From e3bc264df69f892e9ad990be22d3ec1b22041daa Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Johannes Ranke Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2020 13:37:59 +0200 Subject: TSCF estimation equations, update docs Briggs et al. (1982) and Dettenmaier et al. (2009) --- man/soil_scenario_data_EFSA_2017.Rd | 6 ++++-- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) (limited to 'man/soil_scenario_data_EFSA_2017.Rd') diff --git a/man/soil_scenario_data_EFSA_2017.Rd b/man/soil_scenario_data_EFSA_2017.Rd index aeaacac..f6de290 100644 --- a/man/soil_scenario_data_EFSA_2017.Rd +++ b/man/soil_scenario_data_EFSA_2017.Rd @@ -4,9 +4,11 @@ \name{soil_scenario_data_EFSA_2017} \alias{soil_scenario_data_EFSA_2017} \title{Properties of the predefined scenarios from the EFSA guidance from 2017} -\format{A data frame with one row for each scenario. Row names are the scenario codes, +\format{ +A data frame with one row for each scenario. Row names are the scenario codes, e.g. CTN for the Northern scenario for the total concentration in soil. Columns are - mostly self-explanatory. \code{rho} is the dry bulk density of the top soil.} + mostly self-explanatory. \code{rho} is the dry bulk density of the top soil. +} \source{ EFSA (European Food Safety Authority) (2017) EFSA guidance document for predicting environmental concentrations -- cgit v1.2.1