From e3bc264df69f892e9ad990be22d3ec1b22041daa Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Johannes Ranke Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2020 13:37:59 +0200 Subject: TSCF estimation equations, update docs Briggs et al. (1982) and Dettenmaier et al. (2009) --- docs/reference/EFSA_GW_interception_2014.html | 53 +++---- docs/reference/EFSA_washoff_2017.html | 53 +++---- docs/reference/FOCUS_GW_scenarios_2012.html | 53 +++---- docs/reference/FOCUS_Step_12_scenarios.html | 36 ++--- docs/reference/TOXSWA_cwa.html | 67 ++++---- docs/reference/TSCF-1.png | Bin 0 -> 24506 bytes docs/reference/TSCF.html | 181 ++++++++++++++++++++++ docs/reference/drift_data_JKI.html | 56 +++---- docs/reference/index.html | 74 ++++++--- docs/reference/perc_runoff_exposit.html | 56 ++++--- docs/reference/perc_runoff_reduction_exposit.html | 56 ++++--- docs/reference/soil_scenario_data_EFSA_2015.html | 53 +++---- docs/reference/soil_scenario_data_EFSA_2017.html | 53 +++---- 13 files changed, 481 insertions(+), 310 deletions(-) create mode 100644 docs/reference/TSCF-1.png create mode 100644 docs/reference/TSCF.html (limited to 'docs/reference') diff --git a/docs/reference/EFSA_GW_interception_2014.html b/docs/reference/EFSA_GW_interception_2014.html index c8d08fd..d7ec108 100644 --- a/docs/reference/EFSA_GW_interception_2014.html +++ b/docs/reference/EFSA_GW_interception_2014.html @@ -8,23 +8,29 @@ Subset of EFSA crop interception default values for groundwater modelling — EFSA_GW_interception_2014 • pfm + - + - - + + + + + + + - - + + - + - - + + @@ -32,10 +38,10 @@ - + - + @@ -52,7 +58,7 @@ - +
-

Subset of EFSA crop interception default values for groundwater modelling

-
- + +

Format

A matrix containing interception values, currently only for some selected crops

-

Source

European Food Safety Authority (2014) EFSA Guidance Document for @@ -121,7 +124,6 @@ evaluating laboratory and field dissipation studies to obtain DegT50 values of active substances of plant protection products and transformation products of these active substances in soil. EFSA Journal 12(5):3662, 37 pp., doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2014.3662

-

Examples

if (FALSE) {
@@ -162,17 +164,10 @@ products of these active substances in soil. EFSA Journal
 #>   Spring cereals             0 0.00 0.20 0.80 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.80 0.80 0.80
 #>   Winter cereals             0 0.00 0.20 0.80 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.80 0.80 0.80
- @@ -183,7 +178,7 @@ products of these active substances in soil. EFSA Journal
-

Site built with pkgdown 1.4.1.

+

Site built with pkgdown 1.5.1.

diff --git a/docs/reference/EFSA_washoff_2017.html b/docs/reference/EFSA_washoff_2017.html index 1f7bce7..abe0b24 100644 --- a/docs/reference/EFSA_washoff_2017.html +++ b/docs/reference/EFSA_washoff_2017.html @@ -8,23 +8,29 @@ Subset of EFSA crop washoff default values — EFSA_washoff_2017 • pfm + - + - - + + + + + + + - - + + - + - - + + @@ -32,10 +38,10 @@ - + - + @@ -52,7 +58,7 @@ - +
-

Subset of EFSA crop washoff default values

-
- + +

Format

A matrix containing wash-off factors, currently only for some selected crops

-

Source

European Food Safety Authority (2017) EFSA guidance document for @@ -121,7 +124,6 @@ protection products and transformation products of these active substances in soil. EFSA Journal 15(10) 4982 doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4982

-

Examples

if (FALSE) {
@@ -162,17 +164,10 @@
 #>   Spring cereals            NA 0.40 0.50 0.50 0.65 0.65 0.65 0.65 0.65 0.55
 #>   Winter cereals            NA 0.10 0.40 0.60 0.55 0.55 0.55 0.60 0.60 0.40
- @@ -183,7 +178,7 @@
-

Site built with pkgdown 1.4.1.

