From d81550d0cccae824cc748de48e7fd50ea8d8033a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Johannes Ranke Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2020 18:02:18 +0200 Subject: Make na.rm = FALSE the default for geomean() This makes more sense and is in line with mean() from base R. Adapt tests and update docs. --- docs/reference/GUS.html | 32 +++++++++++++++++--------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-) (limited to 'docs/reference/GUS.html') diff --git a/docs/reference/GUS.html b/docs/reference/GUS.html index b44c120..e371c1a 100644 --- a/docs/reference/GUS.html +++ b/docs/reference/GUS.html @@ -8,11 +8,13 @@ Groundwater ubiquity score based on Gustafson (1989) — GUS • pfm + + @@ -32,8 +34,8 @@ - + @@ -41,6 +43,7 @@ $$GUS = \log_{10} DT50_{soil} (4 - \log_{10} K_{oc})$$" /> + @@ -84,7 +87,6 @@ $$GUS = \log_{10} DT50_{soil} (4 - \log_{10} K_{oc})$$" /> Reference - @@ -106,11 +108,9 @@ $$GUS = \log_{10} DT50_{soil} (4 - \log_{10} K_{oc})$$" />
-

The groundwater ubiquity score GUS is calculated according to the following equation $$GUS = \log_{10} DT50_{soil} (4 - \log_{10} K_{oc})$$

- 
GUS(...)
@@ -119,14 +119,20 @@ $$GUS = \log_{10} DT50_{soil} (4 - \log_{10} K_{oc})$$

 GUS(DT50, Koc, ...)
 
 # S3 method for chent
-GUS(chent, degradation_value = "DT50ref",
-  lab_field = "laboratory", redox = "aerobic",
-  sorption_value = "Kfoc", degradation_aggregator = geomean,
-  sorption_aggregator = geomean, ...)
+GUS(
+  chent,
+  degradation_value = "DT50ref",
+  lab_field = "laboratory",
+  redox = "aerobic",
+  sorption_value = "Kfoc",
+  degradation_aggregator = geomean,
+  sorption_aggregator = geomean,
+  ...
+)
 
 # S3 method for GUS_result
 print(x, ..., digits = 1)
- +

Arguments

@@ -198,29 +204,25 @@ be Koc values at a concentration of 1 mg/L in the water phase.

The number of digits used in the print method
- +

Value

A list with the DT50 and Koc used as well as the resulting score of class GUS_result

-

References

Gustafson, David I. (1989) Groundwater ubiquity score: a simple method for assessing pesticide leachability. Environmental toxicology and chemistry 8(4) 339–57.

-