From a47f458cf4b2433cdc9a75f62cb1d9fb2287d083 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Johannes Ranke Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2023 14:28:18 +0200 Subject: Run tests on slimbook: 573.5 s Compared with 262.6 s on my main desktop --- log/test.log | 139 ++++++++++++++++------------------------------------------- 1 file changed, 36 insertions(+), 103 deletions(-) diff --git a/log/test.log b/log/test.log index 6d5bc470..461e6868 100644 --- a/log/test.log +++ b/log/test.log @@ -1,117 +1,50 @@ ℹ Testing mkin ✔ | F W S OK | Context ✔ | 5 | AIC calculation -✔ | 5 | Analytical solutions for coupled models [1.5s] +✔ | 5 | Analytical solutions for coupled models [2.4s] ✔ | 5 | Calculation of Akaike weights ✔ | 3 | Export dataset for reading into CAKE -✔ | 6 | Use of precompiled symbols in mkinpredict [3.1s] -✔ | 12 | Confidence intervals and p-values [0.4s] -✔ | 1 12 | Dimethenamid data from 2018 [13.2s] -──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── -Skip ('test_dmta.R:88:3'): Different backends get consistent results for SFO-SFO3+, dimethenamid data -Reason: Fitting this ODE model with saemix takes about 5 minutes on my new system -──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── -✔ | 14 | Error model fitting [2.5s] +✔ | 6 | Use of precompiled symbols in mkinpredict [5.7s] +✔ | 12 | Confidence intervals and p-values +✔ | 1 12 | Dimethenamid data from 2018 [25.0s] +✔ | 14 | Error model fitting [5.3s] ✔ | 5 | Time step normalisation -✔ | 4 | Calculation of FOCUS chi2 error levels [0.3s] -✔ | 14 | Results for FOCUS D established in expertise for UBA (Ranke 2014) [0.4s] -✔ | 4 | Test fitting the decline of metabolites from their maximum [0.2s] -✔ | 1 | Fitting the logistic model [0.1s] -✔ | 10 | Batch fitting and diagnosing hierarchical kinetic models [19.0s] -✖ | 1 2 15 | Nonlinear mixed-effects models [149.2s] -──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── -Failure ('test_mixed.R:21:3'): Print methods work -Results have changed from known value recorded in 'print_dfop_saem_1.txt'. - -old[13:23] vs new[13:23] - "" - "Fitted parameters:" - " estimate lower upper" -- "parent_0 99.92 98.77 101.06" -+ "parent_0 99.96 98.82 101.11" -- "log_k1 -2.72 -2.95 -2.50" -+ "log_k1 -2.71 -2.94 -2.49" -- "log_k2 -4.14 -4.27 -4.01" -+ "log_k2 -4.14 -4.26 -4.01" -- "g_qlogis -0.35 -0.53 -0.16" -+ "g_qlogis -0.36 -0.54 -0.17" -- "a.1 0.92 0.68 1.16" -+ "a.1 0.93 0.69 1.17" - "b.1 0.05 0.04 0.06" - "SD.log_k1 0.37 0.23 0.51" -and 1 more ... - -Skip ('test_mixed.R:80:3'): saemix results are reproducible for biphasic fits -Reason: Fitting with saemix takes around 10 minutes when using deSolve - -Skip ('test_mixed.R:133:3'): SFO-SFO saemix specific analytical solution work -Reason: This is seldom used, so save some time -──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── +✔ | 4 | Calculation of FOCUS chi2 error levels +✔ | 14 | Results for FOCUS D established in expertise for UBA (Ranke 2014) +✔ | 4 | Test fitting the decline of metabolites from their maximum +✔ | 1 | Fitting the logistic model +✔ | 10 | Batch fitting and diagnosing hierarchical kinetic models [39.8s] +✔ | 2 16 | Nonlinear mixed-effects models [351.2s] ✔ | 3 | Test dataset classes mkinds and mkindsg -✔ | 10 | Special cases of mkinfit calls [0.3s] -✔ | 3 | mkinfit features [0.5s] +✔ | 10 | Special cases of mkinfit calls +✔ | 3 | mkinfit features ✔ | 8 | mkinmod model generation and printing -✔ | 3 | Model predictions with mkinpredict [0.1s] -✖ | 3 9 | Multistart method for saem.mmkin models [23.2s] -──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── -Failure ('test_multistart.R:44:3'): multistart works for saem.mmkin models -Snapshot of `testcase` to 'multistart/mixed-model-fit-for-saem-object-with-mkin-transformations.svg' has changed -Run `testthat::snapshot_review('multistart/')` to review changes -Backtrace: - 