+

Site built with pkgdown 1.5.1.

diff --git a/docs/reference/FOCUS_GW_scenarios_2012.html b/docs/reference/FOCUS_GW_scenarios_2012.html index 6b2cbe1..8b55d14 100644 --- a/docs/reference/FOCUS_GW_scenarios_2012.html +++ b/docs/reference/FOCUS_GW_scenarios_2012.html @@ -8,23 +8,29 @@ A very small subset of the FOCUS Groundwater scenario definitions — FOCUS_GW_scenarios_2012 • pfm + - + - - + + + + + + + - - + + - + - - + + @@ -32,11 +38,11 @@ - + - + @@ -53,7 +59,7 @@ soil definitions are from page 46ff. from FOCUS (2012)." /> - +
-

Currently, only scenario names with acronyms and a small subset of the soil definitions are provided. The soil definitions are from page 46ff. from FOCUS (2012).

- 
FOCUS_GW_scenarios_2012
- + +

Format

An object of class list of length 2.

-

References

FOCUS (2012) Generic guidance for Tier 1 FOCUS ground water assessments. Version 2.1. FOrum for the Co-ordination of pesticde fate models and their USe. http://focus.jrc.ec.europa.eu/gw/docs/Generic_guidance_FOCV2_1.pdf

-

Examples

FOCUS_GW_scenarios_2012
#> $names
@@ -186,17 +188,10 @@ soil definitions are from page 46ff. from FOCUS (2012).

 #> 51      Thi     Ck1      6    7.8      32.9    0.18     0.0
 #>
- @@ -207,7 +202,7 @@ soil definitions are from page 46ff. from FOCUS (2012).

-

Site built with pkgdown 1.4.1.

+

Site built with pkgdown 1.5.1.

diff --git a/docs/reference/FOCUS_Step_12_scenarios.html b/docs/reference/FOCUS_Step_12_scenarios.html index 77045f1..bbfb592 100644 --- a/docs/reference/FOCUS_Step_12_scenarios.html +++ b/docs/reference/FOCUS_Step_12_scenarios.html @@ -10,23 +10,27 @@ - + - + - + + + + + - - + + - + - - + + @@ -38,7 +42,6 @@ - @@ -56,7 +59,7 @@ The text file is not included in the package as its licence is not clear." /> - +
- @@ -309,7 +309,7 @@ The text file is not included in the package as its licence is not clear.

-

Site built with pkgdown 1.4.1.

+

Site built with pkgdown 1.5.1.

diff --git a/docs/reference/TOXSWA_cwa.html b/docs/reference/TOXSWA_cwa.html index cedb023..9f9e3c3 100644 --- a/docs/reference/TOXSWA_cwa.html +++ b/docs/reference/TOXSWA_cwa.html @@ -10,23 +10,27 @@ - + - + - + + + + + - - + + - + - - + + @@ -38,7 +42,6 @@ - @@ -56,7 +59,7 @@ Usually, an instance of this class will be generated by read.TOXSWA_cwa." /> - +
- @@ -259,7 +256,7 @@ for the requested moving window sizes in days.

-

Site built with pkgdown 1.4.1.

