diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'log/test.log')
| -rw-r--r-- | log/test.log | 58 |
1 files changed, 29 insertions, 29 deletions
diff --git a/log/test.log b/log/test.log index 10c0aa76..dc1b6c74 100644 --- a/log/test.log +++ b/log/test.log @@ -1,57 +1,57 @@ ℹ Testing mkin ✔ | F W S OK | Context ✔ | 5 | AIC calculation -✔ | 5 | Analytical solutions for coupled models [2.9s] +✔ | 5 | Analytical solutions for coupled models [1.6s] ✔ | 5 | Calculation of Akaike weights ✔ | 3 | Export dataset for reading into CAKE -✔ | 12 | Confidence intervals and p-values [1.0s] -✔ | 1 12 | Dimethenamid data from 2018 [29.5s] +✔ | 12 | Confidence intervals and p-values [0.4s] +✔ | 1 12 | Dimethenamid data from 2018 [12.4s] ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── -Skip ('test_dmta.R:99'): Different backends get consistent results for SFO-SFO3+, dimethenamid data +Skip ('test_dmta.R:98'): Different backends get consistent results for SFO-SFO3+, dimethenamid data Reason: Fitting this ODE model with saemix takes about 15 minutes on my system ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── -✔ | 14 | Error model fitting [4.9s] +✔ | 14 | Error model fitting [2.3s] ✔ | 5 | Time step normalisation -✔ | 4 | Calculation of FOCUS chi2 error levels [0.6s] -✔ | 14 | Results for FOCUS D established in expertise for UBA (Ranke 2014) [0.7s] -✔ | 4 | Test fitting the decline of metabolites from their maximum [0.3s] -✔ | 1 | Fitting the logistic model [0.2s] -✔ | 10 | Batch fitting and diagnosing hierarchical kinetic models [24.7s] -✔ | 1 12 | Nonlinear mixed-effects models [0.3s] +✔ | 4 | Calculation of FOCUS chi2 error levels [0.3s] +✔ | 14 | Results for FOCUS D established in expertise for UBA (Ranke 2014) [0.4s] +✔ | 4 | Test fitting the decline of metabolites from their maximum [0.2s] +✔ | 1 | Fitting the logistic model [0.1s] +✔ | 10 | Batch fitting and diagnosing hierarchical kinetic models [19.1s] +✔ | 1 11 | Nonlinear mixed-effects models [5.9s] ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── -Skip ('test_mixed.R:74'): saemix results are reproducible for biphasic fits +Skip ('test_mixed.R:78'): saemix results are reproducible for biphasic fits Reason: Fitting with saemix takes around 10 minutes when using deSolve ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── ✔ | 3 | Test dataset classes mkinds and mkindsg -✔ | 10 | Special cases of mkinfit calls [0.5s] -✔ | 3 | mkinfit features [0.7s] -✔ | 8 | mkinmod model generation and printing [0.2s] -✔ | 3 | Model predictions with mkinpredict [0.4s] -✔ | 7 | Multistart method for saem.mmkin models [36.8s] -✔ | 16 | Evaluations according to 2015 NAFTA guidance [2.5s] -✔ | 9 | Nonlinear mixed-effects models with nlme [8.8s] -✔ | 16 | Plotting [10.0s] +✔ | 10 | Special cases of mkinfit calls [0.4s] +✔ | 3 | mkinfit features [0.5s] +✔ | 8 | mkinmod model generation and printing +✔ | 3 | Model predictions with mkinpredict [0.1s] +✔ | 12 | Multistart method for saem.mmkin models [21.6s] +✔ | 16 | Evaluations according to 2015 NAFTA guidance [1.5s] +✔ | 9 | Nonlinear mixed-effects models with nlme [3.7s] +✔ | 15 | Plotting [4.6s] ✔ | 4 | Residuals extracted from mkinfit models -✔ | 1 36 | saemix parent models [66.1s] +✔ | 1 36 | saemix parent models [30.9s] ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── Skip ('test_saemix_parent.R:143'): We can also use mkin solution methods for saem Reason: This still takes almost 2.5 minutes although we do not solve ODEs ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── -✔ | 2 | Complex test case from Schaefer et al. (2007) Piacenza paper [1.1s] +✔ | 2 | Complex test case from Schaefer et al. (2007) Piacenza paper [0.6s] ✔ | 11 | Processing of residue series -✔ | 10 | Fitting the SFORB model [3.4s] +✔ | 10 | Fitting the SFORB model [1.7s] ✔ | 1 | Summaries of old mkinfit objects -✔ | 5 | Summary [0.2s] -✔ | 4 | Results for synthetic data established in expertise for UBA (Ranke 2014) [1.6s] -✔ | 9 | Hypothesis tests [6.1s] -✔ | 4 | Calculation of maximum time weighted average concentrations (TWAs) [2.2s] +✔ | 5 | Summary +✔ | 4 | Results for synthetic data established in expertise for UBA (Ranke 2014) [0.9s] +✔ | 9 | Hypothesis tests [3.3s] +✔ | 4 | Calculation of maximum time weighted average concentrations (TWAs) [0.7s] ══ Results ═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════ -Duration: 206.2 s +Duration: 113.6 s ── Skipped tests ────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── • Fitting this ODE model with saemix takes about 15 minutes on my system (1) • Fitting with saemix takes around 10 minutes when using deSolve (1) • This still takes almost 2.5 minutes although we do not solve ODEs (1) -[ FAIL 0 | WARN 0 | SKIP 3 | PASS 267 ] +[ FAIL 0 | WARN 0 | SKIP 3 | PASS 270 ] |