1. vdiffr::expect_doppelganger(...) - at test_multistart.R:44:2 - 3. testthat::expect_snapshot_file(...) - -Failure ('test_multistart.R:55:3'): multistart works for saem.mmkin models -Snapshot of `testcase` to 'multistart/llhist-for-dfop-sfo-fit.svg' has changed -Run `testthat::snapshot_review('multistart/')` to review changes -Backtrace: - 1. vdiffr::expect_doppelganger("llhist for dfop sfo fit", llhist_dfop_sfo) - at test_multistart.R:55:2 - 3. testthat::expect_snapshot_file(...) - -Failure ('test_multistart.R:56:3'): multistart works for saem.mmkin models -Snapshot of `testcase` to 'multistart/parplot-for-dfop-sfo-fit.svg' has changed -Run `testthat::snapshot_review('multistart/')` to review changes -Backtrace: - 1. vdiffr::expect_doppelganger("parplot for dfop sfo fit", parplot_dfop_sfo) - at test_multistart.R:56:2 - 3. testthat::expect_snapshot_file(...) -──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── -✔ | 16 | Evaluations according to 2015 NAFTA guidance [1.6s] -✔ | 9 | Nonlinear mixed-effects models with nlme [3.8s] -✖ | 1 14 | Plotting [4.7s] -──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── -Failure ('test_plot.R:55:3'): Plotting mkinfit, mmkin and mixed model objects is reproducible -Snapshot of `testcase` to 'plot/mixed-model-fit-for-nlme-object.svg' has changed -Run `testthat::snapshot_review('plot/')` to review changes -Backtrace: - 1. vdiffr::expect_doppelganger(...) - at test_plot.R:55:2 - 3. testthat::expect_snapshot_file(...) -──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── +✔ | 3 | Model predictions with mkinpredict +✔ | 12 | Multistart method for saem.mmkin models [52.7s] +✔ | 16 | Evaluations according to 2015 NAFTA guidance [2.1s] +✔ | 9 | Nonlinear mixed-effects models with nlme [7.7s] +✔ | 15 | Plotting [8.2s] ✔ | 4 | Residuals extracted from mkinfit models -✔ | 1 36 | saemix parent models [31.4s] -──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── -Skip ('test_saemix_parent.R:143:3'): We can also use mkin solution methods for saem -Reason: This still takes almost 2.5 minutes although we do not solve ODEs -──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── -✔ | 2 | Complex test case from Schaefer et al. (2007) Piacenza paper [0.5s] +✔ | 1 36 | saemix parent models [56.3s] +✔ | 2 | Complex test case from Schaefer et al. (2007) Piacenza paper ✔ | 11 | Processing of residue series -✔ | 10 | Fitting the SFORB model [1.7s] +✔ | 10 | Fitting the SFORB model [2.6s] ✔ | 1 | Summaries of old mkinfit objects ✔ | 5 | Summary -✔ | 4 | Results for synthetic data established in expertise for UBA (Ranke 2014) [0.8s] -✔ | 9 | Hypothesis tests [2.9s] -✔ | 4 | Calculation of maximum time weighted average concentrations (TWAs) [0.7s] +✔ | 4 | Results for synthetic data established in expertise for UBA (Ranke 2014) [1.4s] +✔ | 9 | Hypothesis tests [6.1s] +✔ | 4 | Calculation of maximum time weighted average concentrations (TWAs) [1.4s] ══ Results ═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════ -Duration: 262.6 s - -── Skipped tests ────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── -• Fitting this ODE model with saemix takes about 5 minutes on my new system (1) -• Fitting with saemix takes around 10 minutes when using deSolve (1) -• This is seldom used, so save some time (1) -• This still takes almost 2.5 minutes although we do not solve ODEs (1) - -[ FAIL 5 | WARN 0 | SKIP 4 | PASS 276 ] +Duration: 573.5 s + +── Skipped tests (4) ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── +• Fitting this ODE model with saemix takes about 5 minutes on my new system + (1): 'test_dmta.R:88:3' +• Fitting with saemix takes around 10 minutes when using deSolve (1): + 'test_mixed.R:80:3' +• This is seldom used, so save some time (1): 'test_mixed.R:133:3' +• This still takes almost 2.5 minutes although we do not solve ODEs (1): + 'test_saemix_parent.R:143:3' + +[ FAIL 0 | WARN 0 | SKIP 4 | PASS 281 ] -- cgit v1.2.1