+

Site built with pkgdown 1.5.1.

diff --git a/docs/reference/TSCF-1.png b/docs/reference/TSCF-1.png new file mode 100644 index 0000000..efa9e0a Binary files /dev/null and b/docs/reference/TSCF-1.png differ diff --git a/docs/reference/TSCF.html b/docs/reference/TSCF.html new file mode 100644 index 0000000..b635ba2 --- /dev/null +++ b/docs/reference/TSCF.html @@ -0,0 +1,181 @@ + + + + + + + + +Estimation of the transpiration stream concentration factor — TSCF • pfm + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+
+ + + + +
+ +
+
+
+

Estimation of the transpiration stream concentration factor

+ + +
+ +
+

The FOCUS groundwater guidance (FOCUS 2014, p. 41) states that a reliable measured +log Kow for neutral pH must be available in order to apply the Briggs +equation. It is not clarified when it can be regarded reliable, but the +equation is stated to be produced for non-ionic compounds, suggesting that +the compound should not be ionogenic (weak acid/base) +or ionic.

+
+ + 
TSCF(log_Kow, method = c("briggs82", "dettenmaier09"))
+ +

Arguments

+ + + + + + + + + + +
log_Kow

The decadic logarithm of the octanol-water partition constant

method

Short name of the estimation method.

+ +

Details

+ +

The Dettenmaier equation is given to show that other views on the subject exist.

+

References

+ +

FOCUS (2014) Generic Guidance for Tier 1 FOCUS Ground Water Assessments. + Version 2.2, May 2014 +Dettenmaier EM, Doucette WJ and Bugbee B (2009) Chemical hydrophobicity and uptake +by plant roots. Environ. Sci. Technol 43, 324 - 329

+ +

Examples

+ 
plot(TSCF, -1, 5, xlab = "log Kow", ylab = "TSCF", ylim = c(0, 1.1))
TSCF_2 <- function(x) TSCF(x, method = "dettenmaier09")
+curve(TSCF_2, -1, 5, add = TRUE, lty = 2)
legend("topright", lty = 1:2, bty = "n",
+  legend = c("Briggs et al. (1982)", "Dettenmaier et al. (2009)"))
+
+ +
+ + +
+
+

Developed by Johannes Ranke.

+
+ +
+

Site built with pkgdown 1.5.1.

+
+ +
+
+ + + + + + + + diff --git a/docs/reference/drift_data_JKI.html b/docs/reference/drift_data_JKI.html index 08d8399..dd78451 100644 --- a/docs/reference/drift_data_JKI.html +++ b/docs/reference/drift_data_JKI.html @@ -9,23 +9,29 @@ Deposition from spray drift expressed as percent of the applied dose as published by the JKI — drift_data_JKI • pfm + - + - - + + + + + + + - - + + - + - - + + @@ -33,12 +39,12 @@ published by the JKI — drift_data_JKI • pfm + - - + @@ -55,7 +61,7 @@ published by the German Julius-Kühn Institute (JKI)." /> - +
-

Deposition from spray drift expressed as percent of the applied dose as published by the German Julius-Kühn Institute (JKI).

-
- + +

Format

A list currently containing matrices with spray drift percentage data for field crops (Ackerbau), and Pome/stone fruit, early and late (Obstbau frueh, spaet).

-

Source

JKI (2010) Spreadsheet 'Tabelle der Abdrifteckwerte.xls', retrieved @@ -130,7 +133,6 @@ on 2015-06-11

Rautmann, D., Streloke, M and Winkler, R (2001) New basic drift values in the authorization procedure for plant protection products Mitt. Biol. Bundesanst. Land- Forstwirtsch. 383, 133-141

-

Details

The data were extracted from the spreadsheet cited below using the R code @@ -146,7 +148,6 @@ these values are used for spray applications with handheld/knapsack equipment (tragbare Spritz- und Sprühgerate).

Values for non-professional use listed in the JKI spreadsheet were not included.

-

Examples


@@ -389,19 +390,10 @@ included.

 #>       50      0.06                       0.001           NA
 #>
- @@ -412,7 +404,7 @@ included.

-

Site built with pkgdown 1.4.1.

