<feed xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom'>
<title>pfm/docs/reference/buffers.html, branch main</title>
<subtitle>Utilities for pesticide fate modelling (also on github)</subtitle>
<id>https://cgit.jrwb.de/pfm/atom?h=main</id>
<link rel='self' href='https://cgit.jrwb.de/pfm/atom?h=main'/>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://cgit.jrwb.de/pfm/'/>
<updated>2019-09-27T09:08:53Z</updated>
<entry>
<title>Fix for UK drainage, some EFSA interception and washoff</title>
<updated>2019-09-27T09:08:53Z</updated>
<author>
<name>Johannes Ranke</name>
<email>jranke@uni-bremen.de</email>
</author>
<published>2019-09-27T08:00:15Z</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://cgit.jrwb.de/pfm/commit/?id=435e07a6f7fd2599d783fd306ee6d9e08acc0c6b'/>
<id>urn:sha1:435e07a6f7fd2599d783fd306ee6d9e08acc0c6b</id>
<content type='text'>
- PEC_sw_drainage_UK() gave results that were a little bit too high
for the substances with the highest Koc (&gt;4000), as I used 0.01% instead
of 0.008% for them. This must have come from an old vesion of the UK
data requirements handbook, at least I do not have another explanation

- Add EFSA interception (from 2014 DegT50 guidance) and tier 1
crop wash-off factors (from 2017 PEC soil guidance) for some major
arable crops

- Update docs
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Exposit runoff calculations for surface water</title>
<updated>2017-10-27T16:15:29Z</updated>
<author>
<name>Johannes Ranke</name>
<email>jranke@uni-bremen.de</email>
</author>
<published>2017-10-27T16:15:29Z</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://cgit.jrwb.de/pfm/commit/?id=06b528f0c19ca9f7a311612c0e9ae80c0d0c1d3f'/>
<id>urn:sha1:06b528f0c19ca9f7a311612c0e9ae80c0d0c1d3f</id>
<content type='text'>
</content>
</entry>
</feed>
