From e36a5db313365bc5acc85126792c767fe18acd71 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Johannes Ranke Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2019 19:12:47 +0200 Subject: Add sources for test data for better transparency --- man/experimental_data_for_UBA.Rd | 55 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 55 insertions(+) diff --git a/man/experimental_data_for_UBA.Rd b/man/experimental_data_for_UBA.Rd index 797444d8..e3386a2f 100644 --- a/man/experimental_data_for_UBA.Rd +++ b/man/experimental_data_for_UBA.Rd @@ -11,6 +11,37 @@ results are shown here do not imply a license to use them in the context of pesticide registrations, as the use of the data may be constrained by data protection regulations. + + Preprocessing of data was performed based on the recommendations of the FOCUS + kinetics workgroup (FOCUS, 2014) as described below. + + Datasets 1 and 2 are from the Renewal Assessment Report (RAR) for imazamox + (France, 2015, p. 15). For setting values reported as zero, an LOQ of 0.1 + was assumed. Metabolite residues reported for day zero were added to the + parent compound residues. + + Datasets 3 and 4 are from the Renewal Assessment Report (RAR) for isofetamid + (Belgium, 2014, p. 8) and show the data for two different radiolabels. For + dataset 4, the value given for the metabolite in the day zero sampling + in replicate B was added to the parent compound, following the respective + FOCUS recommendation. + + Dataset 5 is from the Renewal Assessment Report (RAR) for ethofumesate + (Austria, 2015, p. 16). + + Datasets 6 to 10 are from the Renewal Assessment Report (RAR) for glyphosate + (Germany, 2013a, pages 8, 28, 50, 51). For the initial sampling, + the residues given for the metabolite were added to the parent + value, following the recommendation of the FOCUS kinetics workgroup. + + Dataset 11 is from the Renewal Assessment Report (RAR) for 2,4-D + (Germany, 2013b, p. 644). Values reported as zero were set to NA, with + the exception of the day three sampling of metabolite A2, which was set + to one half of the LOD reported to be 1\% AR. + + Dataset 12 is from the Renewal Assessment Report (RAR) for thifensulfuron-methyl + (United Kingdom, 2014, p. 81). + } \usage{experimental_data_for_UBA_2019} \format{ @@ -22,8 +53,32 @@ } } \source{ + + Austria (2015). Ethofumesate Renewal Assessment Report Volume 3 Annex B.8 (AS) + + Belgium (2014). Isofetamid (IKF-5411) Draft Assessment Report Volume 3 Annex B.8 (AS) + + France (2015). Imazamox Draft Renewal Assessment Report Volume 3 Annex B.8 (AS) + + FOCUS (2014) \dQuote{Generic guidance for Estimating Persistence and + Degradation Kinetics from Environmental Fate Studies on Pesticides in EU + Registration} Report of the FOCUS Work Group on Degradation Kinetics, + Version 1.1, 18 December 2014 + \url{http://esdac.jrc.ec.europa.eu/projects/degradation-kinetics} + + Germany (2013a). Renewal Assessment Report Glyphosate Volume 3 Annex B.8: Environmental Fate + and Behaviour + + Germany (2013b). Renewal Assessment Report 2,4-D Volume 3 Annex B.8: Fate and behaviour in the + environment + Ranke (2019) Documentation of results obtained for the error model expertise written for the German Umweltbundesamt. + + United Kingdom (2014). Thifensulfuron-methyl - Annex B.8 (Volume 3) to the Report and Proposed + Decision of the United Kingdom made to the European Commission under Regulation (EC) No. + 1141/2010 for renewal of an active substance + } \examples{\dontrun{ -- cgit v1.2.1