mkin - Fitting kinetic models to chemical degradation data (also on github)

Age	Commit message (Collapse)	Author	Files	Lines
2022-03-07	Remove nlmixr interface for release of mkin 1.1.0	Johannes Ranke	1	-245/+0
	I am postponing my attempts to get the nlmixr interface to CRAN, given some problems with nlmixr using R-devel under Windows, see https://github.com/nlmixrdevelopment/nlmixr/issues/596 and https://github.com/r-hub/rhub/issues/512, which is fixed by the removal of nlmixr from the testsuite. For the tests to be more platform independent, the biphasic mixed effects models test dataset was defined in a way that fitting should be more robust (less ill-defined).
2022-03-02	Make tests more platform independent, update docs	Johannes Ranke	1	-2/+1

2022-03-02	Fix nlmixr fits with parallel metabolites	Johannes Ranke	1	-0/+24

2021-10-05	Update docs	Johannes Ranke	1	-3/+5

2021-09-29	Reduce noise in nlmixr.mmkin output in examples	Johannes Ranke	1	-14/+25

2021-09-27	intervals() methods, more DFOP/tc variants	Johannes Ranke	1	-2/+2

2021-06-17	Let backtransform_odeparms handle nlmixr formation fractions	Johannes Ranke	1	-4/+11
	Also adapt summary.nlmixr.mmkin to correctly handle the way formation fractions are translated to nlmixr
2021-06-11	Finished 'summary.nlmixr.mmkin', checks, docs	Johannes Ranke	1	-5/+19

2021-06-09	Rudimentary support for setting up nlmixr models	Johannes Ranke	1	-0/+188
	- All degradation models are specified as ODE models. This appears to be fast enough - Error models are being translated to nlmixr as close to the mkin error model as possible. When using the 'saem' backend, it appears not to be possible to use the same error model for more than one observed variable - No support yet for models with parallel formation of metabolites, where the ilr transformation is used in mkin per default - There is a bug in nlmixr which appears to be triggered if the data are not balanced, see nlmixrdevelopment/nlmixr#530 - There is a print and a plot method, the summary method is not finished