From 95178837d3f91e84837628446b5fd468179af2b9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Johannes Ranke
Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2019 15:09:28 +0200
Subject: Additional algorithm "d_c", more tests, docs
The new algorithm tries direct optimization of the likelihood, as well
as a three step procedure. In this way, we consistently get the
model with the highest likelihood for SFO, DFOP and HS for all 12
new test datasets.
---
docs/reference/experimental_data_for_UBA.html | 223 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 223 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 docs/reference/experimental_data_for_UBA.html
(limited to 'docs/reference/experimental_data_for_UBA.html')
diff --git a/docs/reference/experimental_data_for_UBA.html b/docs/reference/experimental_data_for_UBA.html
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..3e8d20ef
--- /dev/null
+++ b/docs/reference/experimental_data_for_UBA.html
@@ -0,0 +1,223 @@
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+Experimental datasets used for development and testing of error models — experimental_data_for_UBA_2019 • mkin
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Experimental datasets used for development and testing of error models
+
+
experimental_data_for_UBA.Rd
+
+
+
+
+
The 12 datasets were extracted from active substance evaluation dossiers published
+ by EFSA. Kinetic evaluations shown for these datasets are intended to illustrate
+ and advance error model specifications. The fact that these data and some
+ results are shown here do not imply a license to use them in the context of
+ pesticide registrations, as the use of the data may be constrained by
+ data protection regulations.
+
+
+
+
experimental_data_for_UBA_2019
+
+
Format
+
+
A list containing twelve datasets as an R6 class defined by mkinds,
+ each containing, among others, the following components
+
title
The name of the dataset, e.g. Soil 1
+
data
A data frame with the data in the form expected by mkinfit
+
+
+
Source
+
+
Ranke (2019) Documentation of results obtained for the error model expertise
+ written for the German Umweltbundesamt.
+
+
+
+
+
+
--
cgit v1.2.1
From b6027bbd157734e1c7f8c3ba6373451f5c85fc38 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Johannes Ranke
Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2019 15:16:59 +0200
Subject: Add error model algorithm to output
---
docs/reference/experimental_data_for_UBA.html | 66 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 64 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
(limited to 'docs/reference/experimental_data_for_UBA.html')
diff --git a/docs/reference/experimental_data_for_UBA.html b/docs/reference/experimental_data_for_UBA.html
index 3e8d20ef..bb94fd11 100644
--- a/docs/reference/experimental_data_for_UBA.html
+++ b/docs/reference/experimental_data_for_UBA.html
@@ -37,7 +37,30 @@
and advance error model specifications. The fact that these data and some
results are shown here do not imply a license to use them in the context of
pesticide registrations, as the use of the data may be constrained by
- data protection regulations." />
+ data protection regulations.
+Preprocessing of data was performed based on the recommendations of the FOCUS
+ kinetics workgroup (FOCUS, 2014) as described below.
+Datasets 1 and 2 are from the Renewal Assessment Report (RAR) for imazamox
+ (France, 2015, p. 15). For setting values reported as zero, an LOQ of 0.1
+ was assumed. Metabolite residues reported for day zero were added to the
+ parent compound residues.
+Datasets 3 and 4 are from the Renewal Assessment Report (RAR) for isofetamid
+ (Belgium, 2014, p. 8) and show the data for two different radiolabels. For
+ dataset 4, the value given for the metabolite in the day zero sampling
+ in replicate B was added to the parent compound, following the respective
+ FOCUS recommendation.
+Dataset 5 is from the Renewal Assessment Report (RAR) for ethofumesate
+ (Austria, 2015, p. 16).
+Datasets 6 to 10 are from the Renewal Assessment Report (RAR) for glyphosate
+ (Germany, 2013a, pages 8, 28, 50, 51). For the initial sampling,
+ the residues given for the metabolite were added to the parent
+ value, following the recommendation of the FOCUS kinetics workgroup.
+Dataset 11 is from the Renewal Assessment Report (RAR) for 2,4-D
+ (Germany, 2013b, p. 644). Values reported as zero were set to NA, with
+ the exception of the day three sampling of metabolite A2, which was set
+ to one half of the LOD reported to be 1% AR.
+Dataset 12 is from the Renewal Assessment Report (RAR) for thifensulfuron-methyl
+ (United Kingdom, 2014, p. 81)." />
@@ -139,6 +162,29 @@
results are shown here do not imply a license to use them in the context of
pesticide registrations, as the use of the data may be constrained by
data protection regulations.
+
Preprocessing of data was performed based on the recommendations of the FOCUS
+ kinetics workgroup (FOCUS, 2014) as described below.
+
Datasets 1 and 2 are from the Renewal Assessment Report (RAR) for imazamox
+ (France, 2015, p. 15). For setting values reported as zero, an LOQ of 0.1
+ was assumed. Metabolite residues reported for day zero were added to the
+ parent compound residues.
+
Datasets 3 and 4 are from the Renewal Assessment Report (RAR) for isofetamid
+ (Belgium, 2014, p. 8) and show the data for two different radiolabels. For
+ dataset 4, the value given for the metabolite in the day zero sampling
+ in replicate B was added to the parent compound, following the respective
+ FOCUS recommendation.
+
Dataset 5 is from the Renewal Assessment Report (RAR) for ethofumesate
+ (Austria, 2015, p. 16).
+
Datasets 6 to 10 are from the Renewal Assessment Report (RAR) for glyphosate
+ (Germany, 2013a, pages 8, 28, 50, 51). For the initial sampling,
+ the residues given for the metabolite were added to the parent
+ value, following the recommendation of the FOCUS kinetics workgroup.
+
Dataset 11 is from the Renewal Assessment Report (RAR) for 2,4-D
+ (Germany, 2013b, p. 644). Values reported as zero were set to NA, with
+ the exception of the day three sampling of metabolite A2, which was set
+ to one half of the LOD reported to be 1% AR.
+
Dataset 12 is from the Renewal Assessment Report (RAR) for thifensulfuron-methyl
+ (United Kingdom, 2014, p. 81).
@@ -154,8 +200,24 @@
Source
-
Ranke (2019) Documentation of results obtained for the error model expertise
+
+
FOCUS (2014) “Generic guidance for Estimating Persistence and
+ Degradation Kinetics from Environmental Fate Studies on Pesticides in EU
+ Registration” Report of the FOCUS Work Group on Degradation Kinetics,
+ Version 1.1, 18 December 2014
+ http://esdac.jrc.ec.europa.eu/projects/degradation-kinetics
Germany (2013b). Renewal Assessment Report 2,4-D Volume 3 Annex B.8: Fate and behaviour in the
+ environment
+
Ranke (2019) Documentation of results obtained for the error model expertise
written for the German Umweltbundesamt.
+
United Kingdom (2014). Thifensulfuron-methyl - Annex B.8 (Volume 3) to the Report and Proposed
+ Decision of the United Kingdom made to the European Commission under Regulation (EC) No.
+ 1141/2010 for renewal of an active substance