From f0ef23a7598e5d19648ae4edc2b74e0fba27a41c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Johannes Ranke Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2021 16:41:31 +0100 Subject: Prepare for v1.0.0 - Improve authorship and copyright information - Prepare pkgdown config - Remove dependence on saemix as we need the development version which is not ready for CRAN - Temporarily remove saemix interface to check code coverage of the rest --- tests/testthat/test_plot.R | 11 ----------- 1 file changed, 11 deletions(-) (limited to 'tests/testthat/test_plot.R') diff --git a/tests/testthat/test_plot.R b/tests/testthat/test_plot.R index 1c95d069..0bf3ee66 100644 --- a/tests/testthat/test_plot.R +++ b/tests/testthat/test_plot.R @@ -35,11 +35,6 @@ test_that("Plotting mkinfit, mmkin and mixed model objects is reproducible", { plot_biphasic_mmkin <- function() plot(f_uba_dfop_sfo_mixed) vdiffr::expect_doppelganger("mixed model fit for mmkin object", plot_biphasic_mmkin) - if (saemix_available) { - plot_biphasic_saem_s <- function() plot(f_uba_dfop_sfo_saem) - vdiffr::expect_doppelganger("mixed model fit for saem object with saemix transformations", plot_biphasic_saem_s) - } - skip_on_travis() plot_biphasic_nlme <- function() plot(dfop_nlme_1) @@ -48,12 +43,6 @@ test_that("Plotting mkinfit, mmkin and mixed model objects is reproducible", { #plot_biphasic_mmkin <- function() plot(mixed(mmkin_biphasic)) # Biphasic fits with lots of data and fits have lots of potential for differences plot_biphasic_nlme <- function() plot(nlme_biphasic) - if (saemix_available) { - #plot_biphasic_saem_s <- function() plot(saem_biphasic_s) - plot_biphasic_saem_m <- function() plot(saem_biphasic_m) - - vdiffr::expect_doppelganger("mixed model fit for saem object with mkin transformations", plot_biphasic_saem_m) - } # different results when working with eigenvalues plot_errmod_fit_D_obs_eigen <- function() plot_err(fit_D_obs_eigen, sep_obs = FALSE) -- cgit v1.2.1