From 4110808d1953b8704ef48d0dc5b5e445cbde9af0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Johannes Ranke Date: Tue, 20 May 2014 08:36:42 +0200 Subject: Step back regarding confidence intervals of formation fractions - Don't give confidence intervals for formation fractions that belong to a set, only for single formation fractions - Update the vignette with history and background - Correct 'isotropic' into 'isometric' in the ilr documentation, the README and the comments in transform_odeparms - Candidate for release to CRAN --- README.md | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'README.md') diff --git a/README.md b/README.md index 6b2fbede..9b510b0a 100644 --- a/README.md +++ b/README.md @@ -79,7 +79,7 @@ or the package vignettes referenced from the so their estimators can more reasonably be expected to follow a normal distribution. This has the side effect that no constraints are needed in the optimisation. Thanks to René Lehmann for the nice - cooperation on this, especially the isotropic logration transformation + cooperation on this, especially the isometric logration transformation that is now used for the formation fractions. * A side effect of this is that when parameter estimates are backtransformed to match the model definition, confidence intervals calculated from -- cgit v1.2.1