diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'test.log')
| -rw-r--r-- | test.log | 39 |
1 files changed, 22 insertions, 17 deletions
@@ -2,40 +2,45 @@ Loading mkin Testing mkin ✔ | OK F W S | Context
⠏ | 0 | Export dataset for reading into CAKE
⠋ | 1 | Export dataset for reading into CAKE
✔ | 1 | Export dataset for reading into CAKE -
⠏ | 0 | Calculation of FOCUS chi2 error levels
⠋ | 1 | Calculation of FOCUS chi2 error levels
⠙ | 2 | Calculation of FOCUS chi2 error levels
✔ | 2 | Calculation of FOCUS chi2 error levels [2.4 s] -
⠏ | 0 | Results for FOCUS D established in expertise for UBA (Ranke 2014)
⠋ | 1 | Results for FOCUS D established in expertise for UBA (Ranke 2014)
⠙ | 2 | Results for FOCUS D established in expertise for UBA (Ranke 2014)
⠹ | 3 | Results for FOCUS D established in expertise for UBA (Ranke 2014)
⠸ | 4 | Results for FOCUS D established in expertise for UBA (Ranke 2014)
⠼ | 5 | Results for FOCUS D established in expertise for UBA (Ranke 2014)
⠴ | 6 | Results for FOCUS D established in expertise for UBA (Ranke 2014)
⠦ | 7 | Results for FOCUS D established in expertise for UBA (Ranke 2014)
⠧ | 8 | Results for FOCUS D established in expertise for UBA (Ranke 2014)
⠇ | 9 | Results for FOCUS D established in expertise for UBA (Ranke 2014)
⠏ | 10 | Results for FOCUS D established in expertise for UBA (Ranke 2014)
⠋ | 11 | Results for FOCUS D established in expertise for UBA (Ranke 2014)
⠙ | 12 | Results for FOCUS D established in expertise for UBA (Ranke 2014)
⠹ | 13 | Results for FOCUS D established in expertise for UBA (Ranke 2014)
✔ | 13 | Results for FOCUS D established in expertise for UBA (Ranke 2014) [8.0 s] -
⠏ | 0 | Test fitting the decline of metabolites from their maximum
⠋ | 1 | Test fitting the decline of metabolites from their maximum
⠙ | 2 | Test fitting the decline of metabolites from their maximum
⠹ | 3 | Test fitting the decline of metabolites from their maximum
✔ | 3 | Test fitting the decline of metabolites from their maximum [0.6 s] -
⠏ | 0 | Iteratively reweighted least squares (IRLS) fitting
⠋ | 1 | Iteratively reweighted least squares (IRLS) fitting
⠙ | 2 | Iteratively reweighted least squares (IRLS) fitting
⠹ | 2 1 | Iteratively reweighted least squares (IRLS) fitting
✔ | 2 1 | Iteratively reweighted least squares (IRLS) fitting [16.0 s] +
⠏ | 0 | Error model fitting
⠋ | 1 | Error model fitting
⠙ | 2 | Error model fitting
⠹ | 3 | Error model fitting
⠸ | 4 | Error model fitting
⠼ | 5 | Error model fitting
⠴ | 6 | Error model fitting
⠦ | 7 | Error model fitting
⠧ | 8 | Error model fitting
⠇ | 9 | Error model fitting
⠏ | 9 1 | Error model fitting
⠋ | 10 1 | Error model fitting
⠙ | 10 2 | Error model fitting
⠙ | 10 2 | Error model fitting
⠙ | 10 2 | Error model fitting
⠙ | 10 2 | Error model fitting
⠙ | 10 2 | Error model fitting
⠙ | 10 2 | Error model fitting
⠙ | 10 2 | Error model fitting
⠙ | 10 2 | Error model fitting
⠙ | 10 2 | Error model fitting
⠙ | 10 2 | Error model fitting
⠙ | 10 2 | Error model fitting
⠙ | 10 2 | Error model fitting
⠙ | 10 2 | Error model fitting
⠙ | 10 2 ⠙ | 10 | Error model fitting2 | Error model fitting
⠙ | 11 1 | Error model fitting
⠹ | 12 1 | Error model fitting
✔ | 12 1 | Error model fitting [163.7 s] ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── -test_irls.R:48: skip: Reweighting method 'tc' works -Too much trouble with datasets that are randomly generated +test_error_models.R:148: warning: Reweighting method 'tc' produces reasonable variance estimates +Observations with value of zero were removed from the data ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── -
⠏ | 0 | Fitting the logistic model
⠋ | 1 | Fitting the logistic model
⠙ | 1 1 | Fitting the logistic model
