aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/man
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'man')
-rw-r--r--man/EFSA_GW_interception_2014.Rd32
-rw-r--r--man/EFSA_washoff_2017.Rd32
-rw-r--r--man/PEC_sw_exposit_drainage.Rd2
-rw-r--r--man/PEC_sw_exposit_runoff.Rd2
-rw-r--r--man/PEC_sw_focus.Rd10
-rw-r--r--man/drift_data_JKI.Rd49
-rw-r--r--man/perc_runoff_exposit.Rd7
-rw-r--r--man/perc_runoff_reduction_exposit.Rd2
-rw-r--r--man/soil_scenario_data_EFSA_2015.Rd25
-rw-r--r--man/soil_scenario_data_EFSA_2017.Rd7
10 files changed, 33 insertions, 135 deletions
diff --git a/man/EFSA_GW_interception_2014.Rd b/man/EFSA_GW_interception_2014.Rd
index 2334d7f..ed29454 100644
--- a/man/EFSA_GW_interception_2014.Rd
+++ b/man/EFSA_GW_interception_2014.Rd
@@ -14,37 +14,13 @@ of active substances of plant protection products and transformation
products of these active substances in soil. \emph{EFSA Journal}
\bold{12}(5):3662, 37 pp., doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2014.3662
}
+\usage{
+EFSA_GW_interception_2014
+}
\description{
Subset of EFSA crop interception default values for groundwater modelling
}
\examples{
-\dontrun{
- # This is the code that was used to define the data
- bbch <- paste0(0:9, "x")
- crops <- c(
- "Beans (field + vegetable)",
- "Peas",
- "Summer oilseed rape", "Winter oilseed rape",
- "Tomatoes",
- "Spring cereals", "Winter cereals")
- EFSA_GW_interception_2014 <- matrix(NA, length(crops), length(bbch),
- dimnames = list(Crop = crops, BBCH = bbch))
- EFSA_GW_interception_2014["Beans (field + vegetable)", ] <-
- c(0, 0.25, rep(0.4, 2), rep(0.7, 5), 0.8)
- EFSA_GW_interception_2014["Peas", ] <-
- c(0, 0.35, rep(0.55, 2), rep(0.85, 5), 0.85)
- EFSA_GW_interception_2014["Summer oilseed rape", ] <-
- c(0, 0.4, rep(0.8, 2), rep(0.8, 5), 0.9)
- EFSA_GW_interception_2014["Winter oilseed rape", ] <-
- c(0, 0.4, rep(0.8, 2), rep(0.8, 5), 0.9)
- EFSA_GW_interception_2014["Tomatoes", ] <-
- c(0, 0.5, rep(0.7, 2), rep(0.8, 5), 0.5)
- EFSA_GW_interception_2014["Spring cereals", ] <-
- c(0, 0, 0.2, 0.8, rep(0.9, 3), rep(0.8, 2), 0.8)
- EFSA_GW_interception_2014["Winter cereals", ] <-
- c(0, 0, 0.2, 0.8, rep(0.9, 3), rep(0.8, 2), 0.8)
- save(EFSA_GW_interception_2014,
- file = "../data/EFSA_GW_interception_2014.RData")
-}
EFSA_GW_interception_2014
}
+\keyword{datasets}
diff --git a/man/EFSA_washoff_2017.Rd b/man/EFSA_washoff_2017.Rd
index 3ec7987..ba4d5c6 100644
--- a/man/EFSA_washoff_2017.Rd
+++ b/man/EFSA_washoff_2017.Rd
@@ -14,37 +14,13 @@ protection products and transformation products of these active substances
in soil. \emph{EFSA Journal} \bold{15}(10) 4982
doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4982
}
+\usage{
+EFSA_washoff_2017
+}
\description{
Subset of EFSA crop washoff default values
}
\examples{
-\dontrun{
- # This is the code that was used to define the data
- bbch <- paste0(0:9, "x")
- crops <- c(
- "Beans (field + vegetable)",
- "Peas",
- "Summer oilseed rape", "Winter oilseed rape",
- "Tomatoes",
- "Spring cereals", "Winter cereals")
- EFSA_washoff_2017 <- matrix(NA, length(crops), length(bbch),
- dimnames = list(Crop = crops, BBCH = bbch))
