From 48c463680b51fa767b4cd7bd62865f192d0354ac Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Johannes Ranke Date: Sat, 6 Feb 2021 18:30:32 +0100 Subject: Reintroduce interface to saemix Also after the upgrade from buster to bullseye of my local system, some test results for saemix have changed. --- tests/testthat/test_plot.R | 11 +++++++++++ 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+) (limited to 'tests/testthat/test_plot.R') diff --git a/tests/testthat/test_plot.R b/tests/testthat/test_plot.R index 0bf3ee66..1c95d069 100644 --- a/tests/testthat/test_plot.R +++ b/tests/testthat/test_plot.R @@ -35,6 +35,11 @@ test_that("Plotting mkinfit, mmkin and mixed model objects is reproducible", { plot_biphasic_mmkin <- function() plot(f_uba_dfop_sfo_mixed) vdiffr::expect_doppelganger("mixed model fit for mmkin object", plot_biphasic_mmkin) + if (saemix_available) { + plot_biphasic_saem_s <- function() plot(f_uba_dfop_sfo_saem) + vdiffr::expect_doppelganger("mixed model fit for saem object with saemix transformations", plot_biphasic_saem_s) + } + skip_on_travis() plot_biphasic_nlme <- function() plot(dfop_nlme_1) @@ -43,6 +48,12 @@ test_that("Plotting mkinfit, mmkin and mixed model objects is reproducible", { #plot_biphasic_mmkin <- function() plot(mixed(mmkin_biphasic)) # Biphasic fits with lots of data and fits have lots of potential for differences plot_biphasic_nlme <- function() plot(nlme_biphasic) + if (saemix_available) { + #plot_biphasic_saem_s <- function() plot(saem_biphasic_s) + plot_biphasic_saem_m <- function() plot(saem_biphasic_m) + + vdiffr::expect_doppelganger("mixed model fit for saem object with mkin transformations", plot_biphasic_saem_m) + } # different results when working with eigenvalues plot_errmod_fit_D_obs_eigen <- function() plot_err(fit_D_obs_eigen, sep_obs = FALSE) -- cgit v1.2.1