From 91c5db736a4d3f2290a0cc5698fb4e35ae7bda59 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Johannes Ranke <jranke@uni-bremen.de>
Date: Wed, 18 May 2022 21:26:17 +0200
Subject: Remove outdated comment in FOCUS L vignette, update docs

This also adds the first benchmark results obtained on my laptop system
---
 vignettes/FOCUS_L.rmd | 4 +---
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)

(limited to 'vignettes/FOCUS_L.rmd')

diff --git a/vignettes/FOCUS_L.rmd b/vignettes/FOCUS_L.rmd
index 96239051..6871760c 100644
--- a/vignettes/FOCUS_L.rmd
+++ b/vignettes/FOCUS_L.rmd
@@ -175,9 +175,7 @@ summary(m.L2.DFOP, data = FALSE)
 ```
 
 Here, the DFOP model is clearly the best-fit model for dataset L2 based on the
-chi^2 error level criterion. However, the failure to calculate the covariance
-matrix indicates that the parameter estimates correlate excessively. Therefore,
-the FOMC model may be preferred for this dataset.
+chi^2 error level criterion.
 
 # Laboratory Data L3
 
-- 
cgit v1.2.1

