From 7035cde3a53781721fe15a8893fdf328c789bdd2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Johannes Ranke Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2022 12:03:40 +0100 Subject: Remove nlmixr interface for release of mkin 1.1.0 I am postponing my attempts to get the nlmixr interface to CRAN, given some problems with nlmixr using R-devel under Windows, see https://github.com/nlmixrdevelopment/nlmixr/issues/596 and https://github.com/r-hub/rhub/issues/512, which is fixed by the removal of nlmixr from the testsuite. For the tests to be more platform independent, the biphasic mixed effects models test dataset was defined in a way that fitting should be more robust (less ill-defined). --- man/intervals.nlmixr.mmkin.Rd | 25 ------------------------- 1 file changed, 25 deletions(-) delete mode 100644 man/intervals.nlmixr.mmkin.Rd (limited to 'man/intervals.nlmixr.mmkin.Rd') diff --git a/man/intervals.nlmixr.mmkin.Rd b/man/intervals.nlmixr.mmkin.Rd deleted file mode 100644 index e6da8901..00000000 --- a/man/intervals.nlmixr.mmkin.Rd +++ /dev/null @@ -1,25 +0,0 @@ -% Generated by roxygen2: do not edit by hand -% Please edit documentation in R/intervals.R -\name{intervals.nlmixr.mmkin} -\alias{intervals.nlmixr.mmkin} -\title{Confidence intervals for parameters in nlmixr.mmkin objects} -\usage{ -\method{intervals}{nlmixr.mmkin}(object, level = 0.95, backtransform = TRUE, ...) -} -\arguments{ -\item{object}{The fitted saem.mmkin object} - -\item{level}{The confidence level.} - -\item{backtransform}{Should we backtransform the parameters where a one to -one correlation between transformed and backtransformed parameters exists?} - -\item{\dots}{For compatibility with the generic method} -} -\value{ -An object with 'intervals.saem.mmkin' and 'intervals.lme' in the -class attribute -} -\description{ -Confidence intervals for parameters in nlmixr.mmkin objects -} -- cgit v1.2.1