diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'docs/index.html')
| -rw-r--r-- | docs/index.html | 25 |
1 files changed, 8 insertions, 17 deletions
diff --git a/docs/index.html b/docs/index.html index 4491b50f..0204d944 100644 --- a/docs/index.html +++ b/docs/index.html @@ -151,7 +151,7 @@ <li>The usual one-sided t-test for significant difference from zero is nevertheless shown based on estimators for the untransformed parameters.</li> <li>Summary and plotting functions. The <code>summary</code> of an <code>mkinfit</code> object is in fact a full report that should give enough information to be able to approximately reproduce the fit with other tools.</li> <li>The chi-squared error level as defined in the FOCUS kinetics guidance (see below) is calculated for each observed variable.</li> -<li>The ‘variance by variable’ error model which is often fitted using Iteratively Reweighted Least Squares (IRLS) should now be specified as <code>error_model = "obs"</code>.</li> +<li>The ‘variance by variable’ error model which is often fitted using Iteratively Reweighted Least Squares (IRLS) can be specified as <code>error_model = "obs"</code>.</li> </ul> </div> <div class="section level3"> @@ -214,21 +214,12 @@ <h2 id="references">References<a class="anchor" aria-label="anchor" href="#references"></a> </h2> <table class="table"> -<tr> -<td> -Ranke J, Wöltjen J, Schmidt J, and Comets E (2021) Taking kinetic evaluations of degradation data to the next level with nonlinear mixed-effects models. <i>Environments</i> <b>8</b> (8) 71 <a href="https://doi.org/10.3390/environments8080071" class="external-link">doi:10.3390/environments8080071</a> -</td> -</tr> -<tr> -<td> -Ranke J, Meinecke S (2019) Error Models for the Kinetic Evaluation of Chemical Degradation Data <i>Environments</i> <b>6</b> (12) 124 <a href="https://doi.org/10.3390/environments6120124" class="external-link">doi:10.3390/environments6120124</a> -</td> -</tr> -<tr> -<td> -Ranke J, Wöltjen J, Meinecke S (2018) Comparison of software tools for kinetic evaluation of chemical degradation data <i>Environmental Sciences Europe</i> <b>30</b> 17 <a href="https://doi.org/10.1186/s12302-018-0145-1" class="external-link">doi:10.1186/s12302-018-0145-1</a> -</td> -</tr> +<tr><td>Ranke J, Wöltjen J, Schmidt J, and Comets E (2021) Taking kinetic evaluations of degradation data to the next level with nonlinear mixed-effects models. <i>Environments</i> <b>8</b> (8) 71 <a href="https://doi.org/10.3390/environments8080071" class="external-link">doi:10.3390/environments8080071</a> +</td></tr> +<tr><td>Ranke J, Meinecke S (2019) Error Models for the Kinetic Evaluation of Chemical Degradation Data <i>Environments</i> <b>6</b> (12) 124 <a href="https://doi.org/10.3390/environments6120124" class="external-link">doi:10.3390/environments6120124</a> +</td></tr> +<tr><td>Ranke J, Wöltjen J, Meinecke S (2018) Comparison of software tools for kinetic evaluation of chemical degradation data <i>Environmental Sciences Europe</i> <b>30</b> 17 <a href="https://doi.org/10.1186/s12302-018-0145-1" class="external-link">doi:10.1186/s12302-018-0145-1</a> +</td></tr> </table> </div> <div class="section level2"> @@ -292,7 +283,7 @@ Ranke J, Wöltjen J, Meinecke S (2018) Comparison of software tools for kinetic <div class="pkgdown"> <p></p> -<p>Site built with <a href="https://pkgdown.r-lib.org/" class="external-link">pkgdown</a> 2.0.2.</p> +<p>Site built with <a href="https://pkgdown.r-lib.org/" class="external-link">pkgdown</a> 2.0.3.</p> </div> </footer> |