From 6441a9f35d66f2c4d38c0036f99cd8f509d76f3b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Johannes Ranke Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2020 21:24:13 +0100 Subject: More work on f_time_norm_focus --- man/f_time_norm_focus.Rd | 21 ++++++++++++++------- 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) (limited to 'man/f_time_norm_focus.Rd') diff --git a/man/f_time_norm_focus.Rd b/man/f_time_norm_focus.Rd index 9d858312..bc7faa6a 100644 --- a/man/f_time_norm_focus.Rd +++ b/man/f_time_norm_focus.Rd @@ -19,7 +19,14 @@ f_time_norm_focus(object, ...) ... ) -\method{f_time_norm_focus}{mkindsg}(object, Q10 = 2.58, walker = 0.7, f_na = NA, ...) +\method{f_time_norm_focus}{mkindsg}( + object, + study_moisture_ref_source = c("meta", "focus"), + Q10 = 2.58, + walker = 0.7, + f_na = NA, + ... +) } \arguments{ \item{object}{An object containing information used for the calculations} @@ -39,21 +46,21 @@ f_time_norm_focus(object, ...) \item{f_na}{The factor to use for NA values. If set to NA, only factors for complete cases will be returned.} + +\item{study_moisture_ref_source}{Source for the reference value +used to calculate the study moisture} } \description{ Time step normalisation factors for aerobic soil degradation as described in Appendix 8 to the FOCUS kinetics guidance (FOCUS 2014, p. 369). } \examples{ -f_time_norm_focus(25, 20, 25) # 1.37, compare p. 184 +f_time_norm_focus(25, 20, 25) # 1.37, compare FOCUS 2014 p. 184 D24_2014$meta # No moisture normalisation in the first dataset, so we use f_na = 1 to get -# Temperature only normalisation as in the EU evaluation -f_time_norm_focus(D24_2014, f_na = 1) -# Moisture normalisation for the other four soils is one, as soil moisture -# is higher than the approximate field capacity derived from the USDA soil -# type +# temperature only normalisation as in the EU evaluation +f_time_norm_focus(D24_2014, study_moisture_ref_source = "focus", f_na = 1) } \references{ FOCUS (2006) \dQuote{Guidance Document on Estimating Persistence -- cgit v1.2.1