diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'test.log')
| -rw-r--r-- | test.log | 386 |
1 files changed, 9 insertions, 377 deletions
@@ -2,394 +2,26 @@ Loading mkin Testing mkin ✔ | OK F W S | Context
⠏ | 0 | Export dataset for reading into CAKE
✔ | 1 | Export dataset for reading into CAKE -
⠏ | 0 | Error model fitting
⠋ | 1 | Error model fitting
⠹ | 3 | Error model fitting
⠸ | 4 | Error model fitting
⠼ | 5 | Error model fitting
⠴ | 6 | Error model fitting
⠧ | 8 | Error model fitting
⠏ | 10 | Error model fitting
⠋ | 10 1 | Error model fitting
⠋ | 10 1 | Error model fitting
⠋ | 10 1 | Error model fitting
⠋ | 10 1 | Error model fitting
⠋ | 10 1 | Error model fitting
⠋ | 10 1 | Error model fitting
⠋ | 11 | Error model fittingSum of squared residuals at call 1: 1590.602 -Sum of squared residuals at call 3: 1590.601 -Sum of squared residuals at call 5: 999.7593 -Sum of squared residuals at call 7: 999.7513 -Sum of squared residuals at call 8: 979.5713 -Sum of squared residuals at call 9: 948.3366 -Sum of squared residuals at call 10: 855.9518 -Sum of squared residuals at call 13: 836.4547 -Sum of squared residuals at call 14: 836.4547 -Sum of squared residuals at call 16: 836.422 -Sum of squared residuals at call 19: 836.422 -Sum of squared residuals at call 23: 836.422 -Sum of squared residuals at call 24: 836.422 -Negative log-likelihood at call 30: 65.71278 -
⠹ | 13 | Error model fittingNegative log-likelihood at call 1: 4104.4 -Negative log-likelihood at call 2: 4104.4 -Negative log-likelihood at call 4: 4104.399 -Negative log-likelihood at call 6: 85.79717 -Negative log-likelihood at call 11: 72.50327 -Negative log-likelihood at call 12: 72.50327 -Negative log-likelihood at call 17: 71.79809 -Negative log-likelihood at call 22: 71.10373 -Negative log-likelihood at call 26: 71.10373 -Negative log-likelihood at call 27: 70.84093 -Negative log-likelihood at call 29: 70.84093 -Negative log-likelihood at call 32: 70.64538 -Negative log-likelihood at call 37: 70.64538 -Negative log-likelihood at call 38: 70.33707 -Negative log-likelihood at call 40: 70.33707 -Negative log-likelihood at call 42: 70.33707 -Negative log-likelihood at call 43: 69.89484 -Negative log-likelihood at call 48: 69.05915 -Negative log-likelihood at call 53: 67.99547 -Negative log-likelihood at call 56: 67.99547 -Negative log-likelihood at call 58: 66.59808 -Negative log-likelihood at call 63: 66.59808 -Negative log-likelihood at call 64: 66.2343 -Negative log-likelihood at call 65: 66.23429 -Negative log-likelihood at call 68: 66.23428 -Negative log-likelihood at call 69: 65.67228 -Negative log-likelihood at call 70: 65.67228 -Negative log-likelihood at call 73: 65.67227 -Negative log-likelihood at call 74: 65.33106 -Negative log-likelihood at call 79: 65.31005 -Negative log-likelihood at call 80: 65.31005 -Negative log-likelihood at call 81: 65.31005 -Negative log-likelihood at call 83: 65.31004 -Negative log-likelihood at call 84: 65.17731 -Negative log-likelihood at call 85: 65.17731 -Negative log-likelihood at call 89: 65.16821 -Negative log-likelihood at call 94: 65.13357 -Negative log-likelihood at call 96: 65.13357 -Negative log-likelihood at call 98: 65.13357 -Negative log-likelihood at call 99: 65.08107 -Negative log-likelihood at call 104: 64.86685 -Negative log-likelihood at call 105: 64.86685 -Negative log-likelihood at call 109: 64.50332 -Negative log-likelihood at call 112: 64.50332 -Negative log-likelihood at call 114: 64.10889 -Negative log-likelihood at call 119: 63.57448 -Negative log-likelihood at call 120: 63.57448 -Negative log-likelihood at call 123: 63.57448 -Negative log-likelihood at call 