- EFSA_washoff_2017["Beans (field + vegetable)", ] <-
- c(NA, 0.6, rep(0.75, 2), rep(0.8, 5), 0.35)
- EFSA_washoff_2017["Peas", ] <-
- c(NA, 0.4, rep(0.6, 2), rep(0.65, 5), 0.35)
- EFSA_washoff_2017["Summer oilseed rape", ] <-
- c(NA, 0.4, rep(0.5, 2), rep(0.6, 5), 0.5)
- EFSA_washoff_2017["Winter oilseed rape", ] <-
- c(NA, 0.1, rep(0.4, 2), rep(0.55, 5), 0.3)
- EFSA_washoff_2017["Tomatoes", ] <-
- c(NA, 0.55, rep(0.75, 2), rep(0.7, 5), 0.35)
- EFSA_washoff_2017["Spring cereals", ] <-
- c(NA, 0.4, 0.5, 0.5, rep(0.65, 3), rep(0.65, 2), 0.55)
- EFSA_washoff_2017["Winter cereals", ] <-
- c(NA, 0.1, 0.4, 0.6, rep(0.55, 3), rep(0.6, 2), 0.4)
- save(EFSA_washoff_2017,
- file = "../data/EFSA_washoff_2017.RData")
-}
EFSA_washoff_2017
}
+\keyword{datasets}
diff --git a/man/PEC_sw_exposit_drainage.Rd b/man/PEC_sw_exposit_drainage.Rd
index e2294bf..c809e08 100644
--- a/man/PEC_sw_exposit_drainage.Rd
+++ b/man/PEC_sw_exposit_drainage.Rd
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
\title{Calculate PEC surface water due to drainage as in Exposit 3}
\source{
Excel 3.02 spreadsheet available from
-\url{https://www.bvl.bund.de/DE/04_Pflanzenschutzmittel/03_Antragsteller/04_Zulassungsverfahren/07_Naturhaushalt/psm_naturhaush_node.html#doc1400590bodyText3}
+\url{https://www.bvl.bund.de/SharedDocs/Downloads/04_Pflanzenschutzmittel/zul_umwelt_exposit.html}
}
\usage{
PEC_sw_exposit_drainage(
diff --git a/man/PEC_sw_exposit_runoff.Rd b/man/PEC_sw_exposit_runoff.Rd
index 03dbb4b..fca5553 100644
--- a/man/PEC_sw_exposit_runoff.Rd
+++ b/man/PEC_sw_exposit_runoff.Rd
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
\title{Calculate PEC surface water due to runoff and erosion as in Exposit 3}
\source{
Excel 3.02 spreadsheet available from
-\url{https://www.bvl.bund.de/DE/04_Pflanzenschutzmittel/03_Antragsteller/04_Zulassungsverfahren/07_Naturhaushalt/psm_naturhaush_node.html#doc1400590bodyText3}
+\url{https://www.bvl.bund.de/SharedDocs/Downloads/04_Pflanzenschutzmittel/zul_umwelt_exposit.html}
}
\usage{
PEC_sw_exposit_runoff(
diff --git a/man/PEC_sw_focus.Rd b/man/PEC_sw_focus.Rd
index 973b1fa..d79bbfd 100644
--- a/man/PEC_sw_focus.Rd
+++ b/man/PEC_sw_focus.Rd
@@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ PEC_sw_focus(
met_form_water = TRUE,
txt_file = "pesticide.txt",
overwrite = FALSE,
- append = TRUE
+ append = FALSE
)
}
\arguments{
@@ -73,7 +73,7 @@ should be written}
\item{overwrite}{Should an existing file a the location specified in
\code{txt_file} be overwritten? Only takes effect if append is FALSE.}
-\item{append}{Should the input text file be appended?}
+\item{append}{Should the input text file be appended, if it exists?}
}
\description{
This is a reimplementation of the FOCUS Step 1 and 2 calculator version 3.2,
@@ -81,8 +81,8 @@ authored by Michael Klein, in R. Note that results for multiple
applications should be compared to the corresponding results for a
single application. At current, this is not done automatically in
this implementation. Only Step 1 PECs are calculated. However,
-input files are generated that are suitable as input also for Step 2
-to be used with the FOCUS calculator.
