From 91c5db736a4d3f2290a0cc5698fb4e35ae7bda59 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Johannes Ranke Date: Wed, 18 May 2022 21:26:17 +0200 Subject: Remove outdated comment in FOCUS L vignette, update docs This also adds the first benchmark results obtained on my laptop system --- docs/reference/AIC.mmkin.html | 10 ++++++---- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) (limited to 'docs/reference/AIC.mmkin.html') diff --git a/docs/reference/AIC.mmkin.html b/docs/reference/AIC.mmkin.html index a049850d..c46824e6 100644 --- a/docs/reference/AIC.mmkin.html +++ b/docs/reference/AIC.mmkin.html @@ -123,6 +123,8 @@ dataframe if there are several fits in the column).

f <- mmkin(c("SFO", "FOMC", "DFOP"), list("FOCUS A" = FOCUS_2006_A, "FOCUS C" = FOCUS_2006_C), cores = 1, quiet = TRUE) +#> Warning: Optimisation did not converge: +#> false convergence (8) # We get a warning because the FOMC model does not converge for the # FOCUS A dataset, as it is well described by SFO @@ -136,17 +138,17 @@ dataframe if there are several fits in the column).

AIC(f[, "FOCUS A"]) #> df AIC #> SFO 3 55.28197 -#> FOMC 4 57.28222 +#> FOMC 4 57.28198 #> DFOP 5 59.28197 AIC(f[, "FOCUS A"], k = 0) # If we do not penalize additional parameters, we get nearly the same #> df AIC #> SFO 3 49.28197 -#> FOMC 4 49.28222 +#> FOMC 4 49.28198 #> DFOP 5 49.28197 BIC(f[, "FOCUS A"]) # Comparing the BIC gives a very similar picture #> df BIC #> SFO 3 55.52030 -#> FOMC 4 57.59999 +#> FOMC 4 57.59975 #> DFOP 5 59.67918 # For FOCUS C, the more complex models fit better @@ -176,7 +178,7 @@ dataframe if there are several fits in the column).

-

Site built with pkgdown 2.0.2.

+

Site built with pkgdown 2.0.3.

-- cgit v1.2.1