124: 63.5456 -Negative log-likelihood at call 127: 63.5456 -Negative log-likelihood at call 129: 63.48903 -Negative log-likelihood at call 131: 63.48903 -Negative log-likelihood at call 135: 63.47608 -Negative log-likelihood at call 140: 63.47181 -Negative log-likelihood at call 141: 63.47181 -Negative log-likelihood at call 145: 63.4714 -Negative log-likelihood at call 146: 63.4714 -Negative log-likelihood at call 151: 63.4714 -Negative log-likelihood at call 152: 63.4714 -Negative log-likelihood at call 160: 63.4714 -Negative log-likelihood at call 169: 63.4714 -
⠸ | 14 | Error model fittingSum of squared residuals at call 1: 1590.602 -Sum of squared residuals at call 3: 1590.601 -Sum of squared residuals at call 5: 999.7593 -Sum of squared residuals at call 7: 999.7513 -Sum of squared residuals at call 8: 979.5713 -Sum of squared residuals at call 9: 948.3366 -Sum of squared residuals at call 10: 855.9518 -Sum of squared residuals at call 13: 836.4547 -Sum of squared residuals at call 14: 836.4547 -Sum of squared residuals at call 16: 836.422 -Sum of squared residuals at call 19: 836.422 -Sum of squared residuals at call 23: 836.422 -Sum of squared residuals at call 24: 836.422 -Negative log-likelihood at call 32: 7208.014 -Negative log-likelihood at call 34: 7208.013 -Negative log-likelihood at call 36: 132.2815 -Negative log-likelihood at call 41: 75.57291 -Negative log-likelihood at call 42: 75.57291 -Negative log-likelihood at call 45: 75.57291 -Negative log-likelihood at call 47: 73.57761 -Negative log-likelihood at call 52: 70.3766 -Negative log-likelihood at call 57: 68.75449 -Negative log-likelihood at call 62: 68.50149 -Negative log-likelihood at call 64: 68.50149 -Negative log-likelihood at call 66: 68.50146 -Negative log-likelihood at call 67: 68.2035 -Negative log-likelihood at call 71: 68.2035 -Negative log-likelihood at call 72: 68.13162 -Negative log-likelihood at call 77: 67.94078 -Negative log-likelihood at call 78: 67.60889 -Negative log-likelihood at call 80: 67.60889 -Negative log-likelihood at call 83: 66.72645 -Negative log-likelihood at call 88: 65.66209 -Negative log-likelihood at call 93: 64.79703 -Negative log-likelihood at call 98: 64.6745 -Negative log-likelihood at call 101: 64.6745 -Negative log-likelihood at call 102: 64.6745 -Negative log-likelihood at call 103: 64.60902 -Negative log-likelihood at call 108: 64.56616 -Negative log-likelihood at call 113: 64.55458 -Negative log-likelihood at call 117: 64.55458 -Negative log-likelihood at call 119: 64.50796 -Negative log-likelihood at call 121: 64.50796 -Negative log-likelihood at call 124: 64.41361 -Negative log-likelihood at call 129: 64.2052 -Negative log-likelihood at call 134: 63.92264 -Negative log-likelihood at call 139: 63.66033 -Negative log-likelihood at call 140: 63.66033 -Negative log-likelihood at call 142: 63.66033 -Negative log-likelihood at call 144: 63.55606 -Negative log-likelihood at call 146: 63.55606 -Negative log-likelihood at call 149: 63.48537 -Negative log-likelihood at call 150: 63.48537 -Negative log-likelihood at call 154: 63.47183 -Negative log-likelihood at call 156: 63.47183 -Negative log-likelihood at call 157: 63.47183 -Negative log-likelihood at call 159: 63.47141 -Negative log-likelihood at call 160: 63.47141 -Negative log-likelihood at call 162: 63.47141 -Negative log-likelihood at call 164: 63.4714 -Negative log-likelihood at call 165: 63.4714 -Negative log-likelihood at call 168: 63.4714 -Negative log-likelihood at call 172: 63.4714 -Negative log-likelihood at call 173: 63.4714 -Negative log-likelihood at call 181: 63.4714 -Negative log-likelihood at call 182: 63.4714 -Negative log-likelihood at call 191: 63.4714 -