✔ | 1 1 | Fitting the logistic model [0.5 s] +
⠏ | 0 | Calculation of FOCUS chi2 error levels
⠋ | 1 | Calculation of FOCUS chi2 error levels
⠙ | 2 | Calculation of FOCUS chi2 error levels
⠹ | 3 | Calculation of FOCUS chi2 error levels
✔ | 3 | Calculation of FOCUS chi2 error levels [2.4 s] +
⠏ | 0 | Results for FOCUS D established in expertise for UBA (Ranke 2014)
⠋ | 1 | Results for FOCUS D established in expertise for UBA (Ranke 2014)
⠙ | 2 | Results for FOCUS D established in expertise for UBA (Ranke 2014)
⠹ | 3 | Results for FOCUS D established in expertise for UBA (Ranke 2014)
⠸ | 4 | Results for FOCUS D established in expertise for UBA (Ranke 2014)
⠼ | 5 | Results for FOCUS D established in expertise for UBA (Ranke 2014)
⠴ | 6 | Results for FOCUS D established in expertise for UBA (Ranke 2014)
⠦ | 7 | Results for FOCUS D established in expertise for UBA (Ranke 2014)
⠧ | 8 | Results for FOCUS D established in expertise for UBA (Ranke 2014)
⠇ | 9 | Results for FOCUS D established in expertise for UBA (Ranke 2014)
⠏ | 10 | Results for FOCUS D established in expertise for UBA (Ranke 2014)
⠋ | 11 | Results for FOCUS D established in expertise for UBA (Ranke 2014)
⠙ | 12 | Results for FOCUS D established in expertise for UBA (Ranke 2014)
⠹ | 13 | Results for FOCUS D established in expertise for UBA (Ranke 2014)
⠸ | 13 1 | Results for FOCUS D established in expertise for UBA (Ranke 2014)
✔ | 13 1 | Results for FOCUS D established in expertise for UBA (Ranke 2014) [8.3 s] +──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── +test_FOCUS_D_UBA_expertise.R:89: skip: The t-value for fits using internal transformations corresponds with results from FME, synthetic data +Hessian matrices and df calculations differ from those in FME +──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── +
⠏ | 0 | Test fitting the decline of metabolites from their maximum
⠋ | 1 | Test fitting the decline of metabolites from their maximum
⠙ | 2 | Test fitting the decline of metabolites from their maximum
⠹ | 3 | Test fitting the decline of metabolites from their maximum
⠸ | 4 | Test fitting the decline of metabolites from their maximum
⠼ | 5 | Test fitting the decline of metabolites from their maximum
⠴ | 6 | Test fitting the decline of metabolites from their maximum
✔ | 6 | Test fitting the decline of metabolites from their maximum [0.9 s] +
⠏ | 0 | Fitting the logistic model
⠋ | 1 | Fitting the logistic model
⠙ | 1 1 | Fitting the logistic model
✔ | 1 1 | Fitting the logistic model [0.9 s] ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── test_logistic.R:41: skip: The logistic fit can be done via differential equation Skip slow fit of logistic model using deSolve without compilation ────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
⠏ | 0 | Test dataset class mkinds used in gmkin
⠋ | 1 | Test dataset class mkinds used in gmkin
✔ | 1 | Test dataset class mkinds used in gmkin -
⠏ | 0 | Special cases of mkinfit calls
⠋ | 1 | Special cases of mkinfit calls
⠙ | 2 | Special cases of mkinfit calls
⠹ | 3 | Special cases of mkinfit calls
⠸ | 4 | Special cases of mkinfit calls
⠼ | 5 | Special cases of mkinfit calls
⠴ | 6 | Special cases of mkinfit calls
⠦ | 7 | Special cases of mkinfit calls
⠧ | 8 | Special cases of mkinfit calls
⠇ | 9 | Special cases of mkinfit calls
⠏ | 10 | Special cases of mkinfit calls
⠋ | 11 | Special cases of mkinfit calls
⠙ | 12 | Special cases of mkinfit calls
⠹ | 12 1 | Special cases of mkinfit calls
⠸ | 13 1 | Special cases of mkinfit calls
⠼ | 14 1 | Special cases of mkinfit calls
⠴ | 15 1 | Special cases of mkinfit calls
⠦ | 16 1 | Special cases of mkinfit calls
✔ | 16 1 | Special cases of mkinfit calls [2.9 s] +
⠏ | 0 | Special cases of mkinfit calls
⠋ | 1 | Special cases of mkinfit calls
