From 4079a2c496aa4e8c6dc2a93afedcbedbf7a852b5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Johannes Ranke Date: Sun, 12 Nov 2023 21:59:34 +0100 Subject: Enable markdown and rebuild docs --- docs/reference/PEC_soil.html | 40 ++++++++++++++++++++-------------------- 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-) (limited to 'docs/reference/PEC_soil.html') diff --git a/docs/reference/PEC_soil.html b/docs/reference/PEC_soil.html index abe8e5a..98ac3ac 100644 --- a/docs/reference/PEC_soil.html +++ b/docs/reference/PEC_soil.html @@ -225,33 +225,33 @@ from the EFSA guidance from 2015 (p. 80) are be reproduced, this is not true for the TWA concentrations given for the same example in the EFSA guidance from 2017 (p. 92).

According to the EFSA guidance (EFSA, 2017, p. 43), leaching should be - taken into account for the EFSA 2017 scenarios, using the evaluation depth - (here mixing depth) as the depth of the layer from which leaching takes - place. However, as the amount leaching below the evaluation depth - (often 5 cm) will partly be mixed back during tillage, the default in this function - is to use the tillage depth for the calculation of the leaching rate.

+taken into account for the EFSA 2017 scenarios, using the evaluation depth +(here mixing depth) as the depth of the layer from which leaching takes +place. However, as the amount leaching below the evaluation depth +(often 5 cm) will partly be mixed back during tillage, the default in this function +is to use the tillage depth for the calculation of the leaching rate.

If temperature information is available in the selected scenarios, as - e.g. in the EFSA scenarios, the DT50 for groundwater modelling - (destination 'PECgw') is taken from the chent object, otherwise the DT50 - with destination 'PECsoil'.

+e.g. in the EFSA scenarios, the DT50 for groundwater modelling +(destination 'PECgw') is taken from the chent object, otherwise the DT50 +with destination 'PECsoil'.

References

EFSA Panel on Plant Protection Products and their Residues (2012) - Scientific Opinion on the science behind the guidance for scenario - selection and scenario parameterisation for predicting environmental - concentrations of plant protection products in soil. EFSA Journal - 10(2) 2562, doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2012.2562

+Scientific Opinion on the science behind the guidance for scenario +selection and scenario parameterisation for predicting environmental +concentrations of plant protection products in soil. EFSA Journal +10(2) 2562, doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2012.2562

EFSA (European Food Safety Authority) 2017) EFSA guidance document for - predicting environmental concentrations of active substances of plant - protection products and transformation products of these active substances - in soil. EFSA Journal 15(10) 4982 - doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4982

+predicting environmental concentrations of active substances of plant +protection products and transformation products of these active substances +in soil. EFSA Journal 15(10) 4982 +doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4982

EFSA (European Food Safety Authority) (2015) EFSA guidance document for - predicting environmental concentrations of active substances of plant - protection products and transformation products of these active substances - in soil. EFSA Journal 13(4) 4093 - doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2015.4093

+predicting environmental concentrations of active substances of plant +protection products and transformation products of these active substances +in soil. EFSA Journal 13(4) 4093 +doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2015.4093

Author

-- cgit v1.2.1