⠼ | 15 | Error model fittingSum of squared residuals at call 1: 1590.602 -Sum of squared residuals at call 3: 1590.601 -Sum of squared residuals at call 5: 999.7593 -Sum of squared residuals at call 7: 999.7513 -Sum of squared residuals at call 8: 979.5713 -Sum of squared residuals at call 9: 948.3366 -Sum of squared residuals at call 10: 855.9518 -Sum of squared residuals at call 13: 836.4547 -Sum of squared residuals at call 14: 836.4547 -Sum of squared residuals at call 16: 836.422 -Sum of squared residuals at call 19: 836.422 -Sum of squared residuals at call 23: 836.422 -Sum of squared residuals at call 24: 836.422 -Negative log-likelihood at call 32: 7208.013 -Negative log-likelihood at call 34: 164.0572 -Negative log-likelihood at call 37: 139.4622 -Negative log-likelihood at call 40: 138.9749 -Negative log-likelihood at call 43: 134.4266 -Negative log-likelihood at call 46: 108.9584 -Negative log-likelihood at call 49: 98.97929 -Negative log-likelihood at call 52: 91.49458 -Negative log-likelihood at call 55: 87.49741 -Negative log-likelihood at call 57: 87.49741 -Negative log-likelihood at call 58: 85.29177 -Negative log-likelihood at call 61: 84.23711 -Negative log-likelihood at call 64: 83.76617 -Negative log-likelihood at call 67: 83.53472 -Negative log-likelihood at call 70: 83.33848 -Negative log-likelihood at call 73: 83.00488 -Negative log-likelihood at call 76: 82.06707 -Negative log-likelihood at call 77: 82.06707 -Negative log-likelihood at call 79: 75.48058 -Negative log-likelihood at call 82: 69.27829 -Negative log-likelihood at call 85: 66.14308 -Negative log-likelihood at call 86: 66.14306 -Negative log-likelihood at call 90: 65.73421 -Negative log-likelihood at call 91: 65.73421 -Negative log-likelihood at call 94: 65.71278 -Negative log-likelihood at call 98: 65.71278 -Negative log-likelihood at call 99: 65.71278 -Negative log-likelihood at call 127: 65.71278 -
⠴ | 16 | Error model fittingSum of squared residuals at call 1: 1590.602 -Sum of squared residuals at call 3: 1590.601 -Sum of squared residuals at call 5: 999.7593 -Sum of squared residuals at call 7: 999.7513 -Sum of squared residuals at call 8: 979.5713 -Sum of squared residuals at call 9: 948.3366 -Sum of squared residuals at call 10: 855.9518 -Sum of squared residuals at call 13: 836.4547 -Sum of squared residuals at call 14: 836.4547 -Sum of squared residuals at call 16: 836.422 -Sum of squared residuals at call 19: 836.422 -Sum of squared residuals at call 23: 836.422 -Sum of squared residuals at call 24: 836.422 -Negative log-likelihood at call 32: 7208.013 -Negative log-likelihood at call 34: 164.0572 -Negative log-likelihood at call 37: 139.4622 -Negative log-likelihood at call 40: 138.9749 -Negative log-likelihood at call 43: 134.4266 -Negative log-likelihood at call 46: 108.9584 -Negative log-likelihood at call 49: 98.97929 -Negative log-likelihood at call 52: 91.49458 -Negative log-likelihood at call 55: 87.49741 -Negative log-likelihood at call 57: 87.49741 -Negative log-likelihood at call 58: 85.29177 -Negative log-likelihood at call 61: 84.23711 -Negative log-likelihood at call 64: 83.76617 -Negative log-likelihood at call 67: 83.53472 -Negative log-likelihood at call 70: 83.33848 -Negative log-likelihood at call 73: 83.00488 -Negative log-likelihood at call 76: 82.06707 -Negative log-likelihood at call 77: 82.06707 -Negative log-likelihood at call 79: 75.48058 -Negative log-likelihood at call 82: 69.27829 -Negative log-likelihood at call 85: 66.14308 -Negative log-likelihood at call 86: 66.14306 -Negative log-likelihood at call 90: 65.73421 -Negative log-likelihood at call 91: 65.73421 -Negative log-likelihood at call 94: 65.71278 -Negative log-likelihood at call 98: 65.71278 -Negative log-likelihood at call 99: 65.71278 -Negative log-likelihood at call 132: 65.71278 -
