blob: 77981c86cf2a6aa680183584124beec2e095aea6 (
plain) (
blame)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
|
Loading mkin
Testing mkin
✔ | OK F W S | Context
⠏ | 0 | Export dataset for reading into CAKE
⠋ | 1 | Export dataset for reading into CAKE
⠙ | 1 1 | Export dataset for reading into CAKE
✖ | 1 1 | Export dataset for reading into CAKE
────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
test_CAKE_export.R:32: error: Test data from Appendix D are correctly evaluated
Objekt 'MRID_555555' nicht gefunden
1: expect_message(res <- nafta(MRID_555555, "MRID 555555")) at /home/jranke/git/mkin/tests/testthat/test_CAKE_export.R:32
2: quasi_capture(enquo(object), capture_messages, label = label)
3: capture(act$val <- eval_bare(get_expr(quo), get_env(quo)))
4: withCallingHandlers(code, message = function(condition) {
out$push(condition)
invokeRestart("muffleMessage")
})
5: eval_bare(get_expr(quo), get_env(quo))
6: nafta(MRID_555555, "MRID 555555")
7: levels(ds$name) at /home/jranke/git/mkin/R/nafta.R:20
────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
⠏ | 0 | Calculation of FOCUS chi2 error levels
⠋ | 1 | Calculation of FOCUS chi2 error levels
⠙ | 2 | Calculation of FOCUS chi2 error levels
✔ | 2 | Calculation of FOCUS chi2 error levels [2.3 s]
⠏ | 0 | Results for FOCUS D established in expertise for UBA (Ranke 2014)
⠋ | 1 | Results for FOCUS D established in expertise for UBA (Ranke 2014)
⠙ | 2 | Results for FOCUS D established in expertise for UBA (Ranke 2014)
⠹ | 3 | Results for FOCUS D established in expertise for UBA (Ranke 2014)
⠸ | 4 | Results for FOCUS D established in expertise for UBA (Ranke 2014)
⠼ | 5 | Results for FOCUS D established in expertise for UBA (Ranke 2014)
⠴ | 6 | Results for FOCUS D established in expertise for UBA (Ranke 2014)
⠦ | 7 | Results for FOCUS D established in expertise for UBA (Ranke 2014)
⠧ | 8 | Results for FOCUS D established in expertise for UBA (Ranke 2014)
⠇ | 9 | Results for FOCUS D established in expertise for UBA (Ranke 2014)
⠏ | 10 | Results for FOCUS D established in expertise for UBA (Ranke 2014)
⠋ | 11 | Results for FOCUS D established in expertise for UBA (Ranke 2014)
⠙ | 12 | Results for FOCUS D established in expertise for UBA (Ranke 2014)
⠹ | 13 | Results for FOCUS D established in expertise for UBA (Ranke 2014)
⠸ | 14 | Results for FOCUS D established in expertise for UBA (Ranke 2014)
✔ | 14 | Results for FOCUS D established in expertise for UBA (Ranke 2014) [7.9 s]
⠏ | 0 | Iteratively reweighted least squares (IRLS) fitting
⠋ | 1 | Iteratively reweighted least squares (IRLS) fitting
⠙ | 2 | Iteratively reweighted least squares (IRLS) fitting
⠹ | 2 1 | Iteratively reweighted least squares (IRLS) fitting
✔ | 2 1 | Iteratively reweighted least squares (IRLS) fitting [16.0 s]
────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
test_irls.R:48: skip: Reweighting method 'tc' works
Too much trouble with datasets that are randomly generated
────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
⠏ | 0 | Fitting the logistic model
⠋ | 1 | Fitting the logistic model
⠙ | 1 1 | Fitting the logistic model
✔ | 1 1 | Fitting the logistic model [0.5 s]
────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
test_logistic.R:41: skip: The logistic fit can be done via differential equation
Skip slow fit of logistic model using deSolve without compilation
────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
⠏ | 0 | Model predictions with mkinpredict
⠋ | 1 | Model predictions with mkinpredict
⠙ | 2 | Model predictions with mkinpredict
⠹ | 3 | Model predictions with mkinpredict
✔ | 3 | Model predictions with mkinpredict [0.3 s]
⠏ | 0 | Evaluations according to 2015 NAFTA guidance
⠋ | 1 | Evaluations according to 2015 NAFTA guidance
⠙ | 2 | Evaluations according to 2015 NAFTA guidance
⠹ | 3 | Evaluations according to 2015 NAFTA guidance