⠙ | 2 | Special cases of mkinfit calls
⠹ | 3 | Special cases of mkinfit calls
⠸ | 4 | Special cases of mkinfit calls
⠼ | 5 | Special cases of mkinfit calls
⠴ | 6 | Special cases of mkinfit calls
⠦ | 7 | Special cases of mkinfit calls
⠧ | 8 | Special cases of mkinfit calls
⠇ | 8 1 | Special cases of mkinfit calls
⠏ | 9 1 | Special cases of mkinfit calls
⠋ | 10 1 | Special cases of mkinfit calls
⠙ | 11 1 | Special cases of mkinfit calls
⠹ | 12 1 | Special cases of mkinfit calls
✔ | 12 1 | Special cases of mkinfit calls [3.2 s] ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── -test_mkinfit_errors.R:67: skip: mkinfit warns if the user chooses the SANN method -The SANN algorithm takes very long with the default maximum number of iterations of 10000 +test_mkinfit_errors.R:59: warning: mkinfit stops early when a low maximum number of iterations is specified +Optimisation did not converge: +iteration limit reached without convergence (10) ────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
⠏ | 0 | mkinmod model generation and printing
⠋ | 1 | mkinmod model generation and printing
⠙ | 2 | mkinmod model generation and printing
⠹ | 3 | mkinmod model generation and printing
⠸ | 4 | mkinmod model generation and printing
⠼ | 5 | mkinmod model generation and printing
⠴ | 6 | mkinmod model generation and printing
⠦ | 7 | mkinmod model generation and printing
⠧ | 8 | mkinmod model generation and printing
⠇ | 9 | mkinmod model generation and printing
✔ | 9 | mkinmod model generation and printing [0.2 s]
⠏ | 0 | Model predictions with mkinpredict
⠋ | 1 | Model predictions with mkinpredict
⠙ | 2 | Model predictions with mkinpredict
⠹ | 3 | Model predictions with mkinpredict
✔ | 3 | Model predictions with mkinpredict [0.3 s] -
⠏ | 0 | Evaluations according to 2015 NAFTA guidance
⠋ | 1 | Evaluations according to 2015 NAFTA guidance
⠙ | 2 | Evaluations according to 2015 NAFTA guidance
⠹ | 3 | Evaluations according to 2015 NAFTA guidance
⠸ | 4 | Evaluations according to 2015 NAFTA guidance
⠼ | 5 | Evaluations according to 2015 NAFTA guidance
⠴ | 6 | Evaluations according to 2015 NAFTA guidance
⠦ | 7 | Evaluations according to 2015 NAFTA guidance
⠧ | 8 | Evaluations according to 2015 NAFTA guidance
⠇ | 9 | Evaluations according to 2015 NAFTA guidance
⠏ | 10 | Evaluations according to 2015 NAFTA guidance
⠋ | 11 | Evaluations according to 2015 NAFTA guidance
⠙ | 12 | Evaluations according to 2015 NAFTA guidance
⠹ | 13 | Evaluations according to 2015 NAFTA guidance
⠸ | 14 | Evaluations according to 2015 NAFTA guidance
⠼ | 15 | Evaluations according to 2015 NAFTA guidance
⠴ | 16 | Evaluations according to 2015 NAFTA guidance
⠦ | 17 | Evaluations according to 2015 NAFTA guidance
✔ | 17 | Evaluations according to 2015 NAFTA guidance [2.2 s] -
⠏ | 0 | Fitting of parent only models
⠋ | 1 | Fitting of parent only models
⠙ | 2 | Fitting of parent only models
⠹ | 3 | Fitting of parent only models
⠸ | 4 | Fitting of parent only models
⠼ | 5 | Fitting of parent only models
⠴ | 6 | Fitting of parent only models
⠦ | 7 | Fitting of parent only models
⠧ | 8 | Fitting of parent only models
⠇ | 9 | Fitting of parent only models
⠏ | 10 | Fitting of parent only models
⠋ | 11 | Fitting of parent only models
⠙ | 12 | Fitting of parent only models
⠹ | 13 | Fitting of parent only models
⠸ | 14 | Fitting of parent only models
⠼ | 15 | Fitting of parent only models
⠴ | 16 | Fitting of parent only models
⠦ | 17 | Fitting of parent only models
⠧ | 18 | Fitting of parent only models
⠇ | 19 | Fitting of parent only models
⠏ | 20 | Fitting of parent only models
⠋ | 21 | Fitting of parent only models
✔ | 21 | Fitting of parent only models [23.8 s] +
⠏ | 0 | Evaluations according to 2015 NAFTA guidance
⠋ | 1 | Evaluations according to 2015 NAFTA guidance