+input files can be generated that are suitable as input for
+the FOCUS calculator.
}
\note{
The formulas for input to the waterbody via runoff/drainage of the
@@ -97,7 +97,7 @@ Step 2 is not implemented.
\examples{
# Parent only
dummy_1 <- chent_focus_sw("Dummy 1", cwsat = 6000, DT50_ws = 6, Koc = 344.8)
-PEC_sw_focus(dummy_1, 3000, f_drift = 0, overwrite = TRUE, append = FALSE)
+PEC_sw_focus(dummy_1, 3000, f_drift = 0)
# Metabolite
new_dummy <- chent_focus_sw("New Dummy", mw = 250, Koc = 100)
diff --git a/man/drift_data_JKI.Rd b/man/drift_data_JKI.Rd
index bde9aad..49b7552 100644
--- a/man/drift_data_JKI.Rd
+++ b/man/drift_data_JKI.Rd
@@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ data for field crops (Ackerbau), and Pome/stone fruit, early and late
JKI (2010) Spreadsheet 'Tabelle der Abdrifteckwerte.xls', retrieved
from
http://www.jki.bund.de/no_cache/de/startseite/institute/anwendungstechnik/abdrift-eckwerte.html
-on 2015-06-11
+on 2015-06-11, not present any more 2024-01-31
Rautmann, D., Streloke, M and Winkler, R (2001) New basic drift values in
the authorization procedure for plant protection products Mitt. Biol.
@@ -43,53 +43,6 @@ Values for non-professional use listed in the JKI spreadsheet were not
included.
}
\examples{
-
-\dontrun{
- # This is the code that was used to extract the data
- library(readxl)
- abdrift_path <- "inst/extdata/Tabelle der Abdrifteckwerte.xls"
- JKI_crops <- c("Ackerbau", "Obstbau frueh", "Obstbau spaet", "Weinbau frueh", "Weinbau spaet",
- "Hopfenbau", "Flaechenkulturen > 900 l/ha", "Gleisanlagen")
- names(JKI_crops) <- c("Field crops", "Pome/stone fruit, early", "Pome/stone fruit, late",
- "Vines early", "Vines late", "Hops", "Areic cultures > 900 L/ha", "Railroad tracks")
- drift_data_JKI <- list()
-
- for (n in 1:8) {
- drift_data_raw <- read_excel(abdrift_path, sheet = n + 1, skip = 2)
- drift_data <- matrix(NA, nrow = 9, ncol = length(JKI_crops))
- dimnames(drift_data) <- list(distance = drift_data_raw[[1]][1:9],
- crop = JKI_crops)
- if (n == 1) { # Values for railroad tracks only present for one application
- drift_data[, c(1:3, 5:8)] <- as.matrix(drift_data_raw[c(2:7, 11)][1:9, ])
- } else {
- drift_data[, c(1:3, 5:7)] <- as.matrix(drift_data_raw[c(2:7)][1:9, ])
- }
- drift_data_JKI[[n]] <- drift_data
- }
-
- # Manual data entry from the Rautmann paper
- drift_data_JKI[[1]]["3", "Ackerbau"] <- 0.95
- drift_data_JKI[[1]][, "Weinbau frueh"] <- c(NA, 2.7, 1.18, 0.39, 0.2, 0.13, 0.07, 0.04, 0.03)
