From 1511ed0a775e15ec2158e22d08a4da00cdd834aa Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Johannes Ranke Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2017 17:13:35 +0100 Subject: Use html_vignette for FOCUS_D vignette, fix address Static documentation articles rebuilt by pkgdown::build_articles() --- docs/articles/FOCUS_L.html | 79 +++++++++++++++++++++------------------------- 1 file changed, 36 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-) (limited to 'docs/articles/FOCUS_L.html') diff --git a/docs/articles/FOCUS_L.html b/docs/articles/FOCUS_L.html index b89c7b20..7cef7abd 100644 --- a/docs/articles/FOCUS_L.html +++ b/docs/articles/FOCUS_L.html @@ -62,14 +62,7 @@ News - + @@ -84,7 +77,7 @@

Example evaluation of FOCUS Laboratory Data L1 to L3

Johannes Ranke

-

2017-09-14

+

2017-11-16

@@ -105,17 +98,17 @@ FOCUS_2006_L1_mkin <- for parent only degradation models. The following two lines fit the model and produce the summary report of the model fit. This covers the numerical analysis given in the FOCUS report.

m.L1.SFO <- mkinfit("SFO", FOCUS_2006_L1_mkin, quiet = TRUE)
 summary(m.L1.SFO)
-
## mkin version:    0.9.46.1 
-## R version:       3.4.1 
-## Date of fit:     Thu Sep 14 12:15:03 2017 
-## Date of summary: Thu Sep 14 12:15:03 2017 
+
## mkin version:    0.9.46.2 
+## R version:       3.4.2 
+## Date of fit:     Thu Nov 16 17:12:46 2017 
+## Date of summary: Thu Nov 16 17:12:46 2017 
 ## 
 ## Equations:
 ## d_parent/dt = - k_parent_sink * parent
 ## 
 ## Model predictions using solution type analytical 
 ## 
-## Fitted with method Port using 37 model solutions performed in 0.255 s
+## Fitted with method Port using 37 model solutions performed in 0.253 s
 ## 
 ## Weighting: none
 ## 
@@ -198,10 +191,10 @@ FOCUS_2006_L1_mkin <- 
plot(m.L1.FOMC, show_errmin = TRUE, main = "FOCUS L1 - FOMC")

 

 
summary(m.L1.FOMC, data = FALSE)

-
## mkin version:    0.9.46.1 
-## R version:       3.4.1 
-## Date of fit:     Thu Sep 14 12:15:05 2017 
-## Date of summary: Thu Sep 14 12:15:05 2017 
+
## mkin version:    0.9.46.2 
+## R version:       3.4.2 
+## Date of fit:     Thu Nov 16 17:12:47 2017 
+## Date of summary: Thu Nov 16 17:12:47 2017 
 ## 
 ## 
 ## Warning: Optimisation by method Port did not converge.
@@ -213,7 +206,7 @@ FOCUS_2006_L1_mkin <-  main = "FOCUS L2 - FOMC")

 

 
summary(m.L2.FOMC, data = FALSE)

-
## mkin version:    0.9.46.1 
-## R version:       3.4.1 
-## Date of fit:     Thu Sep 14 12:15:06 2017 
-## Date of summary: Thu Sep 14 12:15:06 2017 
+
## mkin version:    0.9.46.2 
+## R version:       3.4.2 
+## Date of fit:     Thu Nov 16 17:12:48 2017 
+## Date of summary: Thu Nov 16 17:12:48 2017 
 ## 
 ## Equations:
 ## d_parent/dt = - (alpha/beta) * 1/((time/beta) + 1) * parent
 ## 
 ## Model predictions using solution type analytical 
 ## 
-## Fitted with method Port using 81 model solutions performed in 0.176 s
+## Fitted with method Port using 81 model solutions performed in 0.183 s
 ## 
 ## Weighting: none
 ## 
@@ -369,10 +362,10 @@ FOCUS_2006_L2_mkin <- main = "FOCUS L2 - DFOP")

 

 
summary(m.L2.DFOP, data = FALSE)

-
## mkin version:    0.9.46.1 
-## R version:       3.4.1 
-## Date of fit:     Thu Sep 14 12:15:07 2017 
-## Date of summary: Thu Sep 14 12:15:07 2017 
+
## mkin version:    0.9.46.2 
+## R version:       3.4.2 
+## Date of fit:     Thu Nov 16 17:12:49 2017 
+## Date of summary: Thu Nov 16 17:12:49 2017 
 ## 
 ## Equations:
 ## d_parent/dt = - ((k1 * g * exp(-k1 * time) + k2 * (1 - g) *
@@ -381,7 +374,7 @@ FOCUS_2006_L2_mkin <-  
summary(mm.L3[["DFOP", 1]])

-
## mkin version:    0.9.46.1 
-## R version:       3.4.1 
-## Date of fit:     Thu Sep 14 12:15:08 2017 
-## Date of summary: Thu Sep 14 12:15:08 2017 
+
## mkin version:    0.9.46.2 
+## R version:       3.4.2 
+## Date of fit:     Thu Nov 16 17:12:50 2017 
+## Date of summary: Thu Nov 16 17:12:50 2017 
 ## 
 ## Equations:
 ## d_parent/dt = - ((k1 * g * exp(-k1 * time) + k2 * (1 - g) *
@@ -473,7 +466,7 @@ mm.L3 <-  

 
The \(\chi^2\) error level of 3.3% as well as the plot suggest that the SFO model fits very well. The error level at which the \(\chi^2\) test passes is slightly lower for the FOMC model. However, the difference appears negligible.

 
summary(mm.L4[["SFO", 1]], data = FALSE)

-
## mkin version:    0.9.46.1 
-## R version:       3.4.1 
-## Date of fit:     Thu Sep 14 12:15:08 2017 
-## Date of summary: Thu Sep 14 12:15:09 2017 
+
## mkin version:    0.9.46.2 
+## R version:       3.4.2 
+## Date of fit:     Thu Nov 16 17:12:50 2017 
+## Date of summary: Thu Nov 16 17:12:51 2017 
 ## 
 ## Equations:
 ## d_parent/dt = - k_parent_sink * parent
@@ -622,17 +615,17 @@ mm.L4 <- 
summary(mm.L4[["FOMC", 1]], data = FALSE)

-
## mkin version:    0.9.46.1 
-## R version:       3.4.1 
-## Date of fit:     Thu Sep 14 12:15:08 2017 
-## Date of summary: Thu Sep 14 12:15:09 2017 
+
## mkin version:    0.9.46.2 
+## R version:       3.4.2 
+## Date of fit:     Thu Nov 16 17:12:51 2017 
+## Date of summary: Thu Nov 16 17:12:51 2017 
 ## 
 ## Equations:
 ## d_parent/dt = - (alpha/beta) * 1/((time/beta) + 1) * parent
 ## 
 ## Model predictions using solution type analytical 
 ## 
-## Fitted with method Port using 66 model solutions performed in 0.151 s
+## Fitted with method Port using 66 model solutions performed in 0.136 s
 ## 
 ## Weighting: none
 ## 
-- 
cgit v1.2.1