From 91c5db736a4d3f2290a0cc5698fb4e35ae7bda59 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Johannes Ranke
Date: Wed, 18 May 2022 21:26:17 +0200
Subject: Remove outdated comment in FOCUS L vignette, update docs
This also adds the first benchmark results obtained on my laptop system
---
docs/reference/AIC.mmkin.html | 10 ++++++----
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
(limited to 'docs/reference/AIC.mmkin.html')
diff --git a/docs/reference/AIC.mmkin.html b/docs/reference/AIC.mmkin.html
index a049850d..c46824e6 100644
--- a/docs/reference/AIC.mmkin.html
+++ b/docs/reference/AIC.mmkin.html
@@ -123,6 +123,8 @@ dataframe if there are several fits in the column).
f <- mmkin(c("SFO", "FOMC", "DFOP"),
list("FOCUS A" = FOCUS_2006_A,
"FOCUS C" = FOCUS_2006_C), cores = 1, quiet = TRUE)
+#> Warning: Optimisation did not converge:
+#> false convergence (8)
# We get a warning because the FOMC model does not converge for the
# FOCUS A dataset, as it is well described by SFO
@@ -136,17 +138,17 @@ dataframe if there are several fits in the column).
AIC(f[, "FOCUS A"])
#> df AIC
#> SFO 3 55.28197
-#> FOMC 4 57.28222
+#> FOMC 4 57.28198
#> DFOP 5 59.28197
AIC(f[, "FOCUS A"], k = 0) # If we do not penalize additional parameters, we get nearly the same
#> df AIC
#> SFO 3 49.28197
-#> FOMC 4 49.28222
+#> FOMC 4 49.28198
#> DFOP 5 49.28197
BIC(f[, "FOCUS A"]) # Comparing the BIC gives a very similar picture
#> df BIC
#> SFO 3 55.52030
-#> FOMC 4 57.59999
+#> FOMC 4 57.59975
#> DFOP 5 59.67918
# For FOCUS C, the more complex models fit better
@@ -176,7 +178,7 @@ dataframe if there are several fits in the column).
--
cgit v1.2.1