This evaluation is taken from the example section of mkinfit. When using an mkin version equal to or greater than 0.9-36 and a C compiler (gcc) is available, you will see a message that the model is being compiled from autogenerated C code when defining a model using mkinmod. The mkinmod() function checks for presence of the gcc compiler using
Sys.which("gcc")##            gcc 
## "/usr/bin/gcc"First, we build a simple degradation model for a parent compound with one metabolite.
## Successfully compiled differential equation model from auto-generated C code.We can compare the performance of the Eigenvalue based solution against the compiled version and the R implementation of the differential equations using the microbenchmark package.
library("microbenchmark")
library("ggplot2")
mb.1 <- microbenchmark(
  "deSolve, not compiled" = mkinfit(SFO_SFO, FOCUS_2006_D, 
                                    solution_type = "deSolve", 
                                    use_compiled = FALSE, quiet = TRUE),
  "Eigenvalue based" = mkinfit(SFO_SFO, FOCUS_2006_D, 
                               solution_type = "eigen", quiet = TRUE),
  "deSolve, compiled" = mkinfit(SFO_SFO, FOCUS_2006_D, 
                                solution_type = "deSolve", quiet = TRUE),
  times = 3, control = list(warmup = 0))## Warning in microbenchmark(`deSolve, not compiled` = mkinfit(SFO_SFO,
## FOCUS_2006_D, : Could not measure overhead. Your clock might lack
## precision.smb.1 <- summary(mb.1)
print(mb.1)## Unit: milliseconds
##                   expr       min        lq      mean    median        uq
##  deSolve, not compiled 6407.0333 6420.1971 6434.6510 6433.3609 6448.4598
##       Eigenvalue based  887.4338  891.8401  906.9270  896.2463  916.6735
##      deSolve, compiled  720.2433  727.8793  733.2019  735.5152  739.6812
##        max neval cld
##  6463.5587     3   c
##   937.1007     3  b 
##   743.8472     3 aautoplot(mb.1)
We see that using the compiled model is by a factor of 8.7 faster than using the R version with the default ode solver, and it is even faster than the Eigenvalue based solution implemented in R which does not need iterative solution of the ODEs:
rownames(smb.1) <- smb.1$expr
smb.1["median"]/smb.1["deSolve, compiled", "median"]##                         median
## deSolve, not compiled 8.746741
## Eigenvalue based      1.218529
## deSolve, compiled     1.000000This evaluation is also taken from the example section of mkinfit.
## Successfully compiled differential equation model from auto-generated C code.mb.2 <- microbenchmark(
  "deSolve, not compiled" = mkinfit(FOMC_SFO, FOCUS_2006_D, 
                                    use_compiled = FALSE, quiet = TRUE),
  "deSolve, compiled" = mkinfit(FOMC_SFO, FOCUS_2006_D, quiet = TRUE),
  times = 3, control = list(warmup = 0))## Warning in microbenchmark(`deSolve, not compiled` = mkinfit(FOMC_SFO,
## FOCUS_2006_D, : Could not measure overhead. Your clock might lack
## precision.smb.2 <- summary(mb.2)
print(mb.2)## Unit: seconds
##                   expr       min       lq      mean    median        uq
##  deSolve, not compiled 13.501761 13.52142 13.697021 13.541086 13.794651
##      deSolve, compiled  1.359921  1.35996  1.366796  1.359999  1.370233
##        max neval cld
##  14.048217     3   b
##   1.380468     3  asmb.2["median"]/smb.2["deSolve, compiled", "median"]##   median
## 1     NA
## 2     NAautoplot(mb.2)
Here we get a performance benefit of a factor of 10 using the version of the differential equation model compiled from C code!
This vignette was built with mkin 0.9.44.9000 on
## R version 3.3.1 (2016-06-21)
## Platform: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu (64-bit)
## Running under: Debian GNU/Linux 8 (jessie)## CPU model: Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-4710MQ CPU @ 2.50GHz