- drift_data_JKI[[2]]["3", "Ackerbau"] <- 0.79
- drift_data_JKI[[2]][, "Weinbau frueh"] <- c(NA, 2.53, 1.09, 0.35, 0.18, 0.11, 0.06, 0.03, 0.02)
- drift_data_JKI[[3]]["3", "Ackerbau"] <- 0.68
- drift_data_JKI[[3]][, "Weinbau frueh"] <- c(NA, 2.49, 1.04, 0.32, 0.16, 0.10, 0.05, 0.03, 0.02)
- drift_data_JKI[[4]]["3", "Ackerbau"] <- 0.62
- drift_data_JKI[[4]][, "Weinbau frueh"] <- c(NA, 2.44, 1.02, 0.31, 0.16, 0.10, 0.05, 0.03, 0.02)
- drift_data_JKI[[5]]["3", "Ackerbau"] <- 0.59
- drift_data_JKI[[5]][, "Weinbau frueh"] <- c(NA, 2.37, 1.00, 0.31, 0.15, 0.09, 0.05, 0.03, 0.02)
- drift_data_JKI[[6]]["3", "Ackerbau"] <- 0.56
- drift_data_JKI[[6]][, "Weinbau frueh"] <- c(NA, 2.29, 0.97, 0.30, 0.15, 0.09, 0.05, 0.03, 0.02)
- drift_data_JKI[[7]]["3", "Ackerbau"] <- 0.55
- drift_data_JKI[[7]][, "Weinbau frueh"] <- c(NA, 2.24, 0.94, 0.29, 0.15, 0.09, 0.05, 0.03, 0.02)
- drift_data_JKI[[8]]["3", "Ackerbau"] <- 0.52
- drift_data_JKI[[8]][, "Weinbau frueh"] <- c(NA, 2.16, 0.91, 0.28, 0.14, 0.09, 0.04, 0.03, 0.02)
-
- # Save the data
- save(drift_data_JKI, file = "data/drift_data_JKI.RData")
-}
-
-# And these are the resulting data
drift_data_JKI
}
\keyword{datasets}
diff --git a/man/perc_runoff_exposit.Rd b/man/perc_runoff_exposit.Rd
index a3d19a6..47ea586 100644
--- a/man/perc_runoff_exposit.Rd
+++ b/man/perc_runoff_exposit.Rd
@@ -1,5 +1,6 @@
% Generated by roxygen2: do not edit by hand
% Please edit documentation in R/PEC_sw_exposit_runoff.R
+\docType{data}
\name{perc_runoff_exposit}
\alias{perc_runoff_exposit}
\title{Runoff loss percentages as used in Exposit 3}
@@ -16,7 +17,10 @@ adjacent water body bound to eroding particles}
}
\source{
Excel 3.02 spreadsheet available from
-\url{https://www.bvl.bund.de/EN/04_PlantProtectionProducts/03_Applicants/04_AuthorisationProcedure/08_Environment/ppp_environment_node.html}
+\url{https://www.bvl.bund.de/SharedDocs/Downloads/04_Pflanzenschutzmittel/zul_umwelt_exposit.html}
+}
+\usage{
+perc_runoff_exposit
}
\description{
A table of the loss percentages used in Exposit 3 for the twelve different Koc classes
@@ -24,3 +28,4 @@ A table of the loss percentages used in Exposit 3 for the twelve different Koc c
\examples{
print(perc_runoff_exposit)
}
+\keyword{datasets}
diff --git a/man/perc_runoff_reduction_exposit.Rd b/man/perc_runoff_reduction_exposit.Rd
index b9ea059..2fc32a6 100644
--- a/man/perc_runoff_reduction_exposit.Rd
+++ b/man/perc_runoff_reduction_exposit.Rd
@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ from which the values were taken.
