1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
|
% Generated by roxygen2: do not edit by hand
% Please edit documentation in R/AIC.mmkin.R
\name{AIC.mmkin}
\alias{AIC.mmkin}
\alias{BIC.mmkin}
\title{Calculate the AIC for a column of an mmkin object}
\usage{
\method{AIC}{mmkin}(object, ..., k = 2)
\method{BIC}{mmkin}(object, ...)
}
\arguments{
\item{object}{An object of class \code{\link{mmkin}}, containing only one
column.}
\item{\dots}{For compatibility with the generic method}
\item{k}{As in the generic method}
}
\value{
As in the generic method (a numeric value for single fits, or a
dataframe if there are several fits in the column).
}
\description{
Provides a convenient way to compare different kinetic models fitted to the
same dataset.
}
\examples{
\dontrun{ # skip, as it takes > 10 s on winbuilder
f <- mmkin(c("SFO", "FOMC", "DFOP"),
list("FOCUS A" = FOCUS_2006_A,
"FOCUS C" = FOCUS_2006_C), cores = 1, quiet = TRUE)
# We get a warning because the FOMC model does not converge for the
# FOCUS A dataset, as it is well described by SFO
AIC(f["SFO", "FOCUS A"]) # We get a single number for a single fit
AIC(f[["SFO", "FOCUS A"]]) # or when extracting an mkinfit object
# For FOCUS A, the models fit almost equally well, so the higher the number
# of parameters, the higher (worse) the AIC
AIC(f[, "FOCUS A"])
AIC(f[, "FOCUS A"], k = 0) # If we do not penalize additional parameters, we get nearly the same
BIC(f[, "FOCUS A"]) # Comparing the BIC gives a very similar picture
# For FOCUS C, the more complex models fit better
AIC(f[, "FOCUS C"])
BIC(f[, "FOCUS C"])
}
}
\author{
Johannes Ranke
}
|
