From 3e26a8ab76a434c3465ea1db1b4a2a2ff3ea8ec8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Johannes Ranke Date: Tue, 16 May 2017 18:40:25 +0200 Subject: Add TWA concentrations for days > 1, fix link Now we have seven test calculations for the Step 1 calculator, all perfectly passing. This provides confidence that this is a correct reimplementation of the Step 1 part of the Step 1/2 calculator. --- man/PEC_sw_focus.Rd | 15 ++++++++++----- 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) (limited to 'man/PEC_sw_focus.Rd') diff --git a/man/PEC_sw_focus.Rd b/man/PEC_sw_focus.Rd index 22c20c5..656bd6d 100644 --- a/man/PEC_sw_focus.Rd +++ b/man/PEC_sw_focus.Rd @@ -8,7 +8,8 @@ PEC_sw_focus(parent, rate, n = 1, i = NA, met = NULL, f_drift = NA, f_rd = 0.1, scenario = FOCUS_Step_12_scenarios$names) } \arguments{ -\item{parent}{A list containing substance specific parameters} +\item{parent}{A list containing substance specific parameters, e.g. +conveniently generated by \code{\link{chent_focus_sw}}.} \item{rate}{The application rate in g/ha. Overriden when applications are given explicitly} @@ -17,12 +18,13 @@ applications are given explicitly} \item{i}{The application interval} -\item{met}{A list containing metabolite specific parameters. If not NULL, +\item{met}{A list containing metabolite specific parameters. e.g. +conveniently generated by \code{\link{chent_focus_sw}}. If not NULL, the PEC is calculated for this compound, not the parent.} \item{f_drift}{The fraction of the application rate reaching the waterbody via drift. If NA, this is derived from the scenario name and the number -of applications via the drift data defined by the +of applications via the drift data defined by the \code{\link{FOCUS_Step_12_scenarios}}} \item{f_rd}{The fraction of the amount applied reaching the waterbody via @@ -42,9 +44,12 @@ this implementation. \note{ The formulas for input to the waterbody via runoff/drainage of the parent and subsequent formation of the metabolite in water is not - documented in the model description coming with the calculator + documented in the model description coming with the calculator. As one would + expecte, this additional input appears to be (as we get the same results) + calculated by multiplying the application rate with the molar weight + correction and the formation fraction in water/sediment systems. -Step 2 is not implemented +Step 2 is not implemented. } \examples{ # Parent only -- cgit v1.2.1