⠸ | 4 | Evaluations according to 2015 NAFTA guidance
⠼ | 5 | Evaluations according to 2015 NAFTA guidance
⠴ | 6 | Evaluations according to 2015 NAFTA guidance
⠦ | 7 | Evaluations according to 2015 NAFTA guidance
⠧ | 8 | Evaluations according to 2015 NAFTA guidance
⠇ | 9 | Evaluations according to 2015 NAFTA guidance
⠏ | 9 1 | Evaluations according to 2015 NAFTA guidance
⠏ | 10 | Evaluations according to 2015 NAFTA guidance
⠋ | 11 | Evaluations according to 2015 NAFTA guidance
⠙ | 12 | Evaluations according to 2015 NAFTA guidance
⠹ | 13 | Evaluations according to 2015 NAFTA guidance
⠸ | 14 | Evaluations according to 2015 NAFTA guidance
⠼ | 15 | Evaluations according to 2015 NAFTA guidance
⠴ | 16 | Evaluations according to 2015 NAFTA guidance
⠦ | 17 | Evaluations according to 2015 NAFTA guidance
✔ | 17 | Evaluations according to 2015 NAFTA guidance [1.5 s]
⠏ | 0 | Fitting of parent only models
⠋ | 1 | Fitting of parent only models
⠙ | 2 | Fitting of parent only models
⠹ | 3 | Fitting of parent only models
⠸ | 4 | Fitting of parent only models
⠼ | 5 | Fitting of parent only models
⠴ | 6 | Fitting of parent only models
⠦ | 7 | Fitting of parent only models
⠧ | 8 | Fitting of parent only models
⠇ | 9 | Fitting of parent only models
⠏ | 10 | Fitting of parent only models
⠋ | 11 | Fitting of parent only models
⠙ | 12 | Fitting of parent only models
⠹ | 13 | Fitting of parent only models
⠸ | 14 | Fitting of parent only models
⠼ | 15 | Fitting of parent only models
⠴ | 16 | Fitting of parent only models
⠦ | 17 | Fitting of parent only models
⠧ | 18 | Fitting of parent only models
⠇ | 19 | Fitting of parent only models
⠏ | 20 | Fitting of parent only models
⠋ | 21 | Fitting of parent only models
✔ | 21 | Fitting of parent only models [24.5 s]
⠏ | 0 | Calculation of maximum time weighted average concentrations (TWAs)
⠋ | 1 | Calculation of maximum time weighted average concentrations (TWAs)
⠙ | 2 | Calculation of maximum time weighted average concentrations (TWAs)
⠹ | 3 | Calculation of maximum time weighted average concentrations (TWAs)
⠸ | 4 | Calculation of maximum time weighted average concentrations (TWAs)
⠼ | 5 | Calculation of maximum time weighted average concentrations (TWAs)
⠴ | 6 | Calculation of maximum time weighted average concentrations (TWAs)
⠦ | 7 | Calculation of maximum time weighted average concentrations (TWAs)
⠧ | 8 | Calculation of maximum time weighted average concentrations (TWAs)
✔ | 8 | Calculation of maximum time weighted average concentrations (TWAs) [7.3 s]
⠏ | 0 | Summary
⠋ | 1 | Summary
✔ | 1 | Summary
⠏ | 0 | Plotting
⠋ | 1 | Plotting
⠙ | 1 1 | Plotting
⠹ | 2 1 | Plotting
⠸ | 3 1 | Plotting
✔ | 3 1 | Plotting [0.3 s]
────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
test_plots_summary_twa.R:76: skip: Plotting mmkin objects is reproducible
Figure not generated yet: mkinparplot-for-focus-c-sfo.svg
Please run `vdiffr::manage_cases()` to validate the figure.
────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
⠏ | 0 | Complex test case from Schaefer et al. (2007) Piacenza paper
⠋ | 1 | Complex test case from Schaefer et al. (2007) Piacenza paper
⠙ | 2 | Complex test case from Schaefer et al. (2007) Piacenza paper
✔ | 2 | Complex test case from Schaefer et al. (2007) Piacenza paper [5.9 s]
⠏ | 0 | Results for synthetic data established in expertise for UBA (Ranke 2014)
⠋ | 1 | Results for synthetic data established in expertise for UBA (Ranke 2014)
⠙ | 2 | Results for synthetic data established in expertise for UBA (Ranke 2014)
⠹ | 3 | Results for synthetic data established in expertise for UBA (Ranke 2014)
⠸ | 4 | Results for synthetic data established in expertise for UBA (Ranke 2014)
✔ | 4 | Results for synthetic data established in expertise for UBA (Ranke 2014) [7.5 s]
══ Results ═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
Duration: 75.2 s
OK: 79
Failed: 1
Warnings: 0
Skipped: 3
|