⠙ | 2 | Evaluations according to 2015 NAFTA guidance
⠹ | 3 | Evaluations according to 2015 NAFTA guidance
⠸ | 4 | Evaluations according to 2015 NAFTA guidance
⠼ | 5 | Evaluations according to 2015 NAFTA guidance
⠴ | 6 | Evaluations according to 2015 NAFTA guidance
⠦ | 7 | Evaluations according to 2015 NAFTA guidance
⠧ | 8 | Evaluations according to 2015 NAFTA guidance
⠇ | 9 | Evaluations according to 2015 NAFTA guidance
⠏ | 10 | Evaluations according to 2015 NAFTA guidance
⠋ | 11 | Evaluations according to 2015 NAFTA guidance
⠙ | 12 | Evaluations according to 2015 NAFTA guidance
⠹ | 13 | Evaluations according to 2015 NAFTA guidance
⠸ | 14 | Evaluations according to 2015 NAFTA guidance
⠼ | 15 | Evaluations according to 2015 NAFTA guidance
⠴ | 16 | Evaluations according to 2015 NAFTA guidance
✔ | 16 | Evaluations according to 2015 NAFTA guidance [4.1 s] +
⠏ | 0 | Fitting of parent only models
⠋ | 1 | Fitting of parent only models
⠙ | 2 | Fitting of parent only models
⠹ | 3 | Fitting of parent only models
⠸ | 4 | Fitting of parent only models
⠼ | 5 | Fitting of parent only models
⠴ | 6 | Fitting of parent only models
⠦ | 7 | Fitting of parent only models
⠧ | 8 | Fitting of parent only models
⠇ | 9 | Fitting of parent only models
⠏ | 10 | Fitting of parent only models
⠋ | 11 | Fitting of parent only models
⠙ | 12 | Fitting of parent only models
⠹ | 13 | Fitting of parent only models
⠸ | 14 | Fitting of parent only models
⠼ | 15 | Fitting of parent only models
⠴ | 16 | Fitting of parent only models
⠦ | 17 | Fitting of parent only models
⠧ | 18 | Fitting of parent only models
⠇ | 19 | Fitting of parent only models
⠏ | 20 | Fitting of parent only models
⠋ | 21 | Fitting of parent only models
✔ | 21 | Fitting of parent only models [58.6 s]
⠏ | 0 | Calculation of maximum time weighted average concentrations (TWAs)
⠋ | 1 | Calculation of maximum time weighted average concentrations (TWAs)
⠙ | 2 | Calculation of maximum time weighted average concentrations (TWAs)
⠹ | 3 | Calculation of maximum time weighted average concentrations (TWAs)
⠸ | 4 | Calculation of maximum time weighted average concentrations (TWAs)
✔ | 4 | Calculation of maximum time weighted average concentrations (TWAs) [3.7 s]
⠏ | 0 | Summary
⠋ | 1 | Summary
✔ | 1 | Summary
⠏ | 0 | Plotting
⠋ | 1 | Plotting
⠙ | 2 | Plotting
⠹ | 3 | Plotting
⠸ | 4 | Plotting
✔ | 4 | Plotting [0.3 s]
⠏ | 0 | AIC calculation
⠋ | 1 | AIC calculation
⠙ | 2 | AIC calculation
✔ | 2 | AIC calculation -
⠏ | 0 | Complex test case from Schaefer et al. (2007) Piacenza paper
⠋ | 1 | Complex test case from Schaefer et al. (2007) Piacenza paper
⠙ | 2 | Complex test case from Schaefer et al. (2007) Piacenza paper
✔ | 2 | Complex test case from Schaefer et al. (2007) Piacenza paper [5.9 s] +
⠏ | 0 | Complex test case from Schaefer et al. (2007) Piacenza paper
⠋ | 1 | Complex test case from Schaefer et al. (2007) Piacenza paper
⠙ | 2 | Complex test case from Schaefer et al. (2007) Piacenza paper
✔ | 2 | Complex test case from Schaefer et al. (2007) Piacenza paper [5.6 s]
⠏ | 0 | Results for synthetic data established in expertise for UBA (Ranke 2014)
⠋ | 1 | Results for synthetic data established in expertise for UBA (Ranke 2014)
⠙ | 2 | Results for synthetic data established in expertise for UBA (Ranke 2014)
⠹ | 3 | Results for synthetic data established in expertise for UBA (Ranke 2014)
⠸ | 4 | Results for synthetic data established in expertise for UBA (Ranke 2014)
✔ | 4 | Results for synthetic data established in expertise for UBA (Ranke 2014) [7.4 s] ══ Results ═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════ -Duration: 75.3 s +Duration: 265.8 s -OK: 106 +OK: 115 Failed: 0 -Warnings: 0 -Skipped: 3 +Warnings: 2 +Skipped: 2 |