⠦ | 17 | Error model fittingSum of squared residuals at call 1: 1590.602 -Sum of squared residuals at call 3: 1590.601 -Sum of squared residuals at call 5: 999.7593 -Sum of squared residuals at call 7: 999.7513 -Sum of squared residuals at call 8: 979.5713 -Sum of squared residuals at call 9: 948.3366 -Sum of squared residuals at call 10: 855.9518 -Sum of squared residuals at call 13: 836.4547 -Sum of squared residuals at call 14: 836.4547 -Sum of squared residuals at call 16: 836.422 -Sum of squared residuals at call 19: 836.422 -Sum of squared residuals at call 23: 836.422 -Sum of squared residuals at call 24: 836.422 -Negative log-likelihood at call 32: 7208.013 -Negative log-likelihood at call 34: 164.0572 -Negative log-likelihood at call 37: 139.4622 -Negative log-likelihood at call 40: 138.9749 -Negative log-likelihood at call 43: 134.4266 -Negative log-likelihood at call 46: 108.9584 -Negative log-likelihood at call 49: 98.97929 -Negative log-likelihood at call 52: 91.49458 -Negative log-likelihood at call 55: 87.49741 -Negative log-likelihood at call 57: 87.49741 -Negative log-likelihood at call 58: 85.29177 -Negative log-likelihood at call 61: 84.23711 -Negative log-likelihood at call 64: 83.76617 -Negative log-likelihood at call 67: 83.53472 -Negative log-likelihood at call 70: 83.33848 -Negative log-likelihood at call 73: 83.00488 -Negative log-likelihood at call 76: 82.06707 -Negative log-likelihood at call 77: 82.06707 -Negative log-likelihood at call 79: 75.48058 -Negative log-likelihood at call 82: 69.27829 -Negative log-likelihood at call 85: 66.14308 -Negative log-likelihood at call 86: 66.14306 -Negative log-likelihood at call 90: 65.73421 -Negative log-likelihood at call 91: 65.73421 -Negative log-likelihood at call 94: 65.71278 -Negative log-likelihood at call 98: 65.71278 -Negative log-likelihood at call 99: 65.71278 -Negative log-likelihood at call 118: 65.71278 -Negative log-likelihood at call 134: 65.71278 -
⠧ | 18 | Error model fittingNegative log-likelihood at call 1: 4104.4 -Negative log-likelihood at call 2: 4104.4 -Negative log-likelihood at call 4: 4104.399 -Negative log-likelihood at call 6: 85.79717 -Negative log-likelihood at call 11: 72.50327 -Negative log-likelihood at call 12: 72.50327 -Negative log-likelihood at call 17: 71.79809 -Negative log-likelihood at call 22: 71.10373 -Negative log-likelihood at call 26: 71.10373 -Negative log-likelihood at call 27: 70.84093 -Negative log-likelihood at call 29: 70.84093 -Negative log-likelihood at call 32: 70.64538 -Negative log-likelihood at call 37: 70.64538 -Negative log-likelihood at call 38: 70.33707 -Negative log-likelihood at call 40: 70.33707 -Negative log-likelihood at call 42: 70.33707 -Negative log-likelihood at call 43: 69.89484 -Negative log-likelihood at call 48: 69.05915 -Negative log-likelihood at call 53: 67.99547 -Negative log-likelihood at call 56: 67.99547 -Negative log-likelihood at call 58: 66.59808 -Negative log-likelihood at call 63: 66.59808 -Negative log-likelihood at call 64: 66.2343 -Negative log-likelihood at call 65: 66.23429 -Negative log-likelihood at call 68: 66.23428 -Negative log-likelihood at call 69: 65.67228 -Negative log-likelihood at call 70: 65.67228 -Negative log-likelihood at call 73: 65.67227 -Negative log-likelihood at call 74: 65.33106 -Negative log-likelihood at call 79: 65.31005 -Negative log-likelihood at call 80: 65.31005 -Negative log-likelihood