diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'log/test.log')
| -rw-r--r-- | log/test.log | 32 |
1 files changed, 16 insertions, 16 deletions
diff --git a/log/test.log b/log/test.log index 874d6e24..f20a7f18 100644 --- a/log/test.log +++ b/log/test.log @@ -1,45 +1,45 @@ ℹ Testing mkin ✔ | F W S OK | Context ✔ | 5 | AIC calculation -✔ | 5 | Analytical solutions for coupled models [3.3s] +✔ | 5 | Analytical solutions for coupled models [3.2s] ✔ | 5 | Calculation of Akaike weights ✔ | 3 | Export dataset for reading into CAKE ✔ | 12 | Confidence intervals and p-values [1.0s] -✔ | 1 12 | Dimethenamid data from 2018 [31.5s] +✔ | 1 12 | Dimethenamid data from 2018 [32.1s] ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── -Skip (test_dmta.R:98:3): Different backends get consistent results for SFO-SFO3+, dimethenamid data +Skip ('test_dmta.R:98'): Different backends get consistent results for SFO-SFO3+, dimethenamid data Reason: Fitting this ODE model with saemix takes about 15 minutes on my system ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── -✔ | 14 | Error model fitting [5.0s] +✔ | 14 | Error model fitting [4.9s] ✔ | 5 | Time step normalisation ✔ | 4 | Calculation of FOCUS chi2 error levels [0.6s] ✔ | 14 | Results for FOCUS D established in expertise for UBA (Ranke 2014) [0.8s] -✔ | 4 | Test fitting the decline of metabolites from their maximum [0.4s] +✔ | 4 | Test fitting the decline of metabolites from their maximum [0.3s] ✔ | 1 | Fitting the logistic model [0.2s] ✔ | 10 | Batch fitting and diagnosing hierarchical kinetic models [24.0s] ✔ | 1 12 | Nonlinear mixed-effects models [0.3s] ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── -Skip (test_mixed.R:74:3): saemix results are reproducible for biphasic fits +Skip ('test_mixed.R:74'): saemix results are reproducible for biphasic fits Reason: Fitting with saemix takes around 10 minutes when using deSolve ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── ✔ | 3 | Test dataset classes mkinds and mkindsg ✔ | 10 | Special cases of mkinfit calls [0.5s] ✔ | 3 | mkinfit features [0.7s] ✔ | 8 | mkinmod model generation and printing [0.2s] -✔ | 3 | Model predictions with mkinpredict [0.3s] -✔ | 7 | Multistart method for saem.mmkin models [36.3s] -✔ | 16 | Evaluations according to 2015 NAFTA guidance [2.4s] -✔ | 9 | Nonlinear mixed-effects models with nlme [8.8s] -✔ | 16 | Plotting [10.1s] +✔ | 3 | Model predictions with mkinpredict [0.4s] +✔ | 7 | Multistart method for saem.mmkin models [36.7s] +✔ | 16 | Evaluations according to 2015 NAFTA guidance [2.3s] +✔ | 9 | Nonlinear mixed-effects models with nlme [8.5s] +✔ | 16 | Plotting [9.8s] ✔ | 4 | Residuals extracted from mkinfit models -✔ | 1 37 | saemix parent models [71.5s] +✔ | 1 36 | saemix parent models [66.4s] ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── -Skip (test_saemix_parent.R:153:3): We can also use mkin solution methods for saem +Skip ('test_saemix_parent.R:143'): We can also use mkin solution methods for saem Reason: This still takes almost 2.5 minutes although we do not solve ODEs ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── ✔ | 2 | Complex test case from Schaefer et al. (2007) Piacenza paper [1.4s] ✔ | 11 | Processing of residue series -✔ | 10 | Fitting the SFORB model [3.8s] +✔ | 10 | Fitting the SFORB model [3.7s] ✔ | 1 | Summaries of old mkinfit objects ✔ | 5 | Summary [0.2s] ✔ | 4 | Results for synthetic data established in expertise for UBA (Ranke 2014) [2.2s] @@ -47,11 +47,11 @@ Reason: This still takes almost 2.5 minutes although we do not solve ODEs ✔ | 4 | Calculation of maximum time weighted average concentrations (TWAs) [2.2s] ══ Results ═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════ -Duration: 216.0 s +Duration: 211.1 s ── Skipped tests ────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── • Fitting this ODE model with saemix takes about 15 minutes on my system (1) • Fitting with saemix takes around 10 minutes when using deSolve (1) • This still takes almost 2.5 minutes although we do not solve ODEs (1) -[ FAIL 0 | WARN 0 | SKIP 3 | PASS 268 ] +[ FAIL 0 | WARN 0 | SKIP 3 | PASS 267 ] |