From 2728910b96f0ec7dd7ccd97fc6c1f6677e5e352d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Johannes Ranke Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2022 10:42:07 +0100 Subject: Test saemix without special analytical solutions Also increase the performance a bit (from about 210 s to about 140 s in the case of DFOP with four chains and 300, 100 iterations). --- test.log | 32 ++++++++++++++++---------------- 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-) (limited to 'test.log') diff --git a/test.log b/test.log index 4c273c19..2fc6a43c 100644 --- a/test.log +++ b/test.log @@ -3,18 +3,18 @@ Loading required package: parallel ℹ Testing mkin ✔ | F W S OK | Context ✔ | 5 | AIC calculation -✔ | 5 | Analytical solutions for coupled models [3.4s] +✔ | 5 | Analytical solutions for coupled models [3.3s] ✔ | 5 | Calculation of Akaike weights ✔ | 3 | Export dataset for reading into CAKE ✔ | 12 | Confidence intervals and p-values [1.0s] -✔ | 1 12 | Dimethenamid data from 2018 [32.7s] +✔ | 1 12 | Dimethenamid data from 2018 [31.0s] ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── Skip (test_dmta.R:98:3): Different backends get consistent results for SFO-SFO3+, dimethenamid data Reason: Fitting this ODE model with saemix takes about 15 minutes on my system ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── -✔ | 14 | Error model fitting [5.0s] +✔ | 14 | Error model fitting [4.6s] ✔ | 5 | Time step normalisation -✔ | 4 | Calculation of FOCUS chi2 error levels [0.6s] +✔ | 4 | Calculation of FOCUS chi2 error levels [0.5s] ✔ | 14 | Results for FOCUS D established in expertise for UBA (Ranke 2014) [0.8s] ✔ | 4 | Test fitting the decline of metabolites from their maximum [0.3s] ✔ | 1 | Fitting the logistic model [0.2s] @@ -24,28 +24,28 @@ Skip (test_mixed.R:68:3): saemix results are reproducible for biphasic fits Reason: Fitting with saemix takes around 10 minutes when using deSolve ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── ✔ | 3 | Test dataset classes mkinds and mkindsg -✔ | 10 | Special cases of mkinfit calls [0.5s] -✔ | 3 | mkinfit features [0.7s] -✔ | 8 | mkinmod model generation and printing [0.3s] -✔ | 3 | Model predictions with mkinpredict [0.4s] -✔ | 16 | Evaluations according to 2015 NAFTA guidance [1.6s] -✔ | 9 | Nonlinear mixed-effects models with nlme [8.6s] -✔ | 16 | Plotting [10.4s] +✔ | 10 | Special cases of mkinfit calls [0.4s] +✔ | 3 | mkinfit features [0.6s] +✔ | 8 | mkinmod model generation and printing [0.2s] +✔ | 3 | Model predictions with mkinpredict [0.3s] +✔ | 16 | Evaluations according to 2015 NAFTA guidance [1.4s] +✔ | 9 | Nonlinear mixed-effects models with nlme [8.0s] +✔ | 16 | Plotting [9.9s] ✔ | 4 | Residuals extracted from mkinfit models -✔ | 23 | saemix parent models [28.0s] +✔ | 25 | saemix parent models [170.8s] ✔ | 2 | Complex test case from Schaefer et al. (2007) Piacenza paper [1.4s] -✔ | 7 | Fitting the SFORB model [3.7s] +✔ | 7 | Fitting the SFORB model [3.6s] ✔ | 1 | Summaries of old mkinfit objects ✔ | 4 | Summary [0.1s] ✔ | 4 | Results for synthetic data established in expertise for UBA (Ranke 2014) [2.2s] -✔ | 9 | Hypothesis tests [8.1s] +✔ | 9 | Hypothesis tests [8.0s] ✔ | 4 | Calculation of maximum time weighted average concentrations (TWAs) [2.2s] ══ Results ═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════ -Duration: 112.8 s +Duration: 251.5 s ── Skipped tests ────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── • Fitting this ODE model with saemix takes about 15 minutes on my system (1) • Fitting with saemix takes around 10 minutes when using deSolve (1) -[ FAIL 0 | WARN 0 | SKIP 2 | PASS 222 ] +[ FAIL 0 | WARN 0 | SKIP 2 | PASS 224 ] -- cgit v1.2.1