at call 81: 65.31005 -Negative log-likelihood at call 83: 65.31004 -Negative log-likelihood at call 84: 65.17731 -Negative log-likelihood at call 85: 65.17731 -Negative log-likelihood at call 89: 65.16821 -Negative log-likelihood at call 94: 65.13357 -Negative log-likelihood at call 96: 65.13357 -Negative log-likelihood at call 98: 65.13357 -Negative log-likelihood at call 99: 65.08107 -Negative log-likelihood at call 104: 64.86685 -Negative log-likelihood at call 105: 64.86685 -Negative log-likelihood at call 109: 64.50332 -Negative log-likelihood at call 112: 64.50332 -Negative log-likelihood at call 114: 64.10889 -Negative log-likelihood at call 119: 63.57448 -Negative log-likelihood at call 120: 63.57448 -Negative log-likelihood at call 123: 63.57448 -Negative log-likelihood at call 124: 63.5456 -Negative log-likelihood at call 127: 63.5456 -Negative log-likelihood at call 129: 63.48903 -Negative log-likelihood at call 131: 63.48903 -Negative log-likelihood at call 135: 63.47608 -Negative log-likelihood at call 140: 63.47181 -Negative log-likelihood at call 141: 63.47181 -Negative log-likelihood at call 145: 63.4714 -Negative log-likelihood at call 146: 63.4714 -Negative log-likelihood at call 151: 63.4714 -Negative log-likelihood at call 152: 63.4714 -Negative log-likelihood at call 160: 63.4714 -Negative log-likelihood at call 169: 63.4714 -Sum of squared residuals at call 179: 1590.602 -Sum of squared residuals at call 181: 1590.601 -Sum of squared residuals at call 183: 999.7593 -Sum of squared residuals at call 185: 999.7513 -Sum of squared residuals at call 186: 979.5713 -Sum of squared residuals at call 187: 948.3366 -Sum of squared residuals at call 188: 855.9518 -Sum of squared residuals at call 191: 836.4547 -Sum of squared residuals at call 192: 836.4547 -Sum of squared residuals at call 194: 836.422 -Sum of squared residuals at call 197: 836.422 -Sum of squared residuals at call 201: 836.422 -Sum of squared residuals at call 202: 836.422 -Negative log-likelihood at call 210: 7208.013 -Negative log-likelihood at call 212: 164.0572 -Negative log-likelihood at call 215: 139.4622 -Negative log-likelihood at call 218: 138.9749 -Negative log-likelihood at call 221: 134.4266 -Negative log-likelihood at call 224: 108.9584 -Negative log-likelihood at call 227: 98.97929 -Negative log-likelihood at call 230: 91.49458 -Negative log-likelihood at call 233: 87.49741 -Negative log-likelihood at call 235: 87.49741 -Negative log-likelihood at call 236: 85.29177 -Negative log-likelihood at call 239: 84.23711 -Negative log-likelihood at call 242: 83.76617 -Negative log-likelihood at call 245: 83.53472 -Negative log-likelihood at call 248: 83.33848 -Negative log-likelihood at call 251: 83.00488 -Negative log-likelihood at call 254: 82.06707 -Negative log-likelihood at call 255: 82.06707 -Negative log-likelihood at call 257: 75.48058 -Negative log-likelihood at call 260: 69.27829 -Negative log-likelihood at call 263: 66.14308 -Negative log-likelihood at call 264: 66.14306 -Negative log-likelihood at call 268: 65.73421 -Negative log-likelihood at call 269: 65.73421 -Negative log-likelihood at call 272: 65.71278 -Negative log-likelihood at call 276: 65.71278 -Negative log-likelihood at call 277: 65.71278 -Negative log-likelihood at call 305: 65.71278 -
⠇ | 19 | Error model fitting
⠏ | 20 | Error model fitting
✔ | 20 | Error model fitting [506.4 s] -
⠏ | 0 | Calculation of FOCUS chi2 error levels
⠋ | 1 | Calculation of FOCUS chi2 error levels
⠹ | 3 | Calculation of FOCUS chi2 error levels
⠼ | 5 | Calculation of FOCUS chi2 error levels
✔ | 5 | Calculation of FOCUS chi2 error levels [3.6 s] -
