with their confidence intervals?} -\item{cores}{The number of cores to be used for multicore processing. This -is only used when the \code{cluster} argument is \code{NULL}. On Windows -machines, cores > 1 is not supported.} +\item{cores}{The number of cores to be used for multicore processing. +On Windows machines, cores > 1 is currently not supported.} \item{quiet}{Should we suppress the message "Profiling the likelihood"} |