From 59ce61be534c2e80704a8eb37973b66cc24f55b4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Johannes Ranke <jranke@uni-bremen.de>
Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2014 18:17:49 +0200
Subject: Comment using the additional DT50 values at least once

---
 vignettes/FOCUS_Z.Rnw | 10 ++++++++--
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

(limited to 'vignettes')

diff --git a/vignettes/FOCUS_Z.Rnw b/vignettes/FOCUS_Z.Rnw
index aff49e69..62d8729a 100644
--- a/vignettes/FOCUS_Z.Rnw
+++ b/vignettes/FOCUS_Z.Rnw
@@ -287,8 +287,14 @@ A graphical representation of the confidence intervals can finally be obtained.
 mkinparplot(m.Z.mkin.5a)
 @
 
-It is clear that nothing can be said about the degradation rate of Z3 towards
-the end of the experiment. However, this appears to be a feature of the data.
+The endpoints obtained with this model are
+<<FOCUS_2006_Z_fits_11b_endpoints, echo=TRUE>>=
+endpoints(m.Z.mkin.5a)
+@
+
+It is clear the degradation rate of Z3 towards the end of the experiment 
+is very low as DT50\_b2 is reported to be infinity.  However, this appears to
+be a feature of the data.
 
 <<FOCUS_2006_Z_residuals_11>>=
 par(mfrow = c(2, 2))
-- 
cgit v1.2.1