⠏ | 0 | Results for FOCUS D established in expertise for UBA (Ranke 2014)
⠋ | 1 | Results for FOCUS D established in expertise for UBA (Ranke 2014)
⠙ | 2 | Results for FOCUS D established in expertise for UBA (Ranke 2014)
⠸ | 4 | Results for FOCUS D established in expertise for UBA (Ranke 2014)
⠇ | 9 | Results for FOCUS D established in expertise for UBA (Ranke 2014)
✔ | 13 | Results for FOCUS D established in expertise for UBA (Ranke 2014) [3.8 s] +
⠏ | 0 | Error model fitting
⠋ | 1 | Error model fitting
⠹ | 3 | Error model fitting
⠸ | 4 | Error model fitting
⠼ | 5 | Error model fitting
⠴ | 6 | Error model fitting
⠧ | 8 | Error model fitting
⠏ | 10 | Error model fitting
⠋ | 10 1 | Error model fitting
⠋ | 10 1 | Error model fitting
⠋ | 10 1 | Error model fitting
⠋ | 10 1 | Error model fitting
⠋ | 10 1 | Error model fitting
⠋ | 10 1 | Error model fitting
⠋ | 10 1 | Error model fitting
⠋ | 10 1 | Error model fitting
⠋ | 10 1 | Error model fitting
⠋ | 10 1 | Error model fitting
⠋ | 10 1 | Error model fitting
⠋ | 11 | Error model fitting
⠹ | 13 | Error model fitting
⠸ | 14 | Error model fitting
⠼ | 15 | Error model fitting
⠴ | 16 | Error model fitting
⠦ | 17 | Error model fitting
⠧ | 18 | Error model fitting
⠇ | 19 | Error model fitting
⠏ | 20 | Error model fitting
✔ | 20 | Error model fitting [414.2 s] +
⠏ | 0 | Calculation of FOCUS chi2 error levels
⠋ | 1 | Calculation of FOCUS chi2 error levels
⠹ | 3 | Calculation of FOCUS chi2 error levels
⠼ | 5 | Calculation of FOCUS chi2 error levels
✔ | 5 | Calculation of FOCUS chi2 error levels [3.5 s] +
⠏ | 0 | Results for FOCUS D established in expertise for UBA (Ranke 2014)
⠋ | 1 | Results for FOCUS D established in expertise for UBA (Ranke 2014)
⠙ | 2 | Results for FOCUS D established in expertise for UBA (Ranke 2014)
⠸ | 4 | Results for FOCUS D established in expertise for UBA (Ranke 2014)
⠇ | 9 | Results for FOCUS D established in expertise for UBA (Ranke 2014)
✔ | 13 | Results for FOCUS D established in expertise for UBA (Ranke 2014) [3.7 s]
⠏ | 0 | Test fitting the decline of metabolites from their maximum
⠋ | 1 | Test fitting the decline of metabolites from their maximum
⠹ | 3 | Test fitting the decline of metabolites from their maximum
⠼ | 5 | Test fitting the decline of metabolites from their maximum
✔ | 6 | Test fitting the decline of metabolites from their maximum [0.9 s]
⠏ | 0 | Fitting the logistic model
⠋ | 1 | Fitting the logistic model
✔ | 1 | Fitting the logistic model [0.9 s]
⠏ | 0 | Test dataset class mkinds used in gmkin
✔ | 1 | Test dataset class mkinds used in gmkin -
⠏ | 0 | Special cases of mkinfit calls
⠋ | 1 | Special cases of mkinfit calls
⠇ | 9 | Special cases of mkinfit calls
⠏ | 10 | Special cases of mkinfit calls
⠋ | 11 | Special cases of mkinfit calls
⠙ | 12 | Special cases of mkinfit calls
✔ | 12 | Special cases of mkinfit calls [2.7 s] +
⠏ | 0 | Special cases of mkinfit calls
⠋ | 1 | Special cases of mkinfit calls
⠇ | 9 | Special cases of mkinfit calls
⠏ | 10 | Special cases of mkinfit calls
⠋ | 11 | Special cases of mkinfit calls
⠙ | 12 | Special cases of mkinfit calls
✔ | 12 | Special cases of mkinfit calls [2.6 s]
⠏ | 0 | mkinmod model generation and printing
⠇ | 9 | mkinmod model generation and printing
✔ | 9 | mkinmod model generation and printing [0.2 s]
⠏ | 0 | Model predictions with mkinpredict
⠋ | 1 | Model predictions with mkinpredict
✔ | 3 | Model predictions with mkinpredict [0.3 s] -
⠏ | 0 | Evaluations according to 2015 NAFTA guidance
⠙ | 2 | Evaluations according to 2015 NAFTA guidance
⠇ | 9 | Evaluations according to 2015 NAFTA guidance
⠏ | 10 | Evaluations according to 2015 NAFTA guidance
