From 435e07a6f7fd2599d783fd306ee6d9e08acc0c6b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Johannes Ranke Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2019 10:00:15 +0200 Subject: Fix for UK drainage, some EFSA interception and washoff - PEC_sw_drainage_UK() gave results that were a little bit too high for the substances with the highest Koc (>4000), as I used 0.01% instead of 0.008% for them. This must have come from an old vesion of the UK data requirements handbook, at least I do not have another explanation - Add EFSA interception (from 2014 DegT50 guidance) and tier 1 crop wash-off factors (from 2017 PEC soil guidance) for some major arable crops - Update docs --- docs/reference/focus_80th.html | 159 ----------------------------------------- 1 file changed, 159 deletions(-) delete mode 100644 docs/reference/focus_80th.html (limited to 'docs/reference/focus_80th.html') diff --git a/docs/reference/focus_80th.html b/docs/reference/focus_80th.html deleted file mode 100644 index 60ecbdd..0000000 --- a/docs/reference/focus_80th.html +++ /dev/null @@ -1,159 +0,0 @@ - - - - - - - - -Calculate the 80th percentile according to FOCUS guidance — focus_80th • pfm - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
-
- - - -
- -
-
-
-

Calculate the 80th percentile according to FOCUS guidance

- Source: R/PELMO_runs.R - -
- -
- -

This is nowadays defined as the mean of the 16th and the 17th -highest value. Previously, the 17th highest values was used (FOCUS 2014, p. -18). NaN values need to be set to zero in order to reproduce the -values obtained by PELMO.

- -
- - 
focus_80th(c_period, old = FALSE)
- -

Arguments

- - - - - - - - - - -
c_period

A numeric vector of values to calculate the percentile from

old

Should the old calculation method be used (the 17th highest value)?

- - -
- -
- - -
- - - - - - -- cgit v1.2.1