From 415ca2bea5d5c3815bd9f8fa1566cec5bb3fc775 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Johannes Ranke Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2015 08:52:01 +0100 Subject: Re-add the compiled models vignette This was accidentally deleted in 438a889c37ffdf8f0c6585092da6abdb63b4575e on June 30! --- vignettes/compiled_models.Rmd | 101 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 101 insertions(+) create mode 100644 vignettes/compiled_models.Rmd (limited to 'vignettes') diff --git a/vignettes/compiled_models.Rmd b/vignettes/compiled_models.Rmd new file mode 100644 index 00000000..8dc74692 --- /dev/null +++ b/vignettes/compiled_models.Rmd @@ -0,0 +1,101 @@ +--- +title: "Performance benefit by using compiled model definitions in mkin" +author: "Johannes Ranke" +date: "`r Sys.Date()`" +output: + html_document: + css: mkin_vignettes.css + toc: true + mathjax: null + theme: united +vignette: > + %\VignetteIndexEntry{Performance benefit by using compiled model definitions in mkin} + %\VignetteEngine{knitr::rmarkdown} + \usepackage[utf8]{inputenc} +--- + +```{r, include = FALSE} +library(knitr) +opts_chunk$set(tidy = FALSE, cache = TRUE) +``` + +## Benchmark for a model that can also be solved with Eigenvalues + +This evaluation is taken from the example section of mkinfit. When using an mkin version +equal to or greater than 0.9-36 and a C compiler (gcc) is available, you will see +a message that the model is being compiled from autogenerated C code when +defining a model using mkinmod. The `mkinmod()` function checks for presence of +the gcc compiler using + +```{r check_gcc} +Sys.which("gcc") +``` +First, we build a simple degradation model for a parent compound with one metabolite. + +```{r create_SFO_SFO} +library("mkin") +SFO_SFO <- mkinmod( + parent = mkinsub("SFO", "m1"), + m1 = mkinsub("SFO")) +``` + +We can compare the performance of the Eigenvalue based solution against the +compiled version and the R implementation of the differential equations using +the microbenchmark package. + + +```{r benchmark_SFO_SFO} +library("microbenchmark") +mb.1 <- microbenchmark( + mkinfit(SFO_SFO, FOCUS_2006_D, solution_type = "deSolve", use_compiled = FALSE, + quiet = TRUE), + mkinfit(SFO_SFO, FOCUS_2006_D, solution_type = "eigen", quiet = TRUE), + mkinfit(SFO_SFO, FOCUS_2006_D, solution_type = "deSolve", quiet = TRUE), + times = 3, control = list(warmup = 1)) +smb.1 <- summary(mb.1)[-1] +rownames(smb.1) <- c("deSolve, not compiled", "Eigenvalue based", "deSolve, compiled") +print(smb.1) +``` + +We see that using the compiled model is by a factor of +`r round(smb.1["deSolve, not compiled", "median"]/smb.1["deSolve, compiled", "median"], 1)` +faster than using the R version with the default ode solver, and it is even +faster than the Eigenvalue based solution implemented in R which does not need +iterative solution of the ODEs: + +```{r} +smb.1["median"]/smb.1["deSolve, compiled", "median"] +``` + +## Benchmark for a model that can not be solved with Eigenvalues + +This evaluation is also taken from the example section of mkinfit. + +```{r benchmark_FOMC_SFO} +FOMC_SFO <- mkinmod( + parent = mkinsub("FOMC", "m1"), + m1 = mkinsub( "SFO")) + +mb.2 <- microbenchmark( + mkinfit(FOMC_SFO, FOCUS_2006_D, use_compiled = FALSE, quiet = TRUE), + mkinfit(FOMC_SFO, FOCUS_2006_D, quiet = TRUE), + times = 3, control = list(warmup = 1)) +smb.2 <- summary(mb.2)[-1] +rownames(smb.2) <- c("deSolve, not compiled", "deSolve, compiled") +print(smb.2) +smb.2["median"]/smb.2["deSolve, compiled", "median"] +``` + +Here we get a performance benefit of a factor of +`r round(smb.2["deSolve, not compiled", "median"]/smb.2["deSolve, compiled", "median"], 1)` +using the version of the differential equation model compiled from C code using +the inline package! + +This vignette was built with mkin `r packageVersion("mkin")` on + +```{r sessionInfo, echo = FALSE} +cat(capture.output(sessionInfo())[1:3], sep = "\n") +if(!inherits(try(cpuinfo <- readLines("/proc/cpuinfo")), "try-error")) { + cat(gsub("model name\t: ", "CPU model: ", cpuinfo[grep("model name", cpuinfo)[1]])) +} +``` -- cgit v1.2.1