⠴ | 16 | Evaluations according to 2015 NAFTA guidance
✔ | 16 | Evaluations according to 2015 NAFTA guidance [4.1 s] -
⠏ | 0 | Fitting of parent only models
⠋ | 1 | Fitting of parent only models
⠙ | 2 | Fitting of parent only models
⠹ | 3 | Fitting of parent only models
⠸ | 4 | Fitting of parent only models
⠼ | 5 | Fitting of parent only models
⠴ | 6 | Fitting of parent only models
⠦ | 7 | Fitting of parent only models
⠧ | 8 | Fitting of parent only models
⠇ | 9 | Fitting of parent only models
⠏ | 10 | Fitting of parent only models
⠋ | 11 | Fitting of parent only models
⠙ | 12 | Fitting of parent only models
⠹ | 13 | Fitting of parent only models
⠴ | 16 | Fitting of parent only models
⠧ | 18 | Fitting of parent only models
⠏ | 20 | Fitting of parent only models
✔ | 21 | Fitting of parent only models [40.9 s] +
⠏ | 0 | Evaluations according to 2015 NAFTA guidance
⠙ | 2 | Evaluations according to 2015 NAFTA guidance
⠇ | 9 | Evaluations according to 2015 NAFTA guidance
⠏ | 10 | Evaluations according to 2015 NAFTA guidance
⠴ | 16 | Evaluations according to 2015 NAFTA guidance
✔ | 16 | Evaluations according to 2015 NAFTA guidance [4.0 s] +
⠏ | 0 | Fitting of parent only models
⠋ | 1 | Fitting of parent only models
⠙ | 2 | Fitting of parent only models
⠹ | 3 | Fitting of parent only models
⠸ | 4 | Fitting of parent only models
⠼ | 5 | Fitting of parent only models
⠴ | 6 | Fitting of parent only models
⠦ | 7 | Fitting of parent only models
⠧ | 8 | Fitting of parent only models
⠇ | 9 | Fitting of parent only models
⠏ | 10 | Fitting of parent only models
⠋ | 11 | Fitting of parent only models
⠙ | 12 | Fitting of parent only models
⠹ | 13 | Fitting of parent only models
⠴ | 16 | Fitting of parent only models
⠧ | 18 | Fitting of parent only models
⠏ | 20 | Fitting of parent only models
✔ | 21 | Fitting of parent only models [40.7 s]
⠏ | 0 | Calculation of maximum time weighted average concentrations (TWAs)
⠋ | 1 | Calculation of maximum time weighted average concentrations (TWAs)
⠙ | 2 | Calculation of maximum time weighted average concentrations (TWAs)
⠹ | 3 | Calculation of maximum time weighted average concentrations (TWAs)
⠸ | 4 | Calculation of maximum time weighted average concentrations (TWAs)
✔ | 4 | Calculation of maximum time weighted average concentrations (TWAs) [2.2 s]
⠏ | 0 | Summary
✔ | 1 | Summary
⠏ | 0 | Plotting
⠹ | 3 | Plotting
✔ | 4 | Plotting [0.3 s]
⠏ | 0 | AIC calculation
✔ | 2 | AIC calculation -
⠏ | 0 | Complex test case from Schaefer et al. (2007) Piacenza paper
⠋ | 1 | Complex test case from Schaefer et al. (2007) Piacenza paper
✔ | 2 | Complex test case from Schaefer et al. (2007) Piacenza paper [5.4 s] -
⠏ | 0 | Results for synthetic data established in expertise for UBA (Ranke 2014)
⠋ | 1 | Results for synthetic data established in expertise for UBA (Ranke 2014)
⠹ | 3 | Results for synthetic data established in expertise for UBA (Ranke 2014)
✔ | 4 | Results for synthetic data established in expertise for UBA (Ranke 2014) [7.2 s] +
⠏ | 0 | Complex test case from Schaefer et al. (2007) Piacenza paper
⠋ | 1 | Complex test case from Schaefer et al. (2007) Piacenza paper
✔ | 2 | Complex test case from Schaefer et al. (2007) Piacenza paper [5.3 s] +
⠏ | 0 | Results for synthetic data established in expertise for UBA (Ranke 2014)
⠋ | 1 | Results for synthetic data established in expertise for UBA (Ranke 2014)
⠹ | 3 | Results for synthetic data established in expertise for UBA (Ranke 2014)
✔ | 4 | Results for synthetic data established in expertise for UBA (Ranke 2014) [7.1 s] ══ Results ═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════ -Duration: 584.3 s +Duration: 491.4 s OK: 125 Failed: 0 |