}
\source{
Excel 3.02 spreadsheet available from
-\url{https://www.bvl.bund.de/EN/04_PlantProtectionProducts/03_Applicants/04_AuthorisationProcedure/08_Environment/ppp_environment_node.html}
+\url{https://www.bvl.bund.de/SharedDocs/Downloads/04_Pflanzenschutzmittel/zul_umwelt_exposit.html}
Agroscope version 3.01a with additional runoff factors for 3 m and 6 m buffer zones received from Muris Korkaric (not published).
The variant 3.01a2 was introduced for consistency with previous calculations performed by Agroscope for a 3 m buffer zone.
diff --git a/man/soil_scenario_data_EFSA_2015.Rd b/man/soil_scenario_data_EFSA_2015.Rd
index 0e7f374..8012a76 100644
--- a/man/soil_scenario_data_EFSA_2015.Rd
+++ b/man/soil_scenario_data_EFSA_2015.Rd
@@ -14,7 +14,10 @@ EFSA (European Food Safety Authority) (2015)
EFSA guidance document for predicting environmental concentrations
of active substances of plant protection products and transformation products of these
active substances in soil. \emph{EFSA Journal} \bold{13}(4) 4093
-doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2015.4093
+\doi{10.2903/j.efsa.2015.4093}
+}
+\usage{
+soil_scenario_data_EFSA_2015
}
\description{
Properties of the predefined scenarios used at Tier 1, Tier 2A and Tier 3A for the
@@ -22,26 +25,6 @@ concentration in soil as given in the EFSA guidance (2015, p. 13/14). Also, the
scenario and model adjustment factors from p. 15 and p. 17 are included.
}
\examples{
-\dontrun{
- # This is the code that was used to define the data
- soil_scenario_data_EFSA_2015 <- data.frame(
- Zone = rep(c("North", "Central", "South"), 2),
- Country = c("Estonia", "Germany", "France", "Denmark", "Czech Republik", "Spain"),
- T_arit = c(4.7, 8.0, 11.0, 8.2, 9.1, 12.8),
- T_arr = c(7.0, 10.1, 12.3, 9.8, 11.2, 14.7),
- Texture = c("Coarse", "Coarse", "Medium fine", "Medium", "Medium", "Medium"),
- f_om = c(0.118, 0.086, 0.048, 0.023, 0.018, 0.011),
- theta_fc = c(0.244, 0.244, 0.385, 0.347, 0.347, 0.347),
- rho = c(0.95, 1.05, 1.22, 1.39, 1.43, 1.51),
- f_sce = c(3, 2, 2, 2, 1.5, 1.5),
- f_mod = c(2, 2, 2, 4, 4, 4),
- stringsAsFactors = FALSE,
- row.names = c("CTN", "CTC", "CTS", "CLN", "CLC", "CLS")
- )
- save(soil_scenario_data_EFSA_2015, file = '../data/soil_scenario_data_EFSA_2015.RData')
-}
-
-# And this is the resulting dataframe
soil_scenario_data_EFSA_2015
}
\keyword{datasets}
diff --git a/man/soil_scenario_data_EFSA_2017.Rd b/man/soil_scenario_data_EFSA_2017.Rd
index 626ada3..f9e0729 100644
--- a/man/soil_scenario_data_EFSA_2017.Rd
+++ b/man/soil_scenario_data_EFSA_2017.Rd
@@ -14,7 +14,10 @@ EFSA (European Food Safety Authority) (2017)
EFSA guidance document for predicting environmental concentrations
of active substances of plant protection products and transformation products of these
active substances in soil. \emph{EFSA Journal} \bold{15}(10) 4982
-doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4982
+\doi{10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4982}
+}
+\usage{
+soil_scenario_data_EFSA_2017
}
\description{
Properties of the predefined scenarios used at Tier 1, Tier 2A and Tier 3A for the
@@ -23,5 +26,7 @@ scenario and model adjustment factors from p. 16 and p. 18 are included.
}
\examples{
soil_scenario_data_EFSA_2017
+
+waldo::compare(soil_scenario_data_EFSA_2017, soil_scenario_data_EFSA_2015)
}
\keyword{datasets}

Contact - Imprint