+

Site built with pkgdown 1.5.1.

diff --git a/docs/reference/index.html b/docs/reference/index.html index 0608dd9..944f1f2 100644 --- a/docs/reference/index.html +++ b/docs/reference/index.html @@ -10,23 +10,27 @@ - + - + - + + + + + - - + + - + - - + + @@ -53,7 +57,7 @@ - +
- @@ -393,7 +427,7 @@ water concentrations

-

Site built with pkgdown 1.4.1.

+

Site built with pkgdown 1.5.1.

diff --git a/docs/reference/perc_runoff_exposit.html b/docs/reference/perc_runoff_exposit.html index a0f723f..38c1f70 100644 --- a/docs/reference/perc_runoff_exposit.html +++ b/docs/reference/perc_runoff_exposit.html @@ -8,23 +8,29 @@ Runoff loss percentages as used in Exposit 3 — perc_runoff_exposit • pfm + - + - - + + + + + + + - - + + - + - - + + @@ -32,10 +38,10 @@ - + - + @@ -52,7 +58,7 @@ - +
-

A table of the loss percentages used in Exposit 3 for the twelve different Koc classes

-
- + +

Format

A data frame with percentage values for the dissolved fraction and the fraction - bound to eroding particles, with Koc classes used as row names

+ bound to eroding particles, with Koc classes used as row names

Koc_lower_bound

The lower bound of the Koc class

dissolved

The percentage of the applied substance transferred to an adjacent water body in the dissolved phase

@@ -121,12 +125,11 @@ adjacent water body bound to eroding particles

- +

Source

Excel 3.02 spreadsheet available from https://www.bvl.bund.de/EN/04_PlantProtectionProducts/03_Applicants/04_AuthorisationProcedure/08_Environment/ppp_environment_node.html

-

Examples

print(perc_runoff_exposit)
#>              Koc_lower_bound dissolved bound
@@ -143,17 +146,10 @@
 #> >20000-50000           20000     0.014 0.291
 #> >50000                 50000     0.001 0.451
- @@ -164,7 +160,7 @@
-

Site built with pkgdown 1.4.1.

+

Site built with pkgdown 1.5.1.

diff --git a/docs/reference/perc_runoff_reduction_exposit.html b/docs/reference/perc_runoff_reduction_exposit.html index baded1c..947d4c5 100644 --- a/docs/reference/perc_runoff_reduction_exposit.html +++ b/docs/reference/perc_runoff_reduction_exposit.html @@ -8,23 +8,29 @@ Runoff reduction percentages as used in Exposit — perc_runoff_reduction_exposit • pfm + - + - - + + + + + + + - - + + - + - - + + @@ -32,10 +38,10 @@ - + - + @@ -52,7 +58,7 @@ - +
-

A table of the runoff reduction percentages used in Exposit 3 for different vegetated buffer widths

- 
perc_runoff_reduction_exposit
- + +

Format

A named list of data frames with reduction percentage values for the dissolved fraction and the fraction bound to eroding particles, with vegetated buffer widths as row names. The names of the list items are the Exposit versions -from which the values were taken.

+from which the values were taken.

dissolved

The reduction percentage for the dissolved phase

bound

The reduction percentage for the particulate phase

- +

Source

Excel 3.02 spreadsheet available from https://www.bvl.bund.de/EN/04_PlantProtectionProducts/03_Applicants/04_AuthorisationProcedure/08_Environment/ppp_environment_node.html

Agroscope version 3.01a with additional runoff factors for 3 m and 6 m buffer zones received from Muris Korkaric (not published). The variant 3.01a2 was introduced for consistency with previous calculations performed by Agroscope for a 3 m buffer zone.

-

Examples

print(perc_runoff_reduction_exposit)
#> $`3.02`
@@ -158,17 +161,10 @@ from which the values were taken.

 #> 20 m           97.5  97.5
 #>
- @@ -179,7 +175,7 @@ from which the values were taken.

-

Site built with pkgdown 1.4.1.

+

Site built with pkgdown 1.5.1.

diff --git a/docs/reference/soil_scenario_data_EFSA_2015.html b/docs/reference/soil_scenario_data_EFSA_2015.html index d5ef9e7..cb3cf14 100644 --- a/docs/reference/soil_scenario_data_EFSA_2015.html +++ b/docs/reference/soil_scenario_data_EFSA_2015.html @@ -8,23 +8,29 @@ Properties of the predefined scenarios from the EFSA guidance from 2015 — soil_scenario_data_EFSA_2015 • pfm + - + - - + + + + + + + - - + + - + - - + + @@ -32,12 +38,12 @@ - + - + @@ -54,7 +60,7 @@ scenario and model adjustment factors from p. 15 and p. 17 are included." /> - +
-

Properties of the predefined scenarios used at Tier 1, Tier 2A and Tier 3A for the concentration in soil as given in the EFSA guidance (2015, p. 13/14). Also, the scenario and model adjustment factors from p. 15 and p. 17 are included.

-
- + +

Format

A data frame with one row for each scenario. Row names are the scenario codes, e.g. CTN for the Northern scenario for the total concentration in soil. Columns are mostly self-explanatory. rho is the dry bulk density of the top soil.

-

Source

EFSA (European Food Safety Authority) (2015) @@ -127,7 +130,6 @@ scenario and model adjustment factors from p. 15 and p. 17 are included.

of active substances of plant protection products and transformation products of these active substances in soil. EFSA Journal 13(4) 4093 doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2015.4093

-

Examples

if (FALSE) {
@@ -165,17 +167,10 @@ scenario and model adjustment factors from p. 15 and p. 17 are included.

 #> CLC     4
 #> CLS     4
- @@ -186,7 +181,7 @@ scenario and model adjustment factors from p. 15 and p. 17 are included.

-

Site built with pkgdown 1.4.1.

+

Site built with pkgdown 1.5.1.

diff --git a/docs/reference/soil_scenario_data_EFSA_2017.html b/docs/reference/soil_scenario_data_EFSA_2017.html index f5044e7..7e8044e 100644 --- a/docs/reference/soil_scenario_data_EFSA_2017.html +++ b/docs/reference/soil_scenario_data_EFSA_2017.html @@ -8,23 +8,29 @@ Properties of the predefined scenarios from the EFSA guidance from 2017 — soil_scenario_data_EFSA_2017 • pfm + - + - - + + + + + + + - - + + - + - - + + @@ -32,12 +38,12 @@ - + - + @@ -54,7 +60,7 @@ scenario and model adjustment factors from p. 16 and p. 18 are included." /> - +
-

Properties of the predefined scenarios used at Tier 1, Tier 2A and Tier 3A for the concentration in soil as given in the EFSA guidance (2017, p. 14/15). Also, the scenario and model adjustment factors from p. 16 and p. 18 are included.

-
- + +

Format

A data frame with one row for each scenario. Row names are the scenario codes, e.g. CTN for the Northern scenario for the total concentration in soil. Columns are mostly self-explanatory. rho is the dry bulk density of the top soil.

-

Source

EFSA (European Food Safety Authority) (2017) @@ -127,7 +130,6 @@ scenario and model adjustment factors from p. 16 and p. 18 are included.

of active substances of plant protection products and transformation products of these active substances in soil. EFSA Journal 15(10) 4982 doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4982

-

Examples

soil_scenario_data_EFSA_2017
#>        Zone Country T_arit T_arr Texture  f_om theta_fc   rho f_sce f_mod
@@ -145,17 +147,10 @@ scenario and model adjustment factors from p. 16 and p. 18 are included.

 #> CLC Châteaudun  589
 #> CLS    Sevilla  526
- @@ -166,7 +161,7 @@ scenario and model adjustment factors from p. 16 and p. 18 are included.

-

Site built with pkgdown 1.4.1.

+

Site built with pkgdown 1.5.1.

-- cgit v1.2.1