From e5d1df9a9b1f0951d7dfbaf24eee4294470b73e2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Johannes Ranke
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2022 14:54:20 +0100
Subject: Complete update of online docs for v1.2.0
---
docs/reference/intervals.saem.mmkin.html | 29 ++++++++++++++++++++++-------
1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
(limited to 'docs/reference/intervals.saem.mmkin.html')
diff --git a/docs/reference/intervals.saem.mmkin.html b/docs/reference/intervals.saem.mmkin.html
index ae621adc..1547f3af 100644
--- a/docs/reference/intervals.saem.mmkin.html
+++ b/docs/reference/intervals.saem.mmkin.html
@@ -17,7 +17,7 @@
mkin
- 1.1.0
+ 1.2.0
@@ -44,11 +44,14 @@
Example evaluations of dimethenamid data from 2018 with nonlinear mixed-effects models
- Example evaluation of FOCUS Example Dataset Z
+ Short demo of the multistart method
Performance benefit by using compiled model definitions in mkin
+
+ Example evaluation of FOCUS Example Dataset Z
+
Calculation of time weighted average concentrations with mkin
@@ -56,7 +59,10 @@
Example evaluation of NAFTA SOP Attachment examples
- Some benchmark timings
+ Benchmark timings for mkin
+
+
+ Benchmark timings for saem.mmkin
@@ -87,27 +93,36 @@
-
# S3 method for saem.mmkin
-intervals(object, level = 0.95, backtransform = TRUE, ...)
+
# S3 method for saem.mmkin
+intervals(object, level = 0.95, backtransform = TRUE, ...)
Arguments
- object
The fitted saem.mmkin object
+
+
- level
The confidence level. Must be the default of 0.95 as this is what
is available in the saemix object
+
+
- backtransform
In case the model was fitted with mkin transformations,
should we backtransform the parameters where a one to one correlation
between transformed and backtransformed parameters exists?
+
+
- ...
For compatibility with the generic method
+
Value
-
An object with 'intervals.saem.mmkin' and 'intervals.lme' in the
+
+
+
An object with 'intervals.saem.mmkin' and 'intervals.lme' in the
class attribute
@@ -123,7 +138,7 @@ class attribute
--
cgit v1.2.3