From a5e458ecb33ae87e46b2237174a194f6252a97cf Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Johannes Ranke Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2019 08:53:30 +0200 Subject: Finish documentation of set_nd and test it --- man/set_nd.Rd | 8 ++++++-- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) (limited to 'man') diff --git a/man/set_nd.Rd b/man/set_nd.Rd index 8c766ac..8c6003c 100644 --- a/man/set_nd.Rd +++ b/man/set_nd.Rd @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ % Generated by roxygen2: do not edit by hand -% Please edit documentation in R/process_residues.R +% Please edit documentation in R/set_nd.R \name{set_nd} \alias{set_nd} \alias{set_nd_focus} @@ -17,7 +17,7 @@ if any later detections are above the loq.} set_nd(r, lod, loq = NA, time_zero = TRUE, time_zero_nd_value = NA, stop_after_first_nondetect = FALSE) -set_nd_focus(res, lod, loq = NA, time_zero = TRUE) +set_nd_focus(r, lod, loq = NA, time_zero = TRUE) } \arguments{ \item{r}{A character vector of sequential residues without replicates, with @@ -29,6 +29,10 @@ detection specified as 'nq', otherwise coercible to numeric} \item{loq}{Limit of quantification(numeric). Must be specified if the FOCUS rule to stop after the first non-detection is to be applied} +\item{time_zero}{Is the first value in the series a time zero value?} + +\item{time_zero_nd_value}{Which value should we use for non-detects at time zero?} + \item{stop_after_first_nondetect}{Should we really stop after the first non-detection?} } \